Rogers Likes Agriculture Over Oil and Gold 16 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Famed investor Jim Rogers was on Bloomberg yesterday and had a few thoughts on oil, gold, and his new book - A Gift to My Children: A Father's Lessons for Life and Investing.
I don't know if this is going to be as bad as the 1930s - it may well be. But a rally is not unusual at a time like this. We've certainly seen a bottom. Is this the bottom? I don't think so. I think we're going to see more bottoms in the next few years. Of those two I would rather own oil. The IMF is trying to sell its gold. The IMF is one of the largest holders of gold, so you’ve got this huge supply overhang. Whether they sell it or not, the world is expecting them to sell it, so I'd rather own oil than gold. 00:00 Inflation; Asia; agricultural commodities
That's not a very flattering freeze-frame above - parts 2 and 3 are also available at YouTube.
For at least the last year or so, he's been pretty consistent about his favorite investment over the short-term and there were no changes today - agricultural commodities.
On market bottoms:
On whether to hold oil or gold through the rest of the year:
...
I would expect to see more problems. Probably this fall or next year we're going to see currency problems. We're going to see more bankruptcies, so there are going to be more problems in the financial markets which does not mean that we can't have big rallies.
We're having one.
I don't know how much longer it's going to last. I am not participating - at least in the stock part of the rally. I'm participating by buying commodities because, if the world economy is going to be better, commodities are going to be the best place to be. If the world economy is not going to be better, commodities are still going to be the best place to be, or at least the least bad place to be.
Apparently he hasn't heard about the willing buyers in Asia for all the IMF gold - that seems to be the consensus opinion of nearly all who have commented on this subject. Interestingly, for as far back as I remember, Rogers has never been real bullish on gold simply because, in his view, central banks have too much of it and are more than happy to continue to sell it.
I'd rather own agriculture than either.
It's a half-hour long interview - here's the summary:
06:21 Investors should expect more "bottoms"
08:40 Commodities; U.S. stocks, bonds "last bubble"
13:24 Japan love hotels, stocks; Thai politics
18:09 Currency crisis; agriculture, China strategy
26:27 Prefer oil to gold; China, Brazil real estate
28:44 Angola. Ethiopia; U.S. bailouts, economy
Related Articles
|

























The common sense analysis of commodities will always point to the only sure thing hit in the world. Oil! We can't grow or more of it. Despite what you hear, there is no viable substitute for it in the foreseeable future, at least not to power production equipment, and every commodity we produce or extract first has to be powered with oil burning heavy equipment. If you are bent on owning commodities, better take oil, its by far your best bet.
A pretty simplistic analysis, but the best I can do for now.
On a more immediate basis, agri commodities (corn, beans, rice)should hold up well this year. Stay away from cotton.
On the other hand ... oil isn't going to skyrocket in the near term. World GDP, US GDP is falling.
Now about the farm land I have in SE Arkansas ...
But, if there were ever a real "rush for the exits" from stocks and bonds, the amount of money on the move would sop up central banks' supply in a day. Or an hour.
Probably gold won't make a big move soon, but only when the crowd is about to move. That'll require sharp declines first in stocks and bonds. Maybe by year-end.
As for gold, the gold the IMF sells will not have a problem finding a home but the gold market as a whole is going to go down before it goes up. The ETFs risk killing gold actually because they are converting it into a paper product that can be bought and sold like a stock with all of a stock's volatility. We may see gold at $2000 or $3000 one day but you'll need to be quick because it will be drop like rock after the mania subsides unless there is a re-valuation by central banks.
"recent level of facination with the abstract" and "as fundamental values are reembraced".
President Obama should repeat these gems over and over until he and his administrative brain trust start to understand basic economics, in contrast to financial alchemy.
On Apr 14 09:49 AM Allan Frain wrote:
> Without speculating on the market's current direction it it easily
> seen that its recent level of fascination with the abstract is over.
> As fundamental values are reembraced by the market there is nothing
> whose value is so fundamental as food and water.