Examining the 'Sell in May, Go Away' Axiom 15 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Where is the stock market heading? Has the rally that started in early March been exhausted? These are the key questions on all investors’ minds as financial markets remain caught between the frantic actions of central banks to get the cogs of the credit system and economy turning again on the one hand, and a still shaky economic and corporate outlook on the other.
It is therefore no wonder that even so-called “pop analysis”, including some legendary axioms, is resorted to in a quest for direction. And besides “buy low and sell high” few other axioms are more widely propagated than “sell in May and go away”. A Google search revealed an astounding 127,000 items featuring this phrase.
As equities have seen a particularly strong six-week rally, followed by what looks like the start of a consolidation/retracement of some of the recent gains, investors are justifiably questioning the market’s next move. And they nervously wonder whether this May will not only herald longer days in the Northern Hemisphere, but also live up to its reputation as the advent of a corrective phase in the markets.
The important issue, however, is whether this axiom actually has any scientific basis at all. Analyzing historical returns, the figures vary from market to market, but long-term statistics seem to show that the best time to be invested in equities is the six months from early November through to the end of April of the next year (”good” periods), while the “bad” periods normally occur over the six months from May to October.
A study of the MSCI World Index, a commonly used benchmark for global equity markets, reveals that since 1969 “good” periods returned +6.5% per annum while investors were actually in the red by -1.0% per annum during the “bad” periods.
“Sell in May and go away” also holds true for the US stock markets. An updated study by Plexus Asset Management of the S&P 500 Index shows that the returns of the “good” six-month periods from January 1950 to March 2009 were 7.9% per annum whereas those of the “bad” periods were 2.5% per annum.
A study of the pattern in monthly returns reveals that the “bad” periods of the S&P 500 Index are quite distinct, with five of the six months from May to October having lower average monthly returns than the six months of the good periods. Interestingly, May - the first month of the bad patch - is the only exception.
Click to enlarge:
Historical average returns from May to October in emerging markets also tended to be weaker than those from November to April, as shown in the graph below (hat tip: US Global Funds).

But what exactly does this mean for the investor who contemplates timing the market by selling in May and reinvesting in November? Further analysis shows that had one kept the investment in the S&P 500 Index only during the “good” six-month periods, and reinvested the proceeds in the money market during the “bad” six-month periods, the total return would have been 10.5% per annum.
These calculations do not take tax into account. And, of course, every time one switches out of and back into the stock market there are costs involved, which would also reduce the returns for the market timer.
How did the good and bad periods stack up during the past two years? The results are as follows.
• May 2007 - October 2007: +4.52%
• November 2007 - April 2008: -9.62%
• May 2008 - October 2008: -30.1%
• November 2008 - April 2009: -5.1%
Some you win, some you don’t! It seems that the axiom “sell in May and go away” in itself is a rather doubtful basis for timing equity investments. However, it may serve a useful purpose as input, together with other factors, to otherwise rational decision making.
Related Articles
|























Most investors big and small are down severely at this point in the 2009 calendar and I would expect them to stay in the game from May-Oct rather than go fishing...
On Apr 29 02:22 PM Cetin Hakimoglu wrote:
> 'Sell in May Go Away' axiom will fail this year. The momentum is
> overwhelmingly bullish and the economy is improving.
Moreover, speaking at the moment, if you've made some gains in the latest rally, it may be time to bring those puppies home. I can't see the current bear rally going much further and retrenchment could be fast and furious.
And, you know what, you can have a nice vacation sometime over the summer without worrying about whether your mufu or ETF is tanking. The stock market is far from the only place to gain satisfaction.
thats my scenario right now and of course my guess is as good as anyone else's.
On Apr 29 02:22 PM Cetin Hakimoglu wrote:
> 'Sell in May Go Away' axiom will fail this year. The momentum is
> overwhelmingly bullish and the economy is improving.
Maria Bartoromo on CNBC reported “the stock market is rallying on this great news that the “rate of advance” for the Taliban is slowing down. Whereas last week they were gaining 10 miles a week, this week they only came 5 miles closer to the Pakistani Nuclear weapons launch center.”
Jim Cramer added: “if this great news keeps up, I expect the Dow to rally past 10,000 by Mother’s Day. Also, analyst expect 5-10M deaths in the event the Taliban set off a nuclear weapon. However, if the actual fatalities come in at the low end of the range, this bull market could continue into the summer.”
On Apr 29 09:20 PM Donkey Kong wrote:
> Where do you find the time to post 1,359 comments Mr. Perma Bull?
>
>
The amount of posting and subsequent distaste is quite impressive, if only for shear volume.
Re: Sell in May and Go...
It sure looks like one should be in the market all year except for September and October, because May-August are all better months than those two.
Re: Sell in May... Or not
I thought this axiom was crap before I read this article, now I'm sure of it. The dow is down six quarters in a row, I wouldn't sell now unless something really bad happened (9/11? Swine Flu goes bonkers?) or I was forced at gunpoint (even less likely).