-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
President Obama is asking for $13 billion for a high-speed passenger rail system, saying its creation “will lead to innovations that change the way we travel in America.”
Proposed plans include linking Los Angeles and San Francisco with a high-speed rail that would make it only a two-hour trip. Below is a map of the ten high-speed corridors outlined in the President’s plan.

Train travel is already more popular than most people realize. Amtrak carried nearly 30 million passengers last year, up 11 percent from 2007. The chart below shows a steady upward trend since the mid-1990s.

The fastest growth has been on rail lines linking major cities less than 500 miles apart, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers. Such routes include the Boston-Washington corridor, the Bay Area to Sacramento and Milwaukee-Chicago.
In its 2009 infrastructure report, the ASCE gave America’s rail network a grade of “C-,” which is mediocre but nevertheless better than the “D” earned by America’s overall infrastructure.
The ASCE estimates that $63 billion in rail investment will be needed over the next five years to meet increasing passenger and freight demand.
About $51 billion has already been budgeted for rails, according to estimates, leaving roughly $12 billion in unmet need. That’s where President Obama’s proposal comes in – if it’s approved, there will be more than enough money for the necessary upgrades.
Related Articles
|

























This article has 10 comments:
Excellent piece. Well thought out and insightful.
Mark Borkowski, pres.
Mercantile Mergers & Acquisitions Corp
I King Street West, Suite 714
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 1A1
(416) 368-8466 ext. 232
mark@mercantilema.com
> jack
The short answer is a loud YES, and here’s a few good reasons why. Rail is much more fuel-efficient than cars, planes or trucks. Trains use 1/3 less fuel than trucks per ton-mile, half as much fuel per passenger mile over cars and planes, and pollute the atmosphere only half as much.
That may not impress many these days, but if you think oil and gas are past their peak in production, and prices will only climb in the decades ahead, this becomes a really big deal – even threatening our global position as an economic power. Trains are powered by relatively cheap and available diesel, just like trucks and planes, but trains can be converted to overhead electric wires, and powered by emerging alternate energy sources. That’s not an option for planes, or the vast majority of our current auto fleet.
Investments in our nations railroad networks that allow passenger trains to go 110+ mph, through the reduction of bottlenecks, also allow freight traffic to move more efficiently. Improvements to signal, safety, and grade crossings speed up both passenger trains, and freights.
As America moves towards more HSR service, dedicated tracks, with no grade crossings or conflicts with slower freights will emerge in certain corridors, allowing much higher speeds. But first we must walk, before we can run. This can be a huge first step.
Planes, cars, trucks and buses all have their place, each with their own strengths and weaknesses as modes of travel. The HSR initiative will gradually build upon our transportation network, offering alternatives for the future, and we as a nation will be better for it.
President Obama is wise beyond his years to make this investment, and America should thank him for his vision.
Mike Skehan, Member, All Aboard Washington
yes there is nothing more efficient than a steel wheel on a steel rail.
> jack
Mario Lapointe