Online Music Will Not Replace Satellite Radio 19 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Recently, I have seen many claims that devices such as the iPhone which possess the ability to stream free online music, will somehow “kill” satellite radio. Claims such as these sound reasonable to many, yet none truly stand up to a reasonable analysis.
It is my belief that mobile devices will only supplement Satellite Radio by providing more listening options for Sirius XM subscribers. I have already argued that the content available on Satellite Radio which includes much more than just commercial free music, as opposed to ad-supported Internet music makes the case in and of itself for Satellite Radio’s dominance and longevity. Just look at terrestrial radio’s ad-supported model and it becomes clear that it just doesn’t work.
As for the delivery option of an iPhone or similar devices, one important factor seems to be overlooked… the battery itself. Cell phone users know all to well that with each charge, the battery’s capacity is lessened each time. Cell phones and other mobile devices have a hard enough time getting through a single day as a cell phone, much less a 24 hour-a-day jukebox. Until a nuclear version of a cell phone battery is introduced, mobile devices will never be able to truly replace Satellite Radio, even if they were to provide an equivalent amount and diversity of content.
There is yet another fact that makes any argument for the demise of Satellite Radio at the hands of the Internet moot. It lies in the generational gap that exists. The largest proportion of wealth and thus disposable income lies not in the twenty-something crowd which new technologies appeal to most, but in the now retiring baby boom generation, a generation that grew up with radio as its source for music, news and general entertainment. Habits are difficult to change.
To believe that this group of people will run out and buy high priced iPhones and BlackBerry’s to replace their in-dash car radios is just insane.
Position: Long SIRI.
Related Articles
|





















My experience on the iPhone is Pandora is just OK. I listen to it once and a while at the gym and frankly its typicall AT&T dropped service stuff. So, I take a break and pull out the phone and "cue" it back up again. Thats not to mention the programming is limited, right? Hey, SXM has so much content, I have yet to hear most of it. When I am in my car off on a long drive, I sometimes get tired of Watercolors so I switch over to Blue Neck comedy, or over to Howard, or to CNN or Sports.
Finally, and worth noting, I have a older Starmate that works just fine. I have a computer "Altec Lansing" sound system, a Radio Shack transformer, and a outdoor antenna. I take this stuff in a cardboard box when I am on the road and presto, SXM right there entertaining me. Try to go up in the mountains at 7000 ft. and get cell service, really, good luck!
Brandon, thanks for the positive views on SXM, you know like us, we have a winner here and the real big stuff, not just what SXM comes up with but Liberty too promises to be exciting goodies!
Internet wont replace sat radio. Pandora wont be in business much longer. Iphone is not a radio, but a compliment to a radio.
Good article Brandon.
This stock is still so undervalued, its not even funny. The bottom line will be seen soon enough. Positive EBITA will be reported this quarter in my opinion. They might even beat estimates. Look for this puppy to break out of its .42-.32 cent range very soon. Should be over .50 cents by the CC. DYODD. IMVHO.
There are a lot of areas, most of the geographic U.S. in fact, that have spotty coverage from any transport medium other that satellite. Yes, I may be able to get wonderful content via my iPhone or BlackBerry, but only if I am within range of decent cell coverage. Most of the geographic U.S. does not fall under such a continuous blanket of coverage. Point taken. And the content does not match what SiriusXM has available. Another point taken.
Nevertheless, it is going to take a few items to make this stock worth anything:
1. Less debt.
2. Lesser costs for the quality content the company provides, as well as adding new content.
3. An overall market rebound.
4. The product being available everywhere, i.e. autos (covered), internet (covered), cell phones (emerging), homes (needs more work and to be cheapened), portables (needs to be cheapened), and others (muzak style, on-hold-music, cant answer to this one).
5. More advertising to bring in more subscribers.
Make this product ubiquitous and irresistible and you will have a winner. But most of all, work on the debt. Oh, and stop porking the shareholders with dilution.
itunes.apple.com/WebOb...
itunes.apple.com/WebOb...
itunes.apple.com/WebOb...
itunes.apple.com/WebOb...
qhttp://itunes.apple.c...
Battery life is not an issue. I have a Griffith adaptor that charges the battery and plays audio thru my car radio ( www.griffintechnology.... ).
Coverage with ATT has been fine for me, even driving from Washington DC area through rural areas to the shore. WiFi is also available in many places.
I am too cheap to pay up to $17 a month when I have better choices for free.
On Apr 10 10:22 AM vassar wrote:
> I dumped XM-Sirius for the iPhone Apps Pandora, Public Radio, Stitcher,
> Ustream and RSS Player. Pandora plays the music I like, Public Radio
> is great for NPR talk radio and Stitcher has a little bit of everything.
