Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) is an old favorite of momentum hounds. From Q1 of 2003 to Q3 2008, the company was the Joe DiMaggio of Wall Street, beating estimates for 23 straight quarters by pretty whopping margins.

In fact, the streak was probably longer than that, but I don't have access to the data.

But the good times stopped rolling on January 7, 2009. The company preannounced preliminary Q4 results that were below expectations, with CEO Lonnie Smith making the following statement:

Our system sales in the quarter reflect the challenging global economic and financial market environment. At this point, we believe that uncertainty in global economic markets will make forecasting system placements difficult into 2009. Procedure growth remained strong worldwide. We continue to believe that procedures are the leading indicator for the strength of our business.

And what happened this morning? The company dramatically missed earnings and revenue expectations due to "$20.1 million of revenue deferrals associated with offers made to certain customers to upgrade their recently purchased da Vinci(r) S(tm) Surgical Systems to our recently announced da Vinci(r) Si(tm) Surgical System."

$20.1 million? Is there a reason they decided not to announce this important piece of data sooner?

It's time to face facts. The ISRG party is over.

Take a look at this chart, which measures ISRG's actual earnings relative to estimates. See the trend into negative territory? Failing to beat expectations is the absolute death's knell for any momentum stock, and ISRG has now missed twice in a row.

Momentum stocks are built around consistent earnings beats, and it's obvious that ISRG's best days are behind it. It is simply not delivering the big quarters, and the economy is hurting demand for its innovative, but expensive surgical systems.

And don't count out the psychological impact of the revenue deferral. It doesn't matter one bit if it all gets recognized by the company this year. Investors hate anything that makes analyzing a company's financials more difficult - just take a look at what a mess Electronic Arts' (ERTS) numbers are with those nonsensical revenue deferrals.

Just be careful when you get those analysts' reports reiterating Buy recommendations, with lowered earnings estimates. I've been a sucker myself for momentum stocks that lost their juice - in fact I still have nightmares about Rackable Systems (RACK), GFI Group (GFIG), and the big Daddy of them all, Zoltek (ZOLT).

Don't be as dumb as I was.

Tune out the spin, because ISRG is toast..

(disclosure: no positions in any names mentioned)

Print this article with comments

This article has 31 comments:

  •  
    I don't agree with you concerning Intuitive Surgical Statement.
    Intuitive Surgical is acting on a market with no competitor. Their product and brand has great value.
    But due to the credit market crisis, Hospital cannot purchase as much Da Vinci product as they would like (don't forget the price) but over the long term, their product clearly has a great market growth potential. Look at the margin too.
    The management is doing a great job of securing any new technology or patent with their R&D or their strong balance Sheet to keep their huge competitive advantage.
    I do believe that ISRG is just hit as a momemtum stock because the overall market is in a bear market; Don't try to make as if you are predicting the end of the momemtum stock, it is just a bear market that hit every stock (including momemtum stock that takes a big hit in their P/E ratio).

    Over the long Term, ISRG is a great stock to hold because :
    - Market growth potential
    - Competitive Advantage
    - Huge Growth Margin
    - Solid Balance Sheet
    - Solid Management
    - Ability to continue to keep their competitive advantage
    - The future effect of the unfreeze credit market
    - The prospect of upgrade of technology in the Hospital

    :)
    It is all about Fundamental after all, and Intuitive Surgical has huge fundamentals.... :)
    Apr 17 06:37 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I don't agree with you either. In addition to the previous comments, I would point to several facts, including massive 60% procedure growth, strong international demand, continued innovation (the reason for the deferrals), steady pricing, great cashflow, continued outside leasing sources, high repeat purchases on the systems and steady margin guidance despite uncertainty on volumes.

    When the company was just beginning its growth phase, it suggested that the maximum any institution would buy would be 3 machines, but they now have two customers with 5. This technology, a monopoly, is becoming the gold standard. The company continues to plow its massive profits back into R&D, and the returns on its investment continue to be massive.

