Rising Number of Renters Could Spell Trouble for Consumer Price Index 18 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
A MarketWatch story from yesterday notes an increase in apartment rents now that hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of "homeowners" are returning to their former status as renters.
Florida is a state hit hard by foreclosures, and now apartment rents there are on the rise, according to a new report released on Thursday.
...
There are several possible explanations, but Maya Brennan, research associate for the center, said that one seems particularly likely: "The number of foreclosures in Florida is pushing homeowners into the rental market."
Because demand has risen for apartments in the area, rents have gone up.
Rents seem to be on the rise in other parts of the country too. "Overall, it looks like rents have been on a slight increase," Brennan said.
This does not bode well for the inflation statistics since rental costs contribute almost one-third to the overall index. Earlier in the decade, modestly rising rental costs in combination with soaring home prices were the keys to our low-inflation, high-asset price prosperity.
Rising rental costs and falling home prices are not what the economists want these days.






















www.sacbee.com/busines...
seattlebubble.com/blog.../
www.recordnet.com/apps...
www.mydesert.com/artic...
www3.signonsandiego.co...
www.gazette.com/articl...
I am long EQR and UDR. I don't see rents rising in the near term. Too many job losses.
One is saving $2,000.00 a month from what his 2 bedroom apartment was costing him, and the other saves over $1,400.00 a month.
To me, it makes good sense for them to position themselves for what might just turn out to be the home buying opportunity of their lifetime. Prices have already dropped at least 40% from where they were at the market peak, and we anticipate them dropping at least another 30% from where they are today.
A house that sold for $600,000.00 in late 2006 is already on the market for an asking price of $295,000. One of my sons is waiting to buy it when it gets below $240,000.00. I've told him he should wait until the housing market starts to show signs of price recovery before buying, but he wants to take advantage of the artificially low financing rates now available.
I don't see apartment rents rising around here for at least the next three years. Too much vacant inventory and too much competition from vacant condo units owned by banks and S&L's who are trying to lease them out rather than sell them outright.
Foreclosures are getting multiple bids; but short sales are going wanting. We have offers in on 2 short sales, but the banks are dragging their feet making a decision. That's probably why few offers are made on short sales.
We've been looking for about nine months in a fixed price range. As time goes by, better and better homes come into our price range.
Larger complexes are offering great incentives (one month free for a 12-month lease, low deposits, etc.) because vacancies are still high for bigger complexes. Smaller complexes with fewer amenities have some pricing advantages, and that's where most of the rental increases are coming from.
Loss of construction jobs locally and high foreclosure rates have resulted in massive numbers of vacant homes, and by extension, vacant apartments. Many homes are renting for less than apartments with the same floor plans.
Meanwhile, home sales are up, but only because of distressed sales. Nearly 80% of closings this year have been on REO or short sale properties.
That points to even lower prices later in the year, with more homeowners underwater.
Think supply and demand.
Consider all the housing units that were built during the bubble that were purely speculative 'investments'. The owners never intended to live in them.
They come back on the market for sale or for rent but with no corresponding increase in the number of renters or potential homebuyers.
Rental rates are falling and they will continue to do so.
I would be more interested in the prices for renting SF homes, since that's what a foreclosed family would be looking for.
A couple of million Americans were paying "X" for "shelter" - i.e. to inhabit houses that they couldn't afford to pay "X" for every month.
Now those guys are paying "X" minus something to rent, so they are paying LESS for shelter.
OK that might be "inflationary" using the convoluted idiocy of "rental equivalence" that was used by the government to dress up the inflation figures so they could set the base-rate a lot less than the "real" rate of inflation, which was a major contributing factor behind the credit crunch.
But regardless of what the "official" CPI figures say, when people pay LESS for the same basic service (having a roof over their heads), that is NOT inflation.
Reality check might be appropriate at some point.
On May 08 09:11 AM herbert hoover wrote:
> Rents are falling and foreclosures are rising. The number of households
> is falling with children moving back to their parents and elderly
> moving back in with their children. We soon will see more three generation
> families living together than at anytime since the 1930s.