Segway's Personal Electronic Vehicle: Nothing Says Success Like Teaming Up with GM 8 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Hey, so Segway and GM are going to work to produce a new two-person Segway-ish quasi-car. For what, you might ask? It doesn’t look like a particularly comfortable way to commute, and neither does it seem likely to work well in urban settings, where pedestrians and cyclists get along just fine under their own power, thank you. As Atrios says:
I think a big problem for vehicles like this is that they aren’t all that compatible with the existing universe of roads and cars.
I can think of one setting (other than beach communities and golf courses, maybe) where vehicles like this might work on a mass scale — densifying suburbs. It’s fine to run transit lines through suburbs, and build dense TOD around stations, and replace strip malls with mixed-use, walkable mini-neighborhoods, but the question remains — how do you get all the thousands of people in homes that aren’t a comfortable walk from retail and transit centers to those places? Cars are an option, but cars are extremely bulky. That bulk means more traffic and more parking, and also does very little to address all the emissions and gas-cost problems we face.
But small personal electric vehicles could fill that niche. They could also facilitate car-sharing in the suburbs, which might be logistically impossible otherwise. There’s still the question of where the things travel, but that’s probably more manageable in driveable suburbs. They a) tend to have perpetually empty sidewalks which could suffice as PEV paths, and b) have wide roads that could easily accommodate PEV lanes.
I last wrote about smaller stocks making more sense than larger ones just a bit early in late January. The call ended up being right, but for the wrong reason I suppose. In any event, the relationship is back to where it was then, and I believe that this could be an opportunity. Specifically, in a market that is relatively overbought, there are many smaller companies that are quite oversold due to tax-loss selling and perhaps window-dressing. The portfolio I manage has a few of these! I have been adding to some of these names in my model portfolios as well. Additionally, there are many stocks that are in a corrective phase but that look attractive.
I believe that as the calendar turns, investors will be taking a closer look at laggards as well as increasing their tolerance for illiquidity that is typically associated with smaller stocks. Smaller stocks typically have slightly higher PE ratios but are valued similarly to larger ones on a debt-adjusted basis. I guess I am looking for the January effect to work, but noting that sometimes it comes early.
I last wrote about smaller stocks making more sense than larger ones just a bit early in late January. The call ended up being right, but for the wrong reason I suppose. In any event, the relationship is back to where it was then, and I believe that this could be an opportunity. Specifically, in a market that is relatively overbought, there are many smaller companies that are quite oversold due to tax-loss selling and perhaps window-dressing. The portfolio I manage has a few of these! I have been adding to some of these names in my model portfolios as well. Additionally, there are many stocks that are in a corrective phase but that look attractive.
I believe that as the calendar turns, investors will be taking a closer look at laggards as well as increasing their tolerance for illiquidity that is typically associated with smaller stocks. Smaller stocks typically have slightly higher PE ratios but are valued similarly to larger ones on a debt-adjusted basis. I guess I am looking for the January effect to work, but noting that sometimes it comes early.
Is this a good idea, on net? I don’t know. But as a potential market, I think it might work.
Related Articles
|
























it's 2 seated, 2 wheeled, and too ambitious
General Motors fearing their time is over
is desperate to meet their innovation quota
partnered with Segway trying to make headway
came up with something just a little more deadly
works like the other one except that you sit
and ride around praying that you don't get hit
To listen to me rap my opinion, visit:
www.youtube.com/watch?...
seekingalpha.com/autho...
It's hard to predict what transportation would look like if oil prices hovered up around $100 for a year or more. Perhaps this is it. But there is no money in solving tomorrow's problems today. GM should be partnering with any of the small plug-in hybrid firms to green-up their line of SUVs. That's where the market is now.
On Apr 08 10:53 AM MikeCooper wrote:
> As much as I love to see GM finally trying to think out of the box,
> I just don't see the market for this at all. PUMAs will not be allowed
> on sidewalks for many good reasons. That means it will share the
> road with the big vehicles Americans still love to buy.
>
> It's hard to predict what transportation would look like if oil prices
> hovered up around $100 for a year or more. Perhaps this is it. But
> there is no money in solving tomorrow's problems today. GM should
> be partnering with any of the small plug-in hybrid firms to green-up
> their line of SUVs. That's where the market is now.