Seeking Alpha
About this author:
Submit
an article to

Accurate, transparent, comparable and thorough financial statements are essential tools for performing mental calculations of value. Being able to assess and weigh the performance of a going concern is vital for a holder of capital considering allocation to more productive uses which benefit humanity. Trust in the accuracy, transparency, comparability and thoroughness of financial statements is indispensable. When that trust is lost then holders of capital rapidly retreat from risk and seek safer and less risky assets.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board asserts,

“The capital markets and government are comprised of many participants with competing demands, requirements, and proprietary interests. As independent entities without a political or commercial stake in a particular outcome, the FAF’s standard-setting Boards, the FASB and the GASB, provide objectivity and integrity to our country’s financial reporting system.”

THE SPINELESS GELATINOUS FASB

Financial companies have used their agents, U.S. lawmakers, to pressure the FASB to relax fair-value accounting rules. Yahoo! Finance reports,

“The changes will allow the assets to be valued at what they would go for in an “orderly” sale, as opposed to a forced or distressed sale. The new guidelines will apply to the second quarter that began this month.”

Bloomberg reports,

“Wells Fargo (WFC) and other banks argue the rule doesn’t make sense when trading has dried up because it forces companies to write down assets to fire-sale prices.”

WOULD BE A FUNNY STORY IF IT WERE NOT SO SAD

Months ago at a conference I was talking with a senior partner at DLA Piper. We discussed mark-to-market accounting and I made the assertion that if there is no bid then the asset may be worthless. He retorted with, ‘It is hard to say that a 60 story office building in New York is worthless.’ As the conversation progressed he told me a story.

One of his clients bought $1B of assets from Lehman Brothers which were to be sold back within a month. Two weeks after the sale Lehman Brothers evaporated and the client received a tough lesson regarding counter-party risk. His client left a quagmire of documents they assumed would never be read because of ‘orderly’ sales and instead asked what him what they owned.

After several weeks of reading and analyzing the documents while being paid hundreds of dollars per hour to do so he came back with some grim conclusions. They owned about 65 various real estate assets; including one large condominium complex in Texas. Many of the various assets had clauses which required further capital injections so the European bank has opened an office in New York and relocated employees to service the assets. But those assets all pale in comparison to this condominium complex.

Only about 15% of the units had been sold, it was built on shifting sand, the local government had condemned it and decreed it would have to be demolished. With a sly smirk I responded, “It seems the skyscraper with no bid is worth less than worthless.”

FAIR VALUE LYING

The recent FASB changes to relax fair-value accounting have a secondary purpose: To perpetuate fair value lying to protect the worthless, or in some cases worse than worthless, financial statements of zombie banks. The venerable banking behemoths, Bank of America (BAC) and Citigroup (C), have become Single Digit Midgets. What type of objectivity and integrity do these rules have?

How long will it take other banks like Wells Fargo, US Bancorp (USB) or Credit Suisse Group (CS) with their approximately $15.50, $15.50 and $34.50 share price respectively and below $65B, $27B and $40B market cap respectively to join the ranks of the single digit midgets?

Sure, they were profitable for a quarter but it was all an illusion based on bailout money funneled through the apparition AIG. These stolen funds also found their way, of course, to Goldman Sachs (GS), JP Morgan (JPM), and $35B ended up in European banks like Deutsche Bank (DB). Is it any surprise that there is a new dress code for bankers at parties like those outside the G-20?

CONCLUSION

But the primary purpose of these changes that have their catalyst in Washington and Wall Street appear to be to intentionally exacerbate the greater depression and postpone the credit contraction.

Perhaps the inmates infected with the financial insanity virus who are running the asylum have a King Canute complex where he decreed,

“And then he spoke to the rising sea saying “You are part of my dominion, and the ground that I am seated upon is mine, nor has anyone disobeyed my orders with impunity. Therefore, I order you not to rise onto my land, nor to wet the clothes or body of your Lord”.

The great credit contraction should not be feared but embraced. The result is that the malinvestment during the credit expansion, which has severely damaged the world economy, is liquidated and no additional malinvestment results. This is because capital seeks safer and more liquid assets as it moves down the liquidity pyramid. It is important to point out that the ETFs GLD and SLV have problems and do not have the same risk or liquidity profile as physical gold or silver.

The institution of fair-value lying and Geithner’s plan for toxic assets, which is how the banks will siphon more wealth out of the world economy to feed their parasitical vampiric appetite, are but vain attempts to entice capital to move up the liquidity pyramid. Gold loves truth and has no fear of accurate, transparent, comparable and thorough financial statements and those who trust in it build their financial castle on the immortal unchanging element. In contrast, fiat currency loves lies, cannot withstand the sun of scrutiny and those who trust in it are building their financial condominium on sand. The great credit contraction has arrived and only begun.

click to enlarge

Disclosure: Long physical gold and silver with no positions in GLD, SLV, BAC, C, WFC, USB, CS, GS, JPM.

