Seeking Alpha
About this author:
Submit
an article to

And some readers call Zero Hedge pessimistic:

April 16 (Bloomberg) -- David Tice, the chief portfolio strategist for bear markets at Federated Investors Inc., said the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index will probably plunge about 62 percent.

He spoke during a Bloomberg Television interview today. The Federated Prudent Bear Fund that he founded returned 6.7 percent last year as the S&P 500 plunged 38 percent, the most since 1937.

Tice said the benchmark index for U.S. stocks may slump to about 325. It closed today at 865.30. The measure has surged 28 percent since March 9, the most in five weeks since the 1930s.

Print this article with comments
Comments
30
Older > Comments 1 - 20 out of 30
You are viewing the latest 20 comments
  •  
    Wait for the crash of US commercial real estate, which analysts think will happen by autumn this year. Its unfolding now!

    Shops are closing down and there's no one to rent them. Companies are retrenching and freeing up a lot of office space or closing down entirely and vacating even more precious office space with no one to rent it again. Huge skyscrapers are becoming ghost-scrapers.

    All this expensive commercial real estate is mortgaged to the hilt. With no rental income coming in, the loans against them will become difficult to service and there will be fearsome default. There's insurance and re-insurance here also and the amounts involved are mind-boggling. No bailout plan would come even close.
    When the commercial real estate collapse comes, all heck will break loose. And if multinationals like General Motors and Crysler call it a day, it won't just be thousands upon thousands of people unemployed (though its heartless to use the word 'just' here). Two entire towns will be become ghost towns. That's terrible. If you count the number of people - wives, children and parents - who are dependent on those incomes, it becomes worse than terrible. It becomes absolutely and totally incomprehesible. So, I concur on a 500 or less S&P 500.

    But what's amazing is that America remains mired in stunning denial. This is a process that will fall like dominos.
    Two options will remain and the end "debt default" or "trigger a war".

    Apr 17 08:55 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    On Apr 17 06:13 AM Fighting Yoda wrote:
    > Also he gave data about total mutual fund redemptions - only about
    > $100B, suggesting lot more redemptions will happen - leading to the
    > final capitulation.

    Absolutely. Capitulation has in no way happened. We will know it when we see it:
    * Magazines will proclaim the "death" of the stock market
    * Investors will want to hear nothing about stocks
    * Mutual fund shares will be redeemed by the boatload
    In short, all hope will be crushed. This is not the situation we're in right now.
    Apr 17 10:33 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    With all the differing opinions coming from all corners it should be obviously by now that there is nobody who really "knows" what the bottom will be, if it has already occured, or, if not, when it might actually occur. During times of economic stress or euphoria (I assume we can at least agree on which scenario describes the present), the market generally overreaches its intrinsic value. In other words, at market tops the price investors are willing to pay for a dollar of expected earnings is usually high relative to the net present value of future cash flows. Often, at market highs the P/E ratio exceed 20 (and in rare cases 30 or more). Conversely, the historical lows at market bottoms usually get below 12 (usually between 8 and 11).

    One year ago, the consensus for 2009 S&P 500 earnings was at about $94 (aggregated EPS for 1 share of each of the 500 companies in the index). Recently consensus stood at around $50 for 2009. If we use a P/E of 11 (on the high side considering the strength and duration of this downturn) one would expect a low of around 550 for the S&P 500. If the earnings turn out to be optimistic and consensus continues to fall to around $40, and if one then considers this downturn to be harsher than normal applying a P/E of 8, we end up with the S&P at 320.

    I am not in any way trying to suggest that I agree with the projection of 325 vs SP. I am just trying to lend some understanding of how one might come up with such a number. For me, anything in the range of 300-600 would be within the realm of possible for the final bottom.

    Having said that, I have to concur with commentor, Carlos Lam, that we have not seen a true capitulation phase to end this bear market. I served two tours in Vietnam and have been a student of the markets ever since, so my experience of having observed several capitulations tells me something: you ain't seen nothing yet!

