Seeking Alpha
We cover over 5K calls/quarter
Profile| Send Message| ()  

Executives

Lori C. Chaitman - Vice President of Investor Relations

Salvatore Iannuzzi - Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

James M. Langrock - Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President

Analysts

William G. Bird - Lazard Capital Markets LLC, Research Division

John Janedis - UBS Investment Bank, Research Division

Randle G. Reece - Avondale Partners, LLC, Research Division

Douglas M. Arthur - Evercore Partners Inc., Research Division

Glenn Greene - Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Research Division

Mark S. Marcon - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division

Monster Worldwide (MWW) Q1 2013 Earnings Call May 2, 2013 8:30 AM ET

Operator

Good morning. My name is Lindsay, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Monster Worldwide First Quarter 2013 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Lori Chaitman, Head of Investor Relations, you may begin your conference.

Lori C. Chaitman

Thank you. Good morning, and thank you for joining us on Monster Worldwide First Quarter 2013 Conference Call. We will have formal remarks from Sal Iannuzzi, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; and James Langrock, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In addition to Sal and James, members of our executive management team are available to answer your questions during the Q&A part of the call. They are Tim Yates, Ted Gilvar, Michael Miller, Lise Poulos and Mark Stoever.

Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that, except for historical information, the statements made during this conference call constitute forward-looking statements under applicable securities laws. Such forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties, including statements regarding the company's strategic direction, prospects and future results. Certain factors, including factors outside of our control, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements, including economic and other conditions in the markets in which we operate, risks associated with acquisitions or disposition, competition and the other risks discussed in our Form 10-K and our other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Sal for his comments. Sal?

Salvatore Iannuzzi

Thank you, Lori. Good morning, and welcome to Monster's First Quarter 2013 Conference Call. This morning, I'm going to summarize the current global economic environment, report on our financial results for the first quarter, update you on management priorities and comment on strategic review. In his comments, James will provide additional financial detail and our EPS outlook for the second quarter.

The uncertain global economic environment, which we were anticipating when we initiated our restructuring 2 quarters ago is continuing and is having a negative impact on customer demand. The actions we took in our restructuring are successfully protecting our profitability and cash flow during the period of weakness.

Summarizing the quarter's results, EPS was $0.08. EBITDA was $38 million. Revenue of $212 million was flat on a sequential basis and down 9% year-over-year basis. We are encouraged by the fact that revenue in the United States is up on a sequential basis. Because of the nature of our business and for competitive reasons, we have decided not to disclose bookings going forward.

Revenue in North America was down 3% on a year-over-year basis and up 4% sequentially. The economic and political environment in the U.S. remains mixed, largely driven by the cost covenants of sequestration, political gridlock and slower-than-normal recovery in the employment market, resulting in our -- in many companies in our industry reporting decelerating top line trend. In this environment, recruits have lots of time to fill relatively few job, while Monster's holding its own, the solutions and efficiencies we provide to clients allow us to be even more competitive in an expanding, recruiting environments.

Our key Asian markets are Korea and India. While both markets remain highly profitable, they have not yet returned to growth patterns we enjoyed up until a year ago. No doubt the environment in Korea is impacted by a reduction in global trade and the current political uncertainty. In India, a number of recent earnings release have reflect the sluggishness that we all see. Revenue in Asia-Pac was down 10% on a year-over-year basis and down 6% sequentially.

Europe continues to be our weakest region caused by the continuing crisis in Europe. It is becoming increasingly evident that even the strongest European economies are struggling. Our European revenue was down 20% versus last year and down 4% sequentially.

Having effectively completed the restructuring, exited China, Brazil, Mexico, Turkey, our short-term priority is to focus on our core markets and grow profitable market share. We are well positioned to do so because in each of our core markets, we enjoy a #1 or #2 market position. In the coming months, we will continue to lead in delivering quality candidate to our customers. Improvements in CRM, CEO -- I'm sorry, SEO -- I apologize -- and greater distribution of job content will continue to provide significant improvement in our client yield, while reducing costs per applied.