    I sold my stock earlier this week between 114 and 120. I had hoped to buy it back before they reported, but the snafu of the early release got in my way (luckily I think, given the drop in AH). I plan to be buying the dip this morning. I bought for the first time in years when they reported in January, but I first became involved in the name in early 2005 and have nothing but the highest respect for this management team and their mission.
    Apr 17 06:52 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    One more thing - it is quite rare to be able to talk about a growth company at this phase of its life-cycle on a free cash yield basis. I urge you and other readers to take a look at the free cash flow relative to the enterprise value. It's a joke.
    Apr 17 06:56 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Even if Obama does manage to socialize medicine (well, finish socializing medicine) in the US, there are still going to be plenty of private hospitals here and elsewhere in the world who will cater to the wealthy and who will be able to afford ISRG's products and services...has ISRG hit a rough patch? sure...along with 95%+ of the rest of the companies in the world, but that doesn't - presto! - turn a really well-run company into a dud overnight...I've got shares of ISRG that I purchasedat over $200 per share and some that I picked up at ~$90, and if it dips back to the $90 range again because of this, I'll buy more...I can't do a cute little chart about why that's what I'm doing; just trying to apply a little common sense.
    Apr 17 08:02 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Thw writer sounds like a jilted momo investor. I never bought. Was tempted when it was below 100. Thinking about it now.
    Apr 17 08:05 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    And we shall not be as dumb as you were, are or, will continue to be! Best that you get some "momentum" into your research on this company prior to declarations about what is and what ain't "toast". The only thing the air surrounding your little story may be redolent with is you being hoist by your own petard.
    Apr 17 09:00 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    And we shall not be as dumb as you were, are or, will continue to be! Best that you get some "momentum" into your research on this company prior to declarations about what is and what ain't "toast". The only thing the air surrounding your little story may be redolent with is you being hoist by your own petard.
    Apr 17 09:00 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    And we shall not be as dumb as you were, are or, will continue to be! Best that you get some "momentum" into your research on this company prior to declarations about what is and what ain't "toast". The only thing the air surrounding your little story may be redolent with is you being hoist by your own petard.
    Apr 17 09:01 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If the company is so great - why would you sell the stock?


    On Apr 17 06:52 AM Alan Brochstein wrote:

    > I don't agree with you either. In addition to the previous comments,
    > I would point to several facts, including massive 60% procedure growth,
    > strong international demand, continued innovation (the reason for
    > the deferrals), steady pricing, great cashflow, continued outside
    > leasing sources, high repeat purchases on the systems and steady
    > margin guidance despite uncertainty on volumes.
    >
    > When the company was just beginning its growth phase, it suggested
    > that the maximum any institution would buy would be 3 machines, but
    > they now have two customers with 5. This technology, a monopoly,
    > is becoming the gold standard. The company continues to plow its
    > massive profits back into R&D, and the returns on its investment
    > continue to be massive.
    >
    > I sold my stock earlier this week between 114 and 120. I had hoped
    > to buy it back before they reported, but the snafu of the early release
    > got in my way (luckily I think, given the drop in AH). I plan to
    > be buying the dip this morning. I bought for the first time in years
    > when they reported in January, but I first became involved in the
    > name in early 2005 and have nothing but the highest respect for this
    > management team and their mission.
    Apr 17 09:31 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Yes, I am jilted. But I'm learning from my screw-ups...


    On Apr 17 08:05 AM wobatus wrote:

    > Thw writer sounds like a jilted momo investor. I never bought. Was
    > tempted when it was below 100. Thinking about it now.
    Apr 17 09:31 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The company is obviously at a slowing stage of its lifecycle.


    On Apr 17 06:56 AM Alan Brochstein wrote:

    > One more thing - it is quite rare to be able to talk about a growth
    > company at this phase of its life-cycle on a free cash yield basis.
    > I urge you and other readers to take a look at the free cash flow
    > relative to the enterprise value. It's a joke.
    Apr 17 09:32 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I sold because I trade a lot. I bought and 85, sold at 105, bought back at 92 or something like that. My sale at 120 isn't a reflection of my long-term views but rather trying to be opportunistic going into the number. It smelled to me like some serious short-covering. While I didn't expect a disaster, I also was fairly sure we wouldn't see a great quarter either. Hopefully, I can get back in at an opportune time. Sometimes I win, sometimes I lose in those efforts.


    On Apr 17 09:31 AM Michael Comeau wrote:

    > If the company is so great - why would you sell the stock?
    Apr 17 10:14 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Your statement is so far from the truth, Michael. They are still in the early stages of adoption moving towards only mainstream acceptance now. Their share of the potential market ultimately is still quite low. It will take years for doctors to become even more proficient and to use the machine in even more ways. The fact that they are "slowing" is a result of external factors and not a consequence of slowing demand. The only thing slowing is the desire to spen and/or availability of money to spend from hospitals. The fact that so many of their placements were to repeat customers drives home the value proposition, while new customers, not surprisingly, are paralyzed - for now.


