China's First Step Towards Bilateral Currency Swaps 8 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Before the proposal of replacing USD with IMF's SDR as the world reserve currency, made by Zhou Xiaochuan, China's central banker, China had already made a series of bilateral currency swaps with some neighboring countries, with maturities of up to three years. Now they're extending the arrangement to Latin America.
Here's the list (in Billion Yuan, recent CNYUSD exchange rate 6.835):
- Hong Kong: 200
- South Korea: 180
- Indonesia: 100
- Malaysia: 80
- Argentina: 70
- Belarus: 20
According to a prominant economist in Beijing, these swaps serve dfferent purposes for each counterparty country: for Hong Kong, it's to prepare for the pending sale of Chinese T-bills there; for South Korea, it's for helping Korean companies raising capital in China; for Belarus, it's because Belarus wants to take CNY as their foreign reserve; for the rest, it's for settling bilateral trades (companies pay in the trading partner's local currency).
The implications are very intriguing:
- The official line on the rationale behind these swaps is to reduce forex risk and trading cost. This is a valid point.
- It offers support for currencies under downside risk. This applies to all except HKD.
- It serves to diversify China's foreign reserve, albeit only a small percentage (5%) so far, away from USD and to align the composition better with trading partners.
- Perhaps most importantly, the real meaning is that these are the first concrete step toward a post-USD world. The world trade cannot be based on bilateral currency swaps, to be sure. And CNY has a long way to go before it can become a world reserve currency. But as a transition, this certainly beats bartering, which has been remerging among countries and individuals.
Whether this will be brought up in the G20 summit remains an interesting question.
Stock position: None.
Related Articles
|
























This article has 8 comments:
On Apr 02 02:04 PM EUARTE wrote:
> The warning signs are quite clear. This is not good for America.
> However, Obama has by his silence shown that he has no real interest
> in saving the dollar. His legislation depends on a bad economy and
> some fear inside America. Outside of America he has no clear agenda.
> Lots of lip service and qute shows of leftist blah blag.
GOVERNMENTS CAN EASILY PRINT CURRENCY BILLS; NOT SO WITH GOLD BULLION. THE WORLD SHOULD GO BACK TO THE GOLD STANDARD.
On Apr 03 12:21 AM JULES wrote:
> PAPER CURRENCIES NOT BACKED BY SOLID GOLD BARS WILL ALWAYS BE EXPOSED
> TO DEVALUATION RISKS. THE USD, EURO, YUAN, YEN, GBP, - NON ARE BULLET
> PROOF AT THE END OF THE DAY.
> GOVERNMENTS CAN EASILY PRINT CURRENCY BILLS; NOT SO WITH GOLD BULLION.
> THE WORLD SHOULD GO BACK TO THE GOLD STANDARD.
In other news, Russia is considering a partial return to the gold standard! Whether people agree that the gold standard is a good thing or not, the message is clear. Russia, like China, is losing faith in the dollar. And if the dollar does fall, it will set off a chain reaction of competitive currency devaluation, just like it did in the 30's and in the 70's. I think all currencies are not safe in this environment, and hard assets are where opportunities are.
USD will remain strong for the duration of the depression, even though JPY collapsing is a distinct possibility. I don't know for how much longer Japan can bear the pain. Their decision yesterday to do practically nothing was very surprising to me.