We will continue to focus on adoption of our new products, 10, PRS and SeeMore. SeeMore has recently been launched in France and the Netherlands, and the backlog for this product continues to increase. We will broaden the market for our customized software solution. Execution of these management priorities will position us well for the important fourth quarter renewal season and eventual improvement in the overall employment market.

I'd now like to comment on a review of strategic alternatives. As you know, the review was designed to consider a number of internal options as well as the potential sale of the company in order to enhance shareholder value. Coming out of that issue, we have taken decisive action to restructure the company and exit unprofitable markets, including the sale of China. These actions, which have largely been completed will result in substantial increase in our core profitability.

The strategic review also included a comprehensive analysis of our current and future recruitment marketplace and our competitive position in that space. We have identified a number of new initiatives, which we believe will further significantly enhance our value proposition to clients and will create substantial opportunity for Monster. You may expect to see this being introduced in the months ahead.

Compensations with regard to the potential sale of the company are continuing, but there is no certainty that they will result in a transaction. We expect that these conversations will be completed in the near future. While these conversations are ramping up, we are aggressively pursuing our strategy.

Our management and the board are extremely confident in the Monster franchise and its ability to generate significant cash flow. As a result, the board has authorized a $200 million buyback to be executed over a period of 24 months. The program announced today replaces the $250 million buyback program that expired on April 25, 2013.

While we were unable to fully execute on the previous buyback due to the ongoing review of strategic alternatives, we believe repurchasing shares at current level represents a very attractive investment. The company will repurchase shares under the new authorization opportunistically and as appropriate.

I'd now like to turn the call over to James for his comments.

James M. Langrock

Thank you, Sal, and good morning. Slide 1 summarizes the first quarter 2013 pro forma income statement from continuing operations. As a reminder, these results exclude ChinaHR, Latin America and Turkey in all periods.

EPS was $0.08 a share. EBITDA was $38 million. As Sal noted in his comments, revenue was $212 million, flat on a sequential basis and a decline of 9% year-over-year. Operating expense of $197 million was an 8% decrease compared to the prior year and flat sequentially. Currency had a minimal impact on operating income during the quarter. Interest and other was negative $1.3 million. Equity loss was $500,000.

Slide 2 summarizes the quarter's pro forma adjustments and the results of discontinued operations. During the quarter, there were $1.4 million related to the review of strategic alternatives, $13 million related to the corporate restructuring. These 2 charges were offset by a $17 million tax benefit, which includes the reversal of a previous recorded tax liability. Finally, there's a $6 million loss from discontinued operations. The majority of the costs associated with the corporate restructuring and our discontinued operations have been incurred.

Slide 3 shows operating expense trends. Salary related was $98 million, essentially flat on a sequential basis and a 13% reduction on a year-over-year basis. Please recall that there's a normal sequential uptick in salary-related expense in Q1 related to FICA taxes.

Marketing expense was $49 million, an increase of 11% on a sequential basis. This increase reflects the incremental marketing in select European countries to drive incremental job seekers to our sites. Office and general expense was $50 million, an 8% sequential decrease. The decrease is a result of the corporate restructuring. Headcount of 3,852 is over 500 less heads than last year at this time.

Slide 4 reviews non-GAAP segment performance. Revenue in North America and Korea's business was up 4% sequentially and down 3% year-over-year. EBITDA was $31 million, and EBITDA margin was 27%. From a revenue perspective, our government segment was up approximately $2.8 million or 30%, reflecting the increasing flow-through from deferred revenue. Our government business has seen substantial growth over the past several years, and as we are successfully implementing the projects, revenue is increasing accordingly.

E-commerce staffing revenue are both up in low single digits. Please keep in mind that activity from our e-Comm channel flows directly through the revenue and is often an early indicator of future activity. Revenue from the enterprise channel was down 8%.

Revenue in international career segment was down 18% on a year-over-year basis and 4% sequentially. Despite the significant reduction in top line resulting from the Euro crisis, the segment continues to be profitable on an EBITDA basis with $4 million of EBITDA. We anticipate significant EBITDA rebound when the European economies recover. Europe was down 20% year-over-year and 4% sequentially. Almost all countries were down in the neighborhood of 20%. As you know, Monster has successful local businesses in each of our major European markets, and we faced different competition in each of these markets. The fact that each country is performing similarly in the face of competition confirms our belief that the primary driver of top line weakness is in overall European economy.

