Automakers: Investment Risk 4 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Today's news about the automakers shows the inherent risk of investing.
First, there is the demise and restructuring of Chrysler. Chrysler will file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. As a result, Cerberus Capital Management will take a substantial loss. Some hedge funds, unwilling to admit the magnitude of their mistakes, will also incur losses.
Fiat will, in turn, form an alliance with a stake in the restructured Chrysler. Dealerships will be closed and auto-parts supplier contracts will probably be revised.
Secondly, a group of General Motors (GM) bondholders are making a counter-offer. The proposal gives the UAW a 41% equity stake, a 51% stake to bondholders and 1% to current shareholders. In blunt terms, if you own GM stock, this proposal essentially wipes out the value of your holdings.
Capitalism works by punishing those who make mistakes. Furthermore, stocks generate higher long-term returns by exposing investors to greater risk.
Both of these factors are at play today and show the inherent risk of investing. If you buy shares in a struggling company, you are likely to lose money. At the same time, bondholders get priority in bankruptcy. Shareholders might get the earnings, but it's the debtors who get the cash.
It's something to think about since Ford (F) is jumping today. After all, a messy General Motors bankruptcy could take the stock right back down.
There is nothing wrong with making speculative trades if you have money you are completely willing to lose. However, with so many fundamentally stable companies to choose from, and a wealth of information to help you make the right picks, it just doesn't make sense to take a large gamble on companies with big problems.
Cerberus is learning this lesson with Chrysler, and many individual investors are about to learn that lesson with GM.
Related Articles
|


























www.wealthalchemist.co.../
They are basically clueless. No matter bankruptcy now or not, they would not be able to survive in the market competition with the german and jap firms
But it still could appear to be a comedy of errors by the time Chrysler makes it through the gauntlet of bankruptcy court. It was painful enough for billions of taxpayer dollars going to prop up an American capitalist company in the business of manufacturing vehicles that, by most accounts, would appear to be in a downward spiral resulting in be a slow, painful crash, but Chrysler's storyline will not have a merciful ending for it really is, and has been, many things to many people. Not only was Congress determining by committee a myriad of regulations overseeing the final product but also a sense of push-me/pull-you as evidenced by management vs union. And if it was not bad enough that the current administration whipsawed Chrysler on its way to the barkruptcy court but somehow is giving the belief that Chrysler will be on the 'fast track' through the judicial system that is anticipating the merging of FIAT, an Italian manufacturer of adult-kiddie cars with an American machine that will be represented by dealerships that have somehow survived through a process of cut-throat, back-stabbing and luck. But worse, will be Chrsler's management role overseen by union through union eyes as well as a push by the invisible hands of the current administration, dictating what type of product it should sell, establishing the cost structure of manufacturing the product and the cost of selling the product as well as how the corporate structure should be established . . . all for the good of society.
Gotta go back to the line that describes the Chrysler story best . . .
Mr. President, this has disaster written all over it . . . albeit, in torturous, slow motion.