Seeking Alpha
About this author:
Submit
an article to

I knew this morning’s jobs report was going to be depressing — and with unemployment rising from 8.5% to 8.9% last month, I was right. But the unemployment rate among adult men is even worse. Here’s the relevant bit of the release:

unemployment.jpg

As you can see, as recently as February, adult men were no more likely to be unemployed than the population as a whole. In the past couple of months, however, a nasty gap has opened up, and it’s widening.

Yes, unemployment is a lagging indicator. But with adult-male unemployment rapidly approaching 10%, it’s also going to be a serious drag on the economy for the foreseeable future: households with unemployed men are not exactly engines of economic recovery.

Incidentally, the other unemployment measure worth keeping an eye on, U6, a broader measure of underemployment, hit 15.8% last month, up from 13.5% in December. So while the headline payrolls number might have fallen less than economists had expected, I can’t really see any green shoots here.

Print this article
Comments
45
You are viewing the first 20 comments View all »
  •  
    Felix,

    First, let me say I agree wholeheartedly with you. I am curious however, how you would respond to those that say that we've peaked with new unemployment claims and that historically economic recovery has followed close on the heels of this peak?
    2009 May 08 09:44 AM Reply
  •  
    Zero Hedge note a few minutes ago: Bureau of Census 60,000 temp workers + black box seasonal adjustment discount 65,000 + typical revision upward later 30,000 = total April nonfarm job losses 685,000
    zerohedge.blogspot.com...

    Employment lags recovery, not the other way around.
    2009 May 08 10:33 AM Reply
  •  
    I think unemployment will continue to grow, especially among men, until at least the 4Q when holiday employment and the effects of the stimulus begin to take hold. Still the unemployment rate is likely to reach 10% by then. I think the rate will still in double digits through mid-2010--and the economic recovery that follows will be slow and essentially jobless for a couple of years.

    Maybe more important, the high rate of unemployment has forced what I believe are secular changes in consuming habits. Households will be (as they have been for the last year) more conservative in their purchases even as the economy tries to recover. This will hold down both the recovery rate and keep the unemployment rate high.

    It's going to be awhile before we get out of this hole, healthy banks or no.
    2009 May 08 10:41 AM Reply
  •  
    I for one have gotten used to taking the government issued unemployment numbers with a grain of salt. My recollection is that every once in a while they get adjusted DOWN (less unemployment" but more often than not adjustments that are made tend to go UP.

    With everyone trying to talk up the market and afraid to sneeze since the "green shoots" might wither and die, forgive me for being cynical.
    2009 May 08 10:55 AM Reply
  •  
    How about this for manipulation?

    Government added 72,000 jobs, mostly temporary census jobs. State and local governments added 6,000 jobs, despite widespread accounts of layoffs


    Ridiculous that the government gets to use these numbers... ridiculous that they get to keep hiring. Does the government report them as job losses when the temporary worker gets laid off?
    So much manipulation. 72K in a month for census? Really?
    2009 May 08 11:01 AM Reply
  •  
    "The feeling is definitely there. It's a new morning in America. Fresh, vital...the old cynicism is gone. We have faith in our leaders. We're optimistic as to what becomes of it all. It really comes down to our ability to accept. We don't need pessimism. There are no limits. We must look to the strength of our nation."

    www.youtube.com/watch?...
    2009 May 08 11:04 AM Reply
  •  
    On May 08 11:04 AM SW Richmond wrote:
    > "The feeling is definitely there. It's a new morning in America.
    > Fresh, vital...the old cynicism is gone. We have faith in our leaders.
    > We're optimistic as to what becomes of it all. It really comes down
    > to our ability to accept. We don't need pessimism. There are no
    > limits. We must look to the strength of our nation."
    >
    > www.youtube.com/watch?...;feature=related

    Watch out for those green chutes. Soylent Green is people!
    2009 May 08 11:15 AM Reply
  •  
    I hate to bust your bubble........

    5/7/2009 11:20:00 PM

    Cummins to lay off 720

    By Boris Ladwig
    City Editor

    Cummins Inc. will lay off 720 south-central Indiana employees and halt production at Columbus MidRange Engine Plant for at least a month while Chrysler limps through bankruptcy.

    A Cummins spokesman said Cummins does not know when - or if - Chrysler will purchase more of the engines - though Cummins remains optimistic that the iconic Ram truck and the companies' long-lasting and profitable relationship will continue.

    The midrange plant is the exclusive supplier of 6.7-liter engines for the Dodge Ram pickup truck. Chrysler is idling the Ram plant in Saltillo, Mexico, while the company is being reorganized.


    On May 08 11:04 AM SW Richmond wrote:

    > "The feeling is definitely there. It's a new morning in America.
    > Fresh, vital...the old cynicism is gone. We have faith in our leaders.
    > We're optimistic as to what becomes of it all. It really comes down
    > to our ability to accept. We don't need pessimism. There are no
    > limits. We must look to the strength of our nation."
    >
    > www.youtube.com/watch?...;feature=related
    2009 May 08 11:16 AM Reply
  •  
    On May 08 10:33 AM Alan von Altendorf wrote:
    > Employment lags recovery, not the other way around.

