Do Goldman's Earnings Signal Top of Sucker's Rally? 12 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
When China made its $3 billion investment in Blackstone Group this just had to mark the top of the private equity bubble. It did.
Likewise Goldman Sachs (GS) raising money from shareholders off the back of the best Wall Street rally since 1933 ought to invite the same degree of skepticism. Is Goldman about to use its super profits from the first quarter rally to generate enthusiasm for a stock issue whose value is bound to fall off the edge of a cliff as this sucker’s rally comes to its logical conclusion: another massive plunge downwards like the summer of 1930? Let us not forget that global trade fell by more than it did in 1930 in the first quarter, and global GDP is crumbling. There is no recovery, this is a slump. Stocks will not rally higher in this global economic crisis. Goldman is a tremendous trading house and trying to second guess them is perhaps also an exercise for suckers. But humble logic can flaw the greatest genius. Recapitalization outside of government intervention is the holy grail for global banking at present, and HSBC’s (HBC) successful mega rights issue shows that the bold can still be beautiful in raising funds. And it is true that Goldman has delivered long term performance for its shareholders and indeed was the last investment bank still standing on Wall Street in the crash. Whether that means now is the moment for shareholders to put up new money is another issue. If, as this website argued over the weekend, this is just a sucker’s rally then buying Goldman stock at the top of such a rally is clearly going to prove to be fool’s gold. In a true bear market it could be many years until shares regain their current nominal values again, and even that may obscure real value erosion by inflation. The point is surely not that Goldman Sachs is not a great company, or that the house is not fantastic at trading a massive rally like the one in the first quarter, but simply that investors at this time risk overpaying like the Chinese did for Blackstone by jumping into private equity just as that particular game was up. Indeed, stock in Goldman Sachs might be available later this year at far more attractive price levels, so why buy now?
Related Articles
|






















LOL... Who's "second guessing"? When Goldman is SELLING, do you want to be BUYING?
I assume most here are traders, rather than pure retail.
For us, this is not a suckers rally, it is a time to trade.
G
Was 1933 the year of a larger rally or was it 1930?
Anyway, the parallels should send chills up and down spines, if you'll pardon the outworn metaphor.
My guess is that most of the free traders on this board are closet socialists and are betting that the government can save the financial system by throwing massive amounts of tax payer money at the banking oligarchs.
Life is full of the strangest surprises. Remember when all those Soviet Communists became oligarchs after 1989?
Count on U.S. finance oligarchs becoming banking commissars if the United States financial system collapses under the weight of so much debt, and also count on these oligarchs, and the pilot fish investing community, finding a way to save their financial bacon.
A lot of people on this board are dumb, but they aren't stupid.
We have made beautiful money nevertheless.
Review the author's series of articles. For months, he has been beating the same, tired old drum. Buy Gold! Buy Gold! Buy Gold! Back in December he was predicting Dow 4,000, and Gold at $5,000 an ounce (are you friggin' kidding me??). Read this articles, and think for yourselves people. This author, and many others, simply have an agenda to push.
people care about making money. Roubini has a dead wrong perspective as well.
On Apr 15 01:01 AM Peter Cooper wrote:
> Thanks for the last comment billyboy54 - I try to make being sat
> in Arabia an advantage in that I can take a different view if nothing
> else. Not being a market trader also has advantages in terms of perspective!