>
>
> itunes.apple.com/WebOb...;mt=8
>
>
> itunes.apple.com/WebOb...;mt=8
>
>
> itunes.apple.com/WebOb...;mt=8
>
>
> itunes.apple.com/WebOb...;mt=8
>
>
> qhttp://itunes.apple.c...
>
> Battery life is not an issue. I have a Griffith adaptor that charges
> the battery and plays audio thru my car radio ( www.griffintechnology....
> ).
>
> Coverage with ATT has been fine for me, even driving from Washington
> DC area through rural areas to the shore. WiFi is also available
> in many places.
>
> I am too cheap to pay up to $17 a month when I have better choices
> for free.
Lets assume Pandora and Slacker and every other internet radio station has to pay royalties, and this enables them to no longer be a viable free service. You now have 3 choices if you are in this industry.
1. Go out of business.
2. Increase advertising on the site to compensate(never happen).
3. Charge for the service.
So if they are charging for the service, it wont be much, or why would you do it? Slacker isnt better than Sirius. Content, or anything else. The only thing it had on it it was either cheap or free. If its not free, you might as well get sat radio.
Then theres HD radio. If it takes sat radio as long to get going as this, it wont be a factor. As of right now, its going nowhere. Sirius will not be mandated to put HD radio in their radios. The FCC wording used is a clue here. They admitted that they were allowed to merge because they DID have competition, HD radio mentioned. Now.... If your the government, are you going to require Microsoft to make windows ask you if your sure you want this operating system, and wouldnt you like Mac instead? You dont ask your competitor to allow you to compete on their dime to boot. Crazy. Then theirs Iphone/Ipod music solution. Blackberry. Internet streaming. ONce again, coverage, content, and interruptions. Sorry, but a phone is still a phone, You have to use it. You cant listen to music and talk on the phone at the same time. Plus its so small, hard to use in a car. Who wants to risk their 300 dollar phone constantly with the challenge of providing music constantly, to systems that might need more juice. You going to being your Iphone into your living room and stream pandora through it, into your 100 watt speakers? Really? Whos doing that? No, Iphone is however an excellent music alternative generator, of which now SiriusXM is available.
Internet in cars? Naa, more of a visual medium. You need to see to change stations, etc... Hard to hold your laptop with a full car too. Not buying it. Sorry Im not too up too date on what the NEWEST cars support, but this is soooo untouched still, its immediate threat is not a worry. Medium term, no worries. Long term... Geez who knows, even IBM could be out of business in 5 years. How does any one know so sure whats going to happen in 5 years? But we can see 1 or 2 years away. And Homer seems to think their balance sheet is ready to shine. Dont need to add more subs, its all gravey.
Then you add deeper and deeper penetration rates, lower costs to add subs, never having to pay more for talent(old contracts will be much higher than the new ones for all their content, including Howard).
Requesting more info and your take on the issue below: Felix Salmon at Rueters reported on Short intrest yesterday (4/9). SIRI was included in two list. Most Short intrest in the Market and Largest DECREASE in short intrest in the month of March. His numbers:
March 1st = 181,243,884
March 31st = 161,851,340
That's a Decrease of 11.98% or 19,392,544 shares.
This seems like the MOST SIGNIFICANT and POSITIVE news I've heard in a long time. 20 mil short shares have fled! Would seem a few folks think SIRI will move positive now and through the next QTR report. Wouldn't you think? Would sure like a seperate story with a few more details from you.
Thanks...LONG 100K shs @ .13 !!!
MIT developed a new "system" , recharging a battery of a cellphone or a Laptop in 5 seconds, even a electric car will be recharged in about 5 minutes instead of 7 to 8 hours. It will be available in 2011 and revolutionary. Will it be the end for Satrad ? No of course not, but probably the end of oil and gasoline.
That is all I know, but good enough for me to postpone the purchase of a new car and buy some SI and GE.
On Apr 10 01:36 PM Neal Barkett wrote:
> User 261133, I've seen articles on this new MIT nano battery tech,
> but where are you getting the info that it will be ready by 2011
> and if so in what form (small electronic devices/Cars)? This would
> change the world. Do you have any further info you could share?
On Apr 10 12:37 PM User 261133 wrote:
> I love Sirius and I am long Sirius and I believe it will be successful
> if well managed in the future, but as for the battery you are dead
> wrong.
> MIT developed a new "system" , recharging a battery of a cellphone
> or a Laptop in 5 seconds, even a electric car will be recharged in
> about 5 minutes instead of 7 to 8 hours. It will be available in
> 2011 and revolutionary. Will it be the end for Satrad ? No of course
> not, but probably the end of oil and gasoline.
check that
albums.fm/radio.html