CNET's exposure to Spitzer's attack on Adware: more details

Includes: CNET, TCX
by: David Jackson

Industry insiders contacted me about CNET Network's potential legal exposure to Adware/Spyware following Eliot Spitzer's suit against Intermix (ticker: MIX) and the Internet Stock Blog's discussion of stocks at risk from Spitzer's attack on Adware. Key points from the conversations:

  • CNET's is its largest individual web site.
  • Revenue streams: page-view driven advertising and payments from software vendors, perhaps on a per-download basis.
  • Sources say (I haven't corroborated this): was one of the largest distributors of Kazaa, file-sharing software that was bundled with increasing amounts of Adware and Spyware.
  • Is it possible that CNET didn't know about the Adware/Spyware bundled with programs on Unlikely. The programs were bloated, and some insiders think that CNET was paid on a per-download basis. How else would these programs generate profits if not from Adware/Spyware?
  • Could CNET have had a cleaner Adware policy? Certainly. Elliot Noss, CEO of competitor Tucows, which has the second largest download site after, claims that:
"It is [and was] our policy (published in the ratings guide) not to accept software that we deem to be intrusive adware: This type of software installs data mining programs or third-party adware modules, usually identified as third-party adware. In other words, we do not accept spyware, and we reject some forms of adware."


CNET chart below.

Full disclosure: at the time of writing I'm short CNET.

Related resources for institutional investors:

  • Nitron Advisors
    arranges conference calls for institutional investors with frontline
    industry experts. Its panel of experts includes hundreds of Internet
    professionals with direct knowledge of new search technologies, auction methodologies, pay-per-click
    advertising, web partnership structures, e-commerce, and other Internet
    technologies. To be contacted with more info, please email