Sirius Poised to Benefit from Auto Sector Upgrade 6 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
They say the wheels of justice turn slowly. The same can be said of Wall Street these days. Reinforcing an article I wrote several weeks ago, Goldman Sachs has called a bottom to the US auto industry.
Goldman Sachs upgraded the U.S. auto sector to "neutral" from "cautious," citing the likelihood of a bottom in auto sales, and also raised its rating on Ford Motor Co ((F):$3.80,00$0.11,002.98%) to "buy" as it expects the company to benefit the most from structural changes within the sector.
The firm's analysts agree with my assessment that Ford is best positioned to take market share from GM and Chrysler. This bodes well for Sirius XM (SIRI) because the Ford contract is much more beneficial to the company than the GM contract.
Goldman also increased its projected yearly auto sales estimate by up to 1 million units, putting the projected run rate at 11,000,000 units, based on the Obama administration's auto scrappage plan (which I also wrote about several weeks ago). Estimates in January were as low as 8.5 million units.
This is of paramount importance to Sirius XM investors. The January estimates could very well have resulted in negative subscriber growth for 2009. The newest estimates, if realized or exceeded, will certainly help Sirius XM reach their stated goal of achieving positive EBITDA before capex this year.
On a personal note I don't mean to sound egotistical, yet I have come under attack recently from people who don't put themselves out there in nearly the way that I do. They don't analyze or forecast. They don't report on any due diligence. Instead, they report on the news that I research. Everyone's got to make a living I guess.
Sirius XM shares were up nearly 10% Wednesday morning on the news.
Position: Long SIRI, F
Related Articles
|





















hernje, the problem I have with people like you is that you incurrage him to keep putting out that kind of garbage. You help in his short term memory. I say that because most after screwing up about that bankruptcy article after phase one of the Liberty deal was complete (off a boiler plate statement), would have made dam sure his ducks were in order before doing it ever again. But no what did we get next from him a article about SIRIXM lossing 2 MILLION net subs in 2009. He made a simple math error, that is something a average writer would try to get right. Then we have this mess about being able to totally reverse the Liberty deal. All he had to do is check the full agreement and not stop at a short version on the 8-K. Now what do I see, his mindless followers saying thats ok Brandon thats ok give us another shoty article. I say mindless because many of those same people were just bashing the WSJ, Barrons, ect., ect., ect., about them putting out those false articles. Even Bradon himself had a article here about the last bankruptcy article (that came out not to long ago) being bull crap. Basically they are cheering him on for doing the same crap they were bashing the other authers for doing. Now forgive me but if you cant see the illogic in that then you to are a idiot.