TXCO Resources Takes a Hit 10 comments
April 24, 2009
| about: TXCO
Submit
an article to
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
TXCO Resources (TXCO) looks like it may become the first casualty of the credit crunch in the exploration and production sector.
The company just received an acceleration notice from its lender demanding full repayment of the $150 million owed under the agreement, an amount the company does not have.
It's a shame since the company has some interesting properties in the Maverick Basin in Texas, and is also exposed to the Eagle Ford Shale.
Related Articles
|





















Don't throw out an accusation and don't follow it up. Remember, the mineral owners can always, always say "no" to any proposition presented by a broker. By the way, oil companies us "brokers" all the time. Sounds like you didn't have the sense to say "no".
Your comment shows that you don't understand what has been going on in the oil and gas land industry. Good luck with your thinking...
On Apr 28 05:10 PM Ben Eagle wrote:
> Hey, Third coast:
> Don't throw out an accusation and don't follow it up. Remember, the
> mineral owners can always, always say "no" to any proposition presented
> by a broker. By the way, oil companies us "brokers" all the time.
> Sounds like you didn't have the sense to say "no".
Now that we have that out of the way; please explain (detail) your remarks about the lease scam remarks that you think TXCO is using.
<<<TXCO has a land lease scam with its use of brokers who hire street people>>>
Then we will see if I don't understand, Hummmmm
On Apr 29 01:22 PM Third Coast wrote:
> Ben,
>
> Your comment shows that you don't understand what has been going
> on in the oil and gas land industry. Good luck with your thinking...
>
On Apr 30 11:21 AM Ben Eagle wrote:
> 3 coast:
> Now that we have that out of the way; please explain (detail) your
> remarks about the lease scam remarks that you think TXCO is using.
>
> <<<TXCO has a land lease scam with its use of brokers who hire street
> people>>>
>
> Then we will see if I don't understand, Hummmmm
>
> On Apr 29 01:22 PM Third Coast wrote: