How to Think About China Stocks 11 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Vitaliy Katsenelson has a skeptical piece on China’s economic “miracle” at MSN Money. As we pointed out earlier this month, skepticism has never been a strong suit of the Raging China Bulls and it’s refreshing to hear intelligent, contrarian voices like Vitaliy on the investment side or Derek Scissors for a broader economic/political view.
But there’s a fine line between intelligent skepticism and completely missing out on a gigantic investment opportunity for the sake of your beliefs. Like Vitaliy, I used to be a China skeptic. A couple years ago I published a scathing critique of the iShares China fund (ticker: FXI) at Forbes.com.
While I stand by my reasoning to this day, it was the wrong call. Period. And it was one of the worst I’ve ever made. After I had told the whole world that FXI was a dog, the fund rose in pretty much a straight line for more than a year. By October 2007 it had tripled. I was the laughing stock of the message boards. I suppose I was ultimately vindicated in some sense last fall, but that was only because, you know, the world almost came to an end. Other than that, it worked out just fine.
I’m still skeptical about parts of the China investment case, and I still think that FXI is a lousy way to invest in China even if you are bullish. But I also recognize that there are a lot of different ways to think about China as an investment theme and that dismissing the whole thing as “unsustainable” only guarantees that I’ll probably miss out on some great ideas. I like being a contrarian, but I like making money a lot more.
Bottom line: A lot of the things that you hear about China might be full of hype and hooey, but at the end of the day, China is the real deal. It’s up to you to figure out how it fits into your portfolio.
Related Articles
|

























This article has 11 comments:
In 2007, the story was exports. Last year, that crashed, but left some good opportunities in the consumer and finance sectors. Now, infrastructure is the big story. If you only know one ETF, you're missing most of the story.
China is a big and complicated place, and there's no more reason to lump it together and call it a good [or poor] investment than to think that, say, Europe is a good [or poor] investment, without regard to stock selection, timing, sector rotation, and all the other alpha-creation and risk-reduction techniques available.
You wrote: "A lot of the things that you hear about China might be full of hype and hooey..."
Indeed, a lot of the things you hear about any and every market are full of hype and hooey! That's the heart of the beast speaking.
Every up market is never going to stop going up; every down market is never going to stop going down. Both are a lot of hype and hooey.
This is why markets always overact, but it doesn't mean by any means we can't invest in them and make money—especially if we can discipline ourselves to ignore the hype and hooey, except to go against it when it gets to a fire point.
I've sold off some of my China investments this week, but I still own several.
Thank you for the info re LTON; will check it out more closely. AD
You can purchase many of these directly on the HK Exchange via E*Trade’s Global Trading Platform. The HK exchange price is mostly at a discount to the NYSE price if they are traded there, and usually less expensive than Shanghai too, if you have a way to buy on that exchange. I like HK exchange traded plays for lots of reasons.
Do your homework though. Because China is socialist, changes in government policy can have a bigger impact on your holdings than in more market economies.
Buying Chinese stocks today must be similar to what it was like for British investors to buy into the US growth story at its beginning 100 years ago. Deals like this don’t come around all that often.
You wrote: "I think Chinese large caps are the safest bet for the more conservative long term investor. These Chinese large caps are backed by the full faith and credit of the richest government in the world. And will most likely be so for the foreseeable future."
And:
"Buying Chinese stocks today must be similar to what it was like for British investors to buy into the US growth story at its beginning 100 years ago. Deals like this don’t come around all that often."
Well said. My views exactly.
Investing through HG into China is an opportunity of a lifetime.
Many American investors are leery because of years of propaganda against a Communist Regime that no longer acts like one.
Oligarchic, yes. But more nationalist than anything. Which means the government is statist, but also at this time pro-business.
Is America not statist? And can we say that America is still pro-business under the current leadership? I don’t think so.
It’s obvious that China wants its entire population of 1.1b people to take part in the economy and is working toward that end; that is an investing opportunity of more than a lifetime. Investors ought to take note of it.
I see one potential, but small worry: a regime change that would take the nation back toward complete state ownership—but my contact there says there’s nothing of the like on the horizon.
Both Jim Rogers and John Rutledge see things the same way, and they're no small-minded peons.
Long several Chinese stocks.