S&P 500 Operating EPS Estimates Are Too Optimistic And The Market Is Expensive

Includes: SPY
by: Greenbackd

If your valuation models use forward estimates rather than trailing 12 months data, you're doing it wrong. Why? As we discussed in our book Quantitative Value, analysts are consistently too optimistic about the future, and so systematically overestimate forward earnings figures. They are consistently, systematically, predictably ignorant of mean-reverting base rates. As we wrote in the book:

Exceptions to the long pattern of excessively optimistic forecasts are rare. Only in 1995 and 2004 to 2006, when strong economic growth generated earnings that caught up with earlier predictions, do forecasts actually hit the mark. When economic growth accelerates, the size of the forecast error declines; when economic growth slows, it increases.

This chart from JPMorgan Asset Management as of a week ago shows the chronic overestimation of operating earnings:

The chart comes via Zero Hedge, where they ask, "Is the market cheap?" My answer is not on the basis of the Shiller P/E , which stands at 23.7 vs. the long-run arithmetic mean of 16.47, or around 40% overvalued. Neither is it cheap on the basis of Tobin's q. Smither's & Co. has it at 44% overvalued on the basis of q, and they note:

As [of] March 12, 2013, with the S&P 500 at 1552 the overvaluation by the relevant measures was 57% for non-financials and 65% for quoted shares.

Although the overvaluation of the stock market is well short of the extremes reached at the year-ends of 1929 and 1999, it has reached the other previous peaks of 1906, 1936, and 1968.

How about the single year P/E ratio as reported? The S&P 500 TTM P/E stands at 18 vs. the long-run mean of 15.49. But it's fine because the "E" is growing, right? No. The "E" peaked in February last year (see Standard & Poor's current S&P 500 Earnings -- go to "Download Index Data," and select "Index Earnings"). The multiple will now have to expand just to keep the market where it is. You have to do these sort of acrobatics to get it going up:

Margins are now going to bounce free of the wreckage like those few lucky souls who remember to assume the brace position before the plane hits the ground, even though the as-reported rolled over a year ago (I hope Denzel Washington is flying this plane).

So how is it cheap?

It's at 14.5 on the basis of 12-month forward operating earnings estimates vs. a long-run mean of 15.49. You gotta do what you gotta do to get the Muppets to buy. Good luck with that.