YTD Global Trend Status: Emerging Markets and Resource Exporters 3 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Emerging markets (EEM) are outperforming developed markets YTD — up 2.5% versus EFA, which is down 15%, and SPY, which is down 9%.
Resource export related markets Brazil, Russia, Australia, Canada and Chile, as a group, are doing better than the goods and services export related market group. Chile, a copper exporter, is up 19%. Russia, an oil exporter, is up 15%. Brazil, an agricultural and oil/ethanol exporter, is up 12%. Australia and Canada, as energy and materials exporters in more diversified economies, are down 3% and 2% respectively.
Crude oil is up 17% YTD, and copper is up 30%.
Goods and services exporters, Germany, Japan and India are down YTD (India is almost even). China and South Korea are positive YTD, roughly 2% and 6% respectively. Germany is down 20% and Japan in down 14%.
click images to enlarge
MSCI Emerging Markets: EEM
RESOURCE EXPORTERS
Brazil: EWZ
Russia: RSX
Australia: EWA
Canada: EWC
Chile: ECH
TWO KEY EXPORT RESOURCES
OIL
COPPER
GOODS/SERVICES EXPORTERS
Germany: EWG
Japan: EWJ
China: FXI
India: INP
South Korea: EWY
Related Articles
|


































Use Shanghai and Szensen indeces for China. HangSeng for Hongkong; Kospi for Korea; Nikkei225 for Japan; ASX200 for Australia; Sensex for India; DAX for Germany; etc.
The ETFs are still in disconnect to their underlying foreign indeces as most investors and traders are not aware or not following the market actions in those countries but rather are being emotionally affected by the relentless sell-off of the Dow Jones and SnP since Oct2008.
China, Hongkong, Taiwan, India, Korea, and Japan did not produce lower lows from Oct, 2008 to present.
China in particular is now in the process of finalizing an impulsive 1-2-3-4-5 rally on the weekly chart while FXI is still trying to form an A-B-C corrective process (in Elliott Waves parlance). A 1-2-3-4-5 is bullish while an ABC pattern is bearish. Big difference in performance and potential future price actions.
You have to use statistical data based on the actual indeces and not their ETFs that are presently dysfunctional to say the least. Once US traders and investors realize their mistakes, they should correct such mistakes accordingly if not the ETF managers.