    Question: Will this be the case during a balance sheet recession like the one we're in now? Certainly, during an "income statement" recession, employment has lagged recovery. With so much debt (corporate, household, governmental) to pay off, is this addage still appropriate? Households, for example, won't be able to pay off their debt if its adult members are unemployed.
    2009 May 08 11:25 AM Reply
  •  
    Unemployment is a double feedback mechanism. One persons unemployment helps sow the seeds of another persons job loss or wage decrease from increased supply in labor market. Not that consumption drives economic growth (production does) but removing that discretionary income doesn't help to solidify the existing labor structure, then couple that with the need for further destruction of capital through taxation directed at social safety nets. With the job losses mounting and further capital destruction, expect the jobless claims to get worse before they get better.
    2009 May 08 11:28 AM Reply
  •  
    Visit the link.


    On May 08 11:16 AM americafirst wrote:

    > I hate to bust your bubble........
    >
    > 5/7/2009 11:20:00 PM
    >
    > Cummins to lay off 720
    >
    > By Boris Ladwig
    > City Editor
    >
    > Cummins Inc. will lay off 720 south-central Indiana employees and
    > halt production at Columbus MidRange Engine Plant for at least a
    > month while Chrysler limps through bankruptcy.
    >
    > A Cummins spokesman said Cummins does not know when - or if - Chrysler
    > will purchase more of the engines - though Cummins remains optimistic
    > that the iconic Ram truck and the companies' long-lasting and profitable
    > relationship will continue.
    >
    > The midrange plant is the exclusive supplier of 6.7-liter engines
    > for the Dodge Ram pickup truck. Chrysler is idling the Ram plant
    > in Saltillo, Mexico, while the company is being reorganized.
    2009 May 08 11:49 AM Reply
  •  
    Women are overrepresented in the three tax-eating sectors of the economy: government bureaucracy, health care and education. Men are overrepresented in cyclical and risk-taking enterprises that get hit during recession. This is the downside of the "wage gap" for men—their jobs are less stable.
    2009 May 08 11:53 AM Reply
  •  
    10% unemployment by July.
    2009 May 08 11:54 AM Reply
  •  
    but wait! theres more!
    coming in May, the shutdowns of GM and Chrysler will be added to the unemployment total.

    and coming in June, the shutdowns of the auto part makers and dealerships, along with the transplant plants will be added to the list.

    and in July, we can add media companies and those who sell to the car companies employees!.

    and in August the sports organizations will add to the total!
    2009 May 08 11:55 AM Reply
  •  
    The government should reduce taxes for business and
    employers. The government should raise taxes by a like amount
    on any business sending jobs overseas and importing foreign workers. The carrot-and-stick approach should help to increase
    employment. This current government probably won't do this, of course; it is just too easy to print fresh dollars.
    2009 May 08 12:10 PM Reply
  •  
    Job losses will decline... to 400K, 300K, 200K sometime in the future, but the positive spin on this stuff is insane.
    The amount of job additions in productive non-government jobs to recover these is decades away
    2009 May 08 12:24 PM Reply
  •  
    Anyone who takes the BOGUS, monthly U.S. jobs reports seriously needs to re-enroll in school to learn simple arithmetic.

    How can the MONTHLY job-losses be much less than ONE WEEK of officially announced lay-offs (in the WEEKLY jobs report)?

    When the weekly lay-offs were only 300,000/week (last year), the U.S. economy was still suffering NET job losses over the course of a month. With weekly lay-offs more than DOUBLING, the monthly job-loss "statistic" from the BLS is not even remotely plausible.

    Ignore the propaganda and start to pay attention to the REAL data!!
    2009 May 08 12:29 PM Reply
  •  
    Who needs employment, so long as we have propped up bad banks with printed money! It is a government driven economy, and they pick the winners/losers on an ever changing basis, and they change whatever rules there are, as it suits them. No prudent entreprenuer would risk her/his money in this environment and expand employment.
    2009 May 08 12:30 PM Reply
  •  
    On May 08 11:25 AM Carlos Lam wrote:
    "Question: Will this be the case during a balance sheet recession like the one we're in now? Certainly, during an "income statement" recession, employment has lagged recovery. With so much debt (corporate, household, governmental) to pay off, is this addage still appropriate? Households, for example, won't be able to pay off their debt if its adult members are unemployed."

    The trajectory is inflation, higher taxes, more public spending, until private sector shrinks to 48% of GDP in 2015, which is an absolute ceiling of maximum sacrifice equal to WWII peak years 1943-44.

    The 1979 'Winter of Discontent' in Britain gave Margaret Thatcher an opportunity to privatize, using North Sea oil revenues to smooth over funding problems. America will never be an energy exporter, so that silver bullet solution doesn't exist.

    We're in a hell of a jam because of Social Security and Medicare, our 'world cop' spending, and unpayable debt (Federal + states + municipalities). Selling assets in not a good solution. We shipped whole factories to China, outsourced manufacturing to Mexico. Not much left to sell except financial services and consumer brands.

    The only way to put people in employment is to cut government in half, not double it. Put Citi, BofA, AIG and GSEs into receivership, instead of printing more debt (and outright lies). We need another Ross Perot.
    2009 May 08 12:45 PM Reply
  •  
    Good ole Cetin- Keep building bull markets on job losses, increasing consumer debt, inflationary money printing, endless government deficit spending...
    Great fundamentals...
    Market is surging though but a sustainable economic plan is not on the table.

    2009 May 08 12:51 PM Reply