    Unemployment is still rising. The CRE debt defaults are just beginning as retail and office space vacancies rise dramatically. Residential real estate value continue to spiral downward and the peak for forclosures may still be a year ahead of us. Credit card defaults (currently 8.8%) have a strong coorelation with unemployment and are heading north of 10% to give the banks even more to worry about. Americans are starting to save and pay down their debt (about time) which is good for the long term but will take at least of couple of points out of GDP in the short term. Consumers are learning to make choices and forgoing or putting off discretionary purchases. If the economy does not turn around soon, many consumers' buying habits will have evolved into a permenant sort of thriftiness. I just don't see where the "good" news is coming from in all of this.

    And if you think I'm a bear wanting the worst to happen, think again! I own close to 100 houses. I am getting ravaged as badly as anyone out there. I am still above water because I don't have any mortgages.

    But, yes, I am looking for trading opportunities in the market. I buy into the rallies until I think I see an inflection point. Then I sell. I watch for the weakness that I thought I perceived to take hold and then I go short. Right now, I'm mostly out but considering going back in on the short side because once the major banks have all reported earnings I see very little to continue to support the current rally. The banks all want to raise more capital in secondary offerings while their stock prices are pumped up a bit. Once the dilution is recognized for what it is, their stock could sink again taking the rest of the market with them.

    I'll go long when I've seen "real" capitulation. I don't expect to need to be too good at the timing game because I have a sense that this bottoming process is going take much longer than the bulls would like. It will tire out even the strongest bulls. Well, what do you know - that is the definition of capitulation, after all!
    Apr 17 12:06 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    It is entirely possible the S&P500 may plunge to 325. I recently wrote an article about the possibility of it going to 100:

    www.prosperitybypen.co...

    Apr 17 12:16 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Since the Fed & Treasury are the only significant players now, it would be nice if they just published a 30 day forecast for where they are going to take the market...
    Apr 17 12:16 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Carlos Lam and Mark Bern - - -

    Good comments about capitulation. That is often what it takes to make a final bottom. However, sometimes a bear dies with a whimper, not a growl. Examples are 1932 and 1982.

    At other times the rise from the bottom has been gradual, such as in 1957, 1963, and 2003.

    Doug Short has excellent charts showing these markets:
    dshort.com/charts/bear...
    dshort.com/charts/bear...
    dshort.com/charts/bear...

    TheFounder and Moon Kil Woong - - -

    My personal prognostication would be somewhere in between the two pictures you describe. I would make a rough prognostication as follows:
    * TheFounder projection 30% probability (multiply each of those numbers by 0.3).
    * Moon Kil Woong projection of 50% probability the market is going up from here, again weighted by 30% (ie, 15% probable).
    * Probability of 40% that the market will follow a path none of this discussion is considering.

    Disclosure: I may have over estimated the first two projections and underweighted the third.
    Apr 17 02:02 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Anyone who accurately forecasts the bottom should not be hailed as a seer or prophet. Anyone who nails it will have made a lucky guess. If they believe otherwise, ask them to be so kind as to peg the next 2 or 3 bottoms for you.
    Apr 17 04:06 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Talking his book? Or booking his opinion?


    On Apr 17 04:34 AM User 369959 wrote:

    > Notice - he may have a conflicted interest - he created a Bear fund!
    Apr 17 05:41 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Capitulation is a mind set not a number. It must start with the realization that the government has blow it, the people have been suckered and the markets will never come back. Not even close yet. The current clowns in Washington must be completely and utterly discredited. so far they are looked at by the masses as their saviors. Watch in horror when they learn the truth.
    Apr 17 09:07 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    John - thanks for the graph links. Pretty good for reality checks.



    On Apr 17 02:02 PM John Lounsbury wrote:

    > Carlos Lam and Mark Bern - - -
    >
    > Good comments about capitulation. That is often what it takes to
    > make a final bottom. However, sometimes a bear dies with a whimper,
    > not a growl. Examples are 1932 and 1982.
    >
    > At other times the rise from the bottom has been gradual, such as
    > in 1957, 1963, and 2003.
    >
    Apr 17 10:07 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    So what would restore confidence more than a traditonal violent war?