    On Apr 17 09:32 AM Michael Comeau wrote:

    > The company is obviously at a slowing stage of its lifecycle.
    Apr 17 10:18 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    ISRG is toast!...Wow!...Some people will write (almost) anything to get attention. Doesn't someone at SA screen author's contributions?
    Apr 17 10:52 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Hey, the Author made a bold prediction for which I respect him, but obviously was very wrong. Personally, I just do not understand what part of a monopoly in breakthrough, disruptive, futurist, high growth technology that people do not understand. I almost get the impression that this author did not know what product he was talking about and only looked at the numbers in a down market. In this case the mistake would be understandable.
    Apr 17 01:13 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Now, presumably, you understand the meaning of "deferred" in the context of ISRG's latest release. I assume you listened to the conference call? Bad kneejerk move my friend. This is money in the bank. Intuitives kind jesture to allow customers who recently purchased the Da Vinci S, to upgrade to the second quarter's latest and greatest release forced them to postpone recognition of a great deal of operating earnings (20 mil), until customers decide whether they want to upgrade or not. Are you now going to issue a retraction?
    Apr 17 02:02 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Now, presumably, you understand the meaning of "deferred" in the context of ISRG's latest release. I assume you listened to the conference call? Bad kneejerk move my friend. This is money in the bank. Intuitives kind jesture to allow customers who recently purchased the Da Vinci S, to upgrade to the second quarter's latest and greatest release forced them to postpone recognition of a great deal of operating earnings (20 mil), until customers decide whether they want to upgrade or not. Are you now going to issue a retraction?
    Apr 17 02:02 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Great call! ...NOT!
    Apr 17 02:14 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Good Call Mate!!!

    ZOLT will be the next stock in your article to take off!!!
    Apr 17 02:14 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    ...well, gee, it's up over 11 bucks as of 3 pm...guess those poor fools don't know what they're in for, huh?
    Apr 17 02:58 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    For the record, I feel the egg on my face. But I'm sticking to my guns...
    Apr 17 03:08 PM | Link | Reply
  •  

    ...gosh, closed up $12.35...well, good thing egg and toast goes toether so well...LOL!

    On Apr 17 03:08 PM Michael Comeau wrote:

    > For the record, I feel the egg on my face. But I'm sticking to my
    > guns...
    Apr 17 04:03 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Michael Corneau..... The economy is at a slowing stage of its lifecycle.....
    And by the way me i didn t sold my shares and i m more then happy when i see the jump.
    When The market will be in a bull mode (which is not the case now even with this rally) This stock will go back to his all time highs.

    I m not a trader so my position are only based on long term fundamental, i apply real buy and hold.... and it pays really well and ISRG is one of the major stock i hold for the long term. I waited to see it dip below 120 i was enough lucky to pick it below 100..... now i plan to hold it for a LONG time


    On Apr 17 09:32 AM Michael Comeau wrote:

    > The company is obviously at a slowing stage of its lifecycle.
    Apr 17 07:31 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    This is a great quarter. This is a bad year. Obama, Emanual,and Janet Reno #2 are in charge. Fidel, Hugo, Assad, are our new friends. ISRG is gaining in customer demand. CC outlined the money collected by providers with and without DV's. Greedy hospital administrator's will not miss this profit opportunity. 700 DV's can be upgraded and doctors are very influential.
    Remember this Michael Comeau character and do the opposite. He belongs in the Bozo Bin.
    Watch for the heart business to go into orbit. Research Catholic Hospital in Tyer Texas. JMHO
    Apr 18 01:56 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    wow another dumb analsyt, probably choking on this article today after seeing what isrg closed at. i paid 93 for it
    Apr 18 05:02 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Well I got it at $14 @ share and you know what, I like toast!
    Apr 20 12:30 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Obviously the days of ISRG at $300 are over, that's when it was a momentum stock. If anything it's been a momentum stock going down ever since, but it looks like it bottomed out at $90.

    Buying now is buying a growth stock, not a momentum stock.
    Apr 21 01:06 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    this is about the dumbest piece of investment writing i've ever read. are people at seeking alpha actually paid to do this??? this is opinion sans fundamental knowlege masquerading as financial information. it really stinks.. hire someone who knows what he's talking about.
    Apr 24 02:32 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    FAir enough. Takes courage. At least you put your opinions out there. Obviously, sub-100, in retorspect, was a good deal. All the best.


    On Apr 17 09:31 AM Michael Comeau wrote:

    > Yes, I am jilted. But I'm learning from my screw-ups...
    Apr 30 06:23 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Obama is going to cut payments to medical vendors even if they spend fortunes on lobbies, healthcare is doom.
    May 01 06:32 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Looks like the party is back on.....
    Sep 09 04:49 PM | Link | Reply