My Dividend Portfolio: The Good, The Bad 22 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
It has been close to three years since I started dividend focused investing. If I look at this from a 30 year+ investing cycle for individuals, then these three years may look like nothing. However, the continued anxiety and slide in one's portfolio value will turn our hair gray. I am learning that there will be winners and losers in our investment portfolios. All we have to do is minimize the losers.
Sysco Corporation (SYY): SYY was one of the most non-glamorous stocks when I had initiated my position. My current dividend yield on cost is 5.35%. As of March 2009, my total return has been 13.1% including dividends (my analysis).
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ): I had waited for close to one year to initiate a starter position in this company. It was worth the wait, and as the saying goes, every company will come down at some point in time. Its price has again come down and I am tempted to add some more, even though it has reached my allocation level. My current dividend yield-on-cost is 3.4%. As of March 2009, my total return has been 6% including dividends.
Consolidated Edison (ED): My objective was to just get a utility stock in my portfolio, and hence this was a no brainer purchase. I bought it during the market boom when slow growers like utility stocks were out of favor. I had read a lot about utility stock being less volatile and a slow grower, well this was a real example for me. My current dividend yield-on-cost is 6.9%. As of March 2009, my total return has been 12.9% including dividends.
Duke Energy (DUK): This was the second utility stock purchased during the same period. My current dividend yield-on-cost is 7.14%. As of March 2009, my total return has been 10.31% including dividends.
Health Care Property Investors Inc. (HCP): I had initiated a starter position in August 2006. Since then I have added twice to my allocation level. My current dividend yield on cost is 7.19%. As of March 2009, my total return has been 9.4%, including dividends.
Reality Income Corporation (O): This was my second REIT holding. My current dividend yield on cost is 6.83%. As of March 2009, my total return has been 8.3% including dividends.
National Retail Properties (NNN): My third REIT holding was in NNN. My current dividend yield on cost is 7.74%. As of March 2009, my total return has been 9.9% including dividends.
Beneath every rose lies a thorn. My portfolio resembles this proverb. The above holdings were the roses, while the thorns have been BAC, GE, WFC, WL, and C. While I sold C and WL, I continue to hold BAC, GE, and WFC. These stocks have not only suspended their dividends, but their stock prices also have gone for a toss.
Even if the markets turn back up, my hair will continue to remain gray!
Disclosure: The author owns BAC, GE, WFC, SYY, JNJ, ED, DUK, HCP, O and NNN.
Related Articles
|























This article has 22 comments:
On the flip side, the low valuations right now make it a great time to pick up some undervalued companies.
PastTense, check out some of the articles by Dividends4Life, and Dividends Growth Investor, as some starting points ideas on how to screen for good dividends stocks. Cliff Wachtel also has some great, detailed articles on dividend/income vehicles, spread across several asset classes.
Here's also a nice starting point from Scott's investments, which is an all ETF asset allocation type of income portfolio.
seekingalpha.com/artic...
I personally mix a large holding of dividend stocks, bond ETF/CEFs, REITS, MLPs, and a couple of CANROYS. I use Folio so as to minimize my trading fees. This makes better sense for me than owning an actively managed mutual fund, which often has high fees, and can be inflexible and slow to react to changing conditions.
There are alot of really seasoned, intelligent authors here on SeekingAlpha that offer some good starting points for building your own income based portfolio.
Here's some links to some dividend focused authors:
seekingalpha.com/autho...
seekingalpha.com/autho...
seekingalpha.com/autho...
seekingalpha.com/autho...
Oil/gas pipeline MLPs are another area that generates high yields, and they're less affected by oil/gas prices than one might think, since they generate fees based on usage, rather than the price of whatever flows through them. To an extent, they're somewhat like a utility, in that their rates are regulated, and there are barriers to competition. The downside is that they tend to be capital intensive.
Once again thanks for the article.
On May 02 12:28 PM Scooter-Pop wrote:
> MUCH Better yields in Preferred's!! Numerous are selling a Discount
> to their NAV and many pay monthly (Great DRIP opportunity).
Tom
Tom
On May 02 04:45 PM Smackdown wrote:
> I can't give any credibility to a supposed dividend investor who
> doesn't hold or consider MLPs. Why are there none in Dividend
> Tree's portfolio? Midstream fee based MLP stocks are some of
> the best performing investments for the last 10-15 years and are
> up as much as 40% YTD. Alerian MLP index is up 510% for 13 years.
> That is over 30% a year. Steady increasing dividends, fairly recession
> proof monopoly businesses, big tax deferrals, inflation protection
> due to FERC tariff CPI increases, etc etc. Please explain how
> you call yourself a dividend expert posting advice and no MLP picks?
Alot of people are shy to get into MLPs, because of the K-1 tax form, but I found this to not be such a big deal. And if you don't want to go about picking out individual MLPs, KMP/KMR is a good way to go. LINE and PWE are also favorites, though PWE is the more controversial of the two.
Also thanks to all the posters for the information on the Countrywide trust, this is the first time I have heard of them. I've also been eyeing some preferred ETF/CEF vehicles, but haven't really found them appealing, though it appears a few here are buying preferred shares straight out. My worry with that in the financial sector was the risk of converting preferred shares into common. I simply don't have enough information yet to make an informed decision, nor understand this area well enough, but probably some more astute investors here can navigate for some great returns.
On May 02 11:45 PM tswafford wrote:
> I liked your countrywide trust comment. A suitable MLP for IRA's
> is Kinder Morgan Partners (seekingalpha.com/symbo...) or
> KMP for non IRA's. It is down now but yields about 10%. I suspect
> a 10% yield will be hard to beat with a common stock portfolio given
> the current recession and the level of government debt.
>
> Tom
It also uses a 1099 tax form, so you don't have to worry about filling out a K-1.
I'd be interested to hear some other opinions on KYE.
Another idea for generating income on your dividend producing portfolio is to sell covered calls on your positions.
The K1's are just not that big a deal.
Or some closed end funds, such as IGD and ERH faithfully pay dividends monthly.
On May 04 05:57 PM Smackdown wrote:
> BAC common is trading over 50 cents higher a share than the BAC-PE
> preferred. That is an IMMEDIATE swap idea. Sell the at risk
> common with no dividend for a 10+% yielding inflation protected preferred,
> senior in the cap structure. And take dollars out. Please, anyone,
> explain what possible reason someone could have for keeping BAC over
> BAC-PE, in this environment (unless they are really gambling on some
> BS technical move)
On May 04 08:26 PM Lightway wrote:
> I've been reading lots of speculation about many preferred TARP bank
> shares having to stop payment on dividends, or being shotgun forced
> by the government to get conversions to common.
"My objective was to just get a utility stock in my portfolio, and hence this was a no brainer purchase. I bought it during the market boom when slow growers like utility stocks were out of favor. I had read a lot about utility stock being less volatile and a slow grower, well this was a real example for me.
STOCKS.
Not STOCK.
I complain because it is throughout your article.
THIS IS JUST AN EXAMPLE.
Please do not post things unless you compose in proper ENGLISH.
Thanks.
comment on author's post about investing (that's the purpose) and not the english. it does not change premise of the post? or does it ? go teach you english somewhere else, what a moron....