    How about a casualty free War on world wide poverty?

    Or does that make too much sense?

    Friar Hilarius
    Apr 17 11:02 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    According to a popular online site sales of Ayn Rand are increasing and the desire of Americans for friendship is reducing

    This is a disastrous trend showing evidence of denial

    In a downturn interdependence should increase not reduce

    Instead the doctrine of irrational "self interest" ... and the devil take the hindmost is rampant

    This is no recipe for recovery either within America or globally

    Immorality in business behaviour has brought America to its knees with escalating unemployment

    Yet cut-throat economics (disguised as "rational self interest") is gaining in popularity

    Free markets have failed ... and the only way out as FDR saw was through Government doing what individuals have clearly failed to do

    The cycle of despair will only increase until Americans decide to work together within US borders ... and a similar ethic is embraced globally

    "Rational" self interest is a snare and delusion ... and could result in animal like behaviour, civil disorder and violence

    Human beings are becoming their own worst enemies
    Apr 18 03:45 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Everyone is calling for recovery in fall 2009.

    Everyone is ALWAYS WRONG.
    Apr 18 01:29 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    conceptwizard nailed the major remaining obstacle in his comment above: commercial real estate. Not all of it is heavily mortgaged, but enough is to create bone chilling fear in the hearts of anyone who sits down to calculate the numbers. Worse, it involves another set of players than C, BAC and WFC, players who didn't buy themselves the ultimate insurance: taxpayer bailouts.

    The government can't bail out every lender - our children's inheritance was already spent propping up the inefficient and corrupt Wall Street Five.

    The CRE bust will result in more wealth destruction without intervention than we could have imagined possible.
    Apr 18 02:59 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Guys, the low is there waiting at 530...

    Leave your buy orders there @ SPY and prepare "thank you" notes for me.

    My charts are rarely wrong and they show the bottom at 530. Sell into this fools rally.
    Apr 18 11:47 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    don't you think this happened at the proir bottom


    On Apr 17 10:33 AM Carlos Lam wrote:

    > On Apr 17 06:13 AM Fighting Yoda wrote:
    Apr 19 11:32 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    What is the value of a company struggling to keep producing or of a half empty commercial building where people continue to work as usual?

    People should recognize that a struggling company is more valuable than cash getting minimum interests or merchandises and services generating no added real values to society. Why would people pay $1K for an oz of gold, or over hundreds or even thousand dollars for still another fashion handbag or luxury oversea vacation, or over $3 for a gallon of gas, instead of for 1000 shares of a company generating real employment?

    Rather than just looking at accounting numbers, we should use more common sense regarding values, to help the recovery. Complicate accounting and investing schemes are partly responsible for getting us into this financial problem.
    Apr 19 02:54 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    if i ran a bear fund i would likely paint a worst case scenario as well, but i would probably be able to return more than 6.5% in a near apocalyptic year.
    Apr 19 04:16 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    anything is possible. what's your point?


    On Apr 17 12:16 PM Ted Kavadas wrote:

    > It is entirely possible the S&P500 may plunge to 325. I recently
    > wrote an article about the possibility of it going to 100:
    >
    > www.prosperitybypen.co...;P500_Target_of_100.html
    >
    Apr 19 05:14 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Returning 6.7% with a bear fund amid the greatest stock market crash of the last decades is a shocking performance! I am not demanding a leveraged 38% times x return, but everybody who took the fund as a hedge against their portfolios will have little reason to celebrate. And in the next bull market the fund will lose - how much? certainly more than 6.7% Go figure, buying some otm put options for protection would have served better. If the guy really saw such a stock market catastrophe coming, he must have made much more on it. after all, isn't the purpose of a bear fund to just get the few big declines right?
    May 06 06:35 AM | Link | Reply
Viewing Comments 1-20 out of 30 Older comments >