No Reason to Fear the IMF Gold Sales 21 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Well, it looks like the IMF may finally unload that 403 tonnes of gold they've been talking about selling for the last couple years. It should raise a whopping $12 billion which, honestly, sounds like a drop in the bucket compared to the trillions that have been spent trying to fix the financial mess we are all in.
China may end up buying the whole thing. If I were them, I certainly would.
They've got about $2 trillion in U.S. dollar denominated assets about which they have become increasingly skeptical regarding its long-term value. Why not spend about half of one percent of their reserves on something that has intrinsic value?
It would be like having $1,000 and trying to decide if you should spend six dollars. That's about as close as you can get to a "no-brainer" in the world of central banking.
Related Articles
|























Anyway, I wouldn't worry about it, Obama will have to sell off most of the US Gold just to pay the bills. That's if there really is anything left in Fort Knox?
At today's prices the IMF stack is only worth around $11.5 billion+
www.imf.org/external/p...
www.lbma.org.uk/statis...
And as of the Ft. Knox reserve, chances are - there is nothing left to pay off the bills. Bad for them.
On Apr 03 05:58 PM Dave Wrixon wrote:
> It would make sense for them to cash dollars in for Gold, but are
> you sure their gold reserves are that small?
>
> Anyway, I wouldn't worry about it, Obama will have to sell off most
> of the US Gold just to pay the bills. That's if there really is anything
> left in Fort Knox?
The worse it gets, and currencies are printed like there's no tommorow, the more Gold floods the markets, the Lower the perception of Inflation.
Just an opinion on how I would go about squelching future inflationary fears.
I am not sure if I am becoming a synic... but I find the price of gold is not behaving as one would expect in these economic times. Any thoughts?
Or are you referring to paper gold?
On Apr 04 09:57 AM Vox Rationalis (aka BS Detector) wrote:
>>> China could buy virtually
> any amount of gold it likes at any time - the market is quite liquid.<<<
In any case, the moot point is that Gold has not appreciated as much as one would expect in these times. I feel that the reason for this puzzling phenomenon lies in the amount of panic. Investors and savers would sleep with cash below thier mattresses if the panic is extreme in stead of buying any asset class. Additionally, process of develeraging required increased availability of cash or fiat currency; gold may not have helped in the process - so why buy it.
I follow a thumb rule for gold - buy in September, sell in March. Examine historical charts and you will find for yourself.
> Any amount? Really? And get it delivered? Or are you referring to paper gold?
Can you cite any instances where certificate holders were unable to take physical delivery?
The IMF's 403 tonnes is just a blip when compared to annual production and, currently high, scrap sales. The communique also speaks of "over 2 to 3 years" - that's if even one ounce of it ever reaches the open market. [Japan has just lent the IMF $100 billion - I wonder what the collateral was...?]
Still; it gives the shorts a nice hoax to peddle in their daily quest to shake a few more stop-loss triggers out of the futures market.
On Apr 04 11:54 AM Vox Rationalis wrote:
> Can you cite any instances where certificate holders were unable to take physical delivery?<
Vox, let me refer you to another SA article. "NYSE Runs Out Of Gold Bars........"
seekingalpha.com/artic...
If every US citizen bought 1 oz. of gold the 8,000 T. US stockpile would be gone and more. There sure isn't much around.
Eric A Ryan busted up that piece of fiction in the middle of the comment stream.
But since it was an unverified opinion instead of factual, its still there, snaring the unwary.
You do Due Diligence on investments, you should do DD on the Articles which guide you as well. imo
For a quarter of a century the metal prices languished, but suddenly
gold is touted as a 'must have' asset. From what I see, world use of gold for jewellery and decorative purposes is diminishing rapidly. leaving the speculators to pick up the baton.
The purchase of gold is driven by greed and speculative forces, the same forces which caused the housing bubble. Can people not see this?
Peter Jackson.
On Apr 05 05:44 PM Peter Jackson wrote:
> Why the recent obsession with gold? Gold creates no jobs, pays no
> dividends and stimulates no economic activity. After the days (in
> early 1980) when Bunker Hunt pushed the silver price to $50 per oonce
> and gold rocketed to nearly $900 per ounce, both metals fell to a
> small fraction of those prices.
> For a quarter of a century the metal prices languished, but suddenly
>
> gold is touted as a 'must have' asset. From what I see, world use
> of gold for jewellery and decorative purposes is diminishing rapidly.
> leaving the speculators to pick up the baton.
> The purchase of gold is driven by greed and speculative forces, the
> same forces which caused the housing bubble. Can people not see this?
>
>
> Peter Jackson.
"If every US citizen bought 1 oz. of gold the 8,000 T. US stockpile would be gone and more. There sure isn't much around."
Not quite, but it's meaningless anyway. If every US citizen wanted to buy 1 share of Citigroup, the shortage would drive shares into the clouds. If every American decided that that he or she MUST eat a Big Mac today, every McDonald's would have lines out the door and would run out of pre-formed 1/10 lb. patties before the end of the lunch hour. So what?