General Growth Properties: A Speculative Play with Favorable Risk / Reward 7 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
General Growth Properties (GGP) could not have worse news. GGP’s largest equity investor, hedgie Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square, is actually stumping for its bankruptcy (here). From Reuters:
"Bankruptcy is not just designed for companies that are insolvent," Ackman told a packed room of real estate investors, owners, analysts and bankers attending the New York University Schack Institute of Real Estate 14th Annual REIT Symposium. "Bankruptcy is also designed for companies that are solvent, but have liquidity problems that are due to events outside of their control."
All of this is setting up GGP as a high-risk, high-reward play.
From $41 one year ago, to its lowly 68 cents today, GGP knows downdraft. GGP’s quarterly net income and cash flows are dreadful, and news is only going to get worse. Bankruptcy is a likely option.
However, as a stock, there may be a path up. At 68 cents, GGP stock is worth $212 million. This $212 million manages an asset book value of $29.6 Billion–levered to the hilt, of course, with liabilities of $27.8 Billion.
But a Drexel Burnham truism, the old “F-U principle”, may figure in. It’s unlikely that GGP’s lenders want to run–or are in any state to take title to–GGP’s sprawling portfolio.
Ackman’s bucking for a bankruptcy works to GGP’s advantage… the knowledge and expertise (such as it is) of GGP’s staff and organization is worth a few bare percent of GGP’s assets managed (say 2% of $29.6 Billion being $592 million, or a 2.7x premium to GGP’s valuation today).
I’ve had a fair share of experience of real estate workouts, both on the debt side and the “equity” side. And the truth is: there is no “power” side. The lender doesn’t want to own or manage the asset. Ergo, the equity side is worth something, if only as an incentive for day-to-day management.
With Ackman’s bankruptcy play, the workout is the thing. At 68 cents per share, GGP is only for gamers who want speculation. If you buy here, you buy knowing your 68 can go to nil. But the quicker you get to bankruptcy, I think that Ackman’s idea goes, the quicker the courts award GGP equity some minimum value.
Above all, GGP at this level doesn’t favor shorts. Their day is past; there’s not enough “give” left for it to be attractive; you may even see a short squeeze. Further downs from ProShares Ultra Short Real Estate (SRS) are not likely–GGP is not big enough to weigh in size anymore.
With a totally speculative view, I accumulate a bit of GGP today, a bit more every 5 cents down. If I get 30% in a day or a week, I’m gone. If I lose 25%, I’m stopped out. This is not fundamentals talking, or capitalist principles. It’s just an assessment of what Ackman is promoting, and how real estate endgames often end.
As ever, I wish you good luck, and good fortune. Thank you for your participation.
Disclosure: No position in GGP. Will accumulate and sell as discussed above.
Related Articles
|























REIT leverage implies that an increase above 3% in defaults basically trigger insolvency, We are getting there shortly.
On Apr 03 11:06 AM User 388225 wrote:
> This strikes me as a more responsible bull argument on GGP common
> stock than most I've seen lately. I agree wholeheartedly with the
> assertion that the banks don't want to own the assets. But I'm sure
> you realize, it's not as black and white as either the lenders get
> the assets or the equity gets a recovery. The middle ground, and
> the most likely outcome, in my view, is that the bonds get the equity
> and the existing stock is canceled. What is missing from most analysis
> of this name is that everyone focuses on abstract valuation analysis,
> forgetting that sources and uses of cash are important too. GGP can't
> get out of bankruptcy until it cures defaults on a $2.6 billion unsecured
> term loan, $2.3 billion of Rouse bonds, and a $1.55 billion convertible
> bond. It has no means of doing so. Holders of these instruments aren't
> likely to take new notes up to the full amount they are owed. They
> are likely, therefore, to get all the new equity when GGP comes out
> of Ch 11. REITs have never really been bankrupt before, so all the
> REIT bulls out there can be excused for lacking understanding about
> Chapter 11, but it might be time for you all to brush up.
Ackman’s bucking for a bankruptcy works to GGP’s advantage… the knowledge and expertise (such as it is) of GGP’s staff and organization is worth a few bare percent of GGP’s assets managed (say 2% of $29.6 Billion being $592 million, or a 2.7x premium to GGP’s valuation today).
I’ve had a fair share of experience of real estate workouts, both on the debt side and the “equity” side. And the truth is: there is no “power” side. The lender doesn’t want to own or manage the asset. Ergo, the equity side is worth something, if only as an incentive for day-to-day management."
The flaw in this argument is that the "FU" principal will benefit you, a non-management common shareholder. When (not if) GGP goes into bankruptcy, the existing common shareholders will get wiped out. The existing debtholders will become holders of newly issued common shares, and whatever tip they need to keep management from "F'ing Them", will be allocated out of that pool of newly issued common shares. You will get doodly-squat.
It closed today (April 7, 2009) at $1.05.
I suggest that whoever might have followed this advice sell most of their GGP and book their 69% gains right now.
I will keep all my shares.
Won't sell a single share.