Print this article
Comments
10
     
  • You know a little and think you know everything.

    FASB 157 did not exist prior to 2006 so there is nothing Historical to back your assertions. As a matter of Fact, the financial meltdown started Because of its implementation.

    The Financial instruments created prior to that time were not designed to be scrutinized Quarterly, once that piece of Financial Armageddon was forced onto the system, the financial system unravelled.

    The FASB knew Squat about the derivatives already in place. This change is a piddly bit of relief after the horse has already left the barn.

    But it may stem the future Commercial devaluations to come, here and abroad.(IMF will help there)

    The Great Credit Contraction has come and Gone.
    Too bad you missed it. IMHO
    2009 Apr 03 03:55 AM Reply
  •  
  • The "lying" was really in forcing banks to book paper losses before they occurred (and when they might never occur) on illiquid assets based on a temporary market crisis. This killed the banks and perpetuated the crisis. Lifting Mark to Market will be hailed as the turning point for the economy. Not all will be rosy from here, but this allows the markets and the marketplace to heal. Some banks will and should fail, but for the most part this was a fictional crisis crated by two stupid rules: mark to market as applied to the banks and the elimination of the uptick rule.
    2009 Apr 03 07:21 AM Reply
  •  
  • citez: Agreed, but let's carry it forward a tad.

    All of the World's Governments are now focused on "fixing" the problems and will do Whatever it takes to do so. If anyone actually believes that any kind of credit contraction will stand in the way of their concerted efforts, they have fully deluded themselves.

    The US no longer stands alone in this effort.
    2009 Apr 03 10:23 AM Reply
  •  
  • Your Deluded beliefs have been and will be highly profitable for me, but damaging to society. If you believe that Govts. are larger than the Market, you do not know History.


    On Apr 03 10:23 AM Conan the Barbarian wrote:

    > citez: Agreed, but let's carry it forward a tad.
    >
    > All of the World's Governments are now focused on "fixing" the problems
    > and will do Whatever it takes to do so. If anyone actually believes
    > that any kind of credit contraction will stand in the way of their
    > concerted efforts, they have fully deluded themselves.
    >
    > The US no longer stands alone in this effort.
    2009 Apr 03 10:44 AM Reply
  •  
  • Your generalization using the condo example is short sighted. The shifting sand issue should have been uncovered if proper due diligence was undertaken resulting in the deal never being done. This has nothing to do with mtm. Forcing companies with large, longterm hold portfolios to take paper losses due to mark to market accounting is dealing in the make believe. As an example if I make investments with a hold to maturity strategy and are forced to mtm quarterly the volitility reflected in my financial statements would have me go from red ink to black and back depending on general market conditions. Would I have earned or lost cash - absolutely not. Rather when I actually sell or redeem those investments then I would reflect a real gain or loss. Now tell me again why mtm is a good thing?
    2009 Apr 03 10:50 AM Reply
  •  
  • Another short with another whining article...
    2009 Apr 03 02:05 PM Reply
  •  
  • wakeup call and trendsrus: Thanks.

    The Transport sector has led economic recoveries before, but it has never been as ignored as the Current focus seems to be entirely on market manipulation of this or that.

    The DJTA had an intraday high today of 2976, that up from an annual low of 2121. 40% up.

    But hey, its just an unnoticed piece of market manipulation. If its not going to be noticed, why manipulate it?
    2009 Apr 03 04:45 PM Reply
  •  
  • Best message board I have ever red!!!
    2009 Apr 03 04:48 PM Reply
  •  
  • Monday1929: Governments Are The Market at this point.

    Or did you miss the Obama change from Bear to Bull in March. I know history quite well, especially Market History.

    So why don't you tell me how this particular Recession is the same as a previous one?

    Better yet, why don't you point out the Last time a concerted worldwide Governmental Intrusion into the Markets occurred?

    There is No History to use as a Guide.
    2009 Apr 03 05:00 PM Reply
  •  
  • Something tells me this guy has never even taken an accounting or economics class. Such cheerleaders appear in every bubble.

    Do you really think "runtogold.com" would become "runfromgold.com" if the price of gold became too high or inflation expectations subsided? Nope. This is pure ideology (see his inverted pyramid graphic, ha!). Just consider how ridiculous it would be if I started a website called "runtowheatfutures.com."

    How quickly people forget all the here-today, gone tomorrow sites that promoted real estate or tech stocks as the new can't-lose investment! Just do your kids a favor and keep their college funds in bank CD's.
    2009 Apr 07 05:39 PM Reply