Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Remember how, a few days ago, we were all feeling just a tiny bit optimistic about where the economy was going? Well, you can forget about feeling that way for awhile, at least as far as the media business is concerned. Today brings multiple pieces of hope-deflating news.

ZenithOptimedia released a revised version of its closely-watched global ad-spending forecast yesterday, and the new view projects a year-over-year decrease of 6.9 percent, the biggest drop since Zenith started keeping track in 1980. The declines will be sharper still in the U.S. (down 8.7 percent), in newspapers (down 12 percent) and in magazines (down 11 percent).

But those forecasts sound mild compared with the actual first-quarter numbers reported, or soon to be reported, by print publishers. Magazines collectively recorded a 25.9 percent plunge in ad pages in the first quarter, with revenue falling 20.2 percent, according to the Publishers Information Bureau. Check out the chart of individual magazine totals; the percent change numbers without a minus sign in front of them are few and far between.

And things are looking just as bad, if not worse, for newspaper publishers, most of whom will be reporting their own first-quarter results in the next few days. The New York Times says average revenue percent declines with be in the mid-20s, with a lot of big papers hitting 30 percent

Print this article with comments

This article has 2 comments:

  •  
    Jeff:
    What papers do you predict will report being down 30% in ad revenues in the first quarter ? I haven't seen that number anywhere, you often throw around numbers with no basis in fact. There will be NO MAJOR PAPERS reporting revenue losses of 30% for the first quarter. Pure poppycock and speculation on your part.

    jay fredrickson
    washingtoncheap.com
    Apr 16 08:54 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    This trend is almost two years old... if you remove the artificial political campaign ad spending, which masked the decline.
    Apr 16 09:26 PM | Link | Reply