The Great Driving Reduction: Consumers Spend Less on Gas, With No New Legislation 7 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
According to data released yesterday from the Federal Highway Administration, travel on all roads and streets in the United States fell by -1.2% in March 2009 compared to March 2008. This marks the 17th consecutive month of traffic volume decline (starting in Nov. 2007) compared to the same month in the previous year. The moving 12-month total for traffic volume has fallen now for 16 consecutive months, going back to December 2007 (see chart above).
The 12-month moving total for March is the lowest traffic volume (2,914 billion miles) in any month since February 2004 (see red line on the chart above, click to enlarge).
WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama is asking consumers to put their money -- up to $1,300 per new vehicle by 2016 -- behind his plan for higher efficiency standards for cars and trucks and tougher rules on their greenhouse gas emissions.
In return, Obama said Tuesday in unveiling the plan, drivers would make up the higher cost of more fuel-efficient, cleaner vehicles by buying less gas at the pump. It would take just three years to pay off the investment and would, over the life of a vehicle, save about $2,800 through better gas mileage, the president said.
It seems like consumers have already decided on their own that voluntarily buying less gas at the pump can be in their own self-interest, and are now driving the same number of miles as they were five years ago, even with more cars and more drivers. Without stricter CAFE standards, consumers on their own have been driving less, have been buying less gas at the pump, and in the process have reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
Related Articles
|






















Ultimately, consumers have the real power in something as innocent as a rectangular plastic card called, the credit card. By choosing not to consume, it sends a much bigger and stronger warning than having to be forced by laws that never fully answer the underlying problem.
Great point.
The Electricnick.com team.
seekingalpha.com/artic...
You also said gas prices weren't too high; that "too high" would be $14-17 dollars. And that $3.56/gal gas was a bargain; I hope you hedged forward at that price.
seekingalpha.com/artic...
seekingalpha.com/artic...
No job, no commute, no mileage
Just the knowledge that The great Obama-mamma has interest in the subject has driven fuel spending to it's knees. May Allah be praised!.
In my opinion, that memory will be hard to erase and as a result, demand has permanently shifted.
The current demand is for jobs. THEN we'll worry about oil prices.