Inflation: Is This the Real Danger? 14 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
"Man’s got to know his limitations.” (Dirty Harry)
The massive bear market rally of the last two weeks has resurrected fears of inflation but I’m not sure inflation will be a problem—at least not in 2009. Nevertheless, a lot of people in the financial press and blogosphere are sounding the alarms prematurely and I’m not sure this is helpful to traders and investors. For me, the issue is about timing rather than strategy because both the inflationary and deflationary camps could be right.
There’s no question about it—when the Fed increases the monetary base a lot of money is ultimately going to flood the economy and the new money will compete for goods and services driving prices up. But this is also highly dependent on behavior patterns of the past. How certain are we that capital will flow into the same investments that thrived in inflationary periods of the past as we emerge from a very severe financial catastrophe? I think we’re going to see less spending for a while as we return back to health and the savings rate will increase. This is a generational shift, too, and the boomers who spent their money freely will be too busy licking their wounds and protecting what they have left. And 30:1 leverage is done, so let’s see how Wall Street generates the same profits of the past.
We also have to consider some of the deflationary elements that are causing so much distress in this current economic environment—mainly job losses, declining wages, and plunging home prices (the plunge continues). This are not purely monetary issues which is why the Fed is having such a hard time right now. I know that many inflation experts don’t consider falling home prices a deflationary phenomena because it’s not a monetary issue but a supply and demand problem—prices fall because demand declines. This is a limited view because it defines deflation solely on the contraction of the money supply and credit. That’s grossly oversimplifying a complex situation.
I think most economist will I agree that the very nature of a price drop is a deflationary event but it seems that people are also in the business of redefining economic terminology. In other words, if money didn’t drive the price down then it’s not deflation. Hmm. Tell that to the dude who lost all the equity in his home or saw his salary reduced by 10% this year. The terminology is very dangerous and almost Taliban-like in its fundamentalism. Some also think the CPI is a joke, but those people probably never shop for their own food or put gas in their car to notice the shifts in price. Trust me, the average homo sapien knows the cost of things. Right now we have fallen prices and fallen wages. I don’t see inflation yet.
During the last 12 months, we have also seen an unbelievable price reversal in energy prices. Just keep in mind that OPEC had to cut oil production to bring prices back up to the $50 range, putting in danger recovery efforts in many parts of the world. Oil, too, will take time to return to pre-crisis levels. Furthermore, Japan, which is the world’s second largest economic power is heading for deflation and the epicenter of that crisis is the retail sector. Many believe the U.S. is headed in the same direction and the latest data is not encouraging.
It’s amazing how some people keep ignoring the obvious. People just don’t respect the threat of deflation. We have record level unemployment claims, contracting GDP, and the housing sector is in the gutter. That’s not enough evidence? In an uncertain world we have to consider every threat—we have to hope for the best but be prepared for the worst. I just can’t overstate the importance of not going along with herd in times like this. Yes, eventually the new money will flow into cheap stocks and commodities and we’re going to have to deal with inflation but that time is not now.
Related Articles
|
























This article has 14 comments:
Perhaps I am missing something, so please support your deflation arguments by posting a table of products that consumers purchase that have declined in price. If you are talking about home prices, please post a twenty-year curve and tell us if they have "declined", except relative to an absurd and short-lived bubble.
Last week my electric utility sent out a notice of proposed rate increase. They are asking for a permanent 16% increase (and requesting an 8% temporary increase) (they have an energy cost pass-through in addition).
So lots of us are seeing inflationary price increases.
Everything is relative. Having a lot of money that grows more slowly is roughly equivalent to having a little money that grows more quickly. Anyone who has a lot of money knows this. Deflation will not magically make our quality of life better.
Frankly, I think an inflationary environment is better-suited to our nature then a deflationary one. At least so far as growth is concerned, capitalism seems to operate at its highest efficiency with a small amount of well managed inflation, and as long as our population continues to grow that is where we need to be on the curve.
-Matt
I disagree with your statement:
"inflation is only bad for debtors..."
In reality, deflation is bad for debtors... This is because what you already owe is difficult to come by when wages drop 10%. The wage drops are due to price drops, which is caused by weaker demand.
If you have accumulated savings, deflation is good.
On Mar 29 04:37 AM capitalisthero.com wrote:
> Will someone explain to me why deflation is bad? In deflation, the
> purchasing power of my wages is increased. The purchasing power
> of my nest egg is increased. Food, water, shelter, and medicine
> is cheaper because of deflation.
>
> As far as I can tell, inflation is only bad for debtors because their
> real interest rate is increased. I guess that sucks for the U.S.
> government since it's the biggest debtor the world has ever known.
>
>
> Deflation = good. Inflation = bad. Buy commodities as a hedge against
> inflation. Divest yourself of dollars; they will become very abundant
> very soon.
>
> Check out my original articles at captialisthero.com
On Mar 29 04:37 AM capitalisthero.com wrote:
> Will someone explain to me why deflation is bad? In deflation, the
> purchasing power of my wages is increased. The purchasing power
> of my nest egg is increased. Food, water, shelter, and medicine
> is cheaper because of deflation.
>
> As far as I can tell, inflation is only bad for debtors because their
> real interest rate is increased. I guess that sucks for the U.S.
> government since it's the biggest debtor the world has ever known.
>
>
> Deflation = good. Inflation = bad. Buy commodities as a hedge against
> inflation. Divest yourself of dollars; they will become very abundant
> very soon.
>
> Check out my original articles at captialisthero.com
On Mar 29 08:22 PM Mad Hedge Fund Trader wrote:
> The printing presses are already seeing it. All of the high grade
> paper used by the US Treasury to print money is bought by one firm,
> Crane & Co., which has been in the same family for seven generations.
> Last year the Feds printed 38 million banknotes worth $639 million.
> Although they have seen the recession cause the velocity of money
> to decline, recent reflationary efforts have spurred a big increase
> in demand for paper for $100 dollar bills. The US first issued paper
> money in 1861 to finance the Civil War, and Crane has been supplying
> them since 1879. The average life of a dollar bill is 21 months.
> Who said no one was doing well in this recession? M1, or notes and
> coins in circulation, is already exploding. Is this a warning of
> an imminent jump in inflation?
long term effects of money supply is neutral, but prices are sticky and market adjustments take time to reflect the difference in price level.
most economists and central agree that it is ideal to have a low level of inflation. the definition of "low" varies. this is usually 1 to 3% developed nations and higher in developing nations.