APAC revenue was down 10% year-over-year and 6% sequentially. Revenue from both Korea and India were down around 10% on a year-over-year basis. Revenue from our IAF segment was flat sequentially and down 5% year-over-year. EBITDA was $8 million.

Slide 5 is key balance sheet and cash flow items. Pro forma EBITDA was $38 million, GAAP to EBITDA was $25 million. Net cash use for operations was $8.6 million. Included in this amount was approximately $35 million of one-time cash costs associated with the corporate restructuring and discontinued operations.

Looking forward, there will be substantially lower amount of cost associated with the restructuring, and we anticipate healthy free cash flow. Capital expenditures were $9 million, which we feel is sustainable level over the near-term.

Deferred revenue was $356 million, slightly up on a sequential basis. In addition to deferred revenue, we have $150 million of multi-year firm contractual deals, which had not yet been included in deferred revenue. Total liquidity was $266 million. We are currently estimating our EPS in Q2 will be in the range of $0.06 to $0.10 per share.

Now I'd like to turn the call back to Sal for his concluding remarks.

Salvatore Iannuzzi

Thanks, James. We are fully committed to and enthusiastic about the potential for this company. We're rebuilding the company and diversified away from reliance on traditional job board model. We have introduced award-winning new products. Clients around the world are reacting positively from new offering.

Monster today is much leaner. We have the financial and managerial strength to weather this period of uncertainty and to fully execute on our strategy. We remain confident that revenue and profitability will increase significantly with a firmer business environment.

Operator, please open up the call for any questions.

Question-and-Answer Session

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of William Bird with Lazard.

William G. Bird - Lazard Capital Markets LLC, Research Division

Sal, I was wondering if you could share with us just how one should interpret the large buyback plan in the context of the strategic review process. Are you in a set going into motion on privatizing the company?

Salvatore Iannuzzi

I think that it's simply a situation where -- first of all, conversations are still going on. We have no -- there's no -- it's difficult to predict. It's not impossible at this point to say whether those conversations will result in a transaction that we feel comfortable with for our shareholders. In light of that, we want to be prepared. We think that the stock at current prices is an extremely good investment for our shareholders. And therefore, we want to be ready and enable to do a substantial buyback when it becomes appropriate.

William G. Bird - Lazard Capital Markets LLC, Research Division

And just as a follow-on, maybe you can just kind of share with us your view on not disclosing bookings. Some may view this decision skeptically. What are some of the factors that led to the decision?

Salvatore Iannuzzi

Sure. We -- obviously, we consider the skeptics out there in making the decision, but we thought that this was the right thing to do for our business. I think 2 things. Number one, our business has evolved where we have more transactions, the longer term in nature, and therefore the booking number was less predictive of future revenue than it had been several years back.

The business has changed, possibly because of the product mix we've introduced so it became less and less relevant. So the other issue, which is also quite significant is that announcing and giving that information, we found was putting us in an -- increasingly disadvantaging us vis-à-vis the competition and causing some behavior particularly towards the end of the quarter that was potentially damaging to us, so we decided to stop it.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of John Janedis with UBS.

John Janedis - UBS Investment Bank, Research Division

Sal, when I think about the industry and your business through a cycle, I assume that it still has a growth trajectory to it? And I know there are lot of inputs around that, but without asking for guidance, can you talk about maybe the macro environment and product mix that positions you for growth?

Salvatore Iannuzzi

Sure. I think that, first of all, without question, we feel that in the right environment -- you have to remember, Monster's products, the whole genesis of Monster's is really set heavily on economic times when recruitment is in demand. Right now, in many sectors, it is not. There are some bright spots, for example, in oil exploration, energy, construction, et cetera. But on the whole, demand is light, and in some cases, for example, the Europe is definitely contracting and contracting heavily at this point. And that's not a new event. That's been going on for several quarters now. We definitely see the potential for the company as growth. We see the products that we are introducing, both being productive in lean times and very productive in times of expensive growth in recruitment. So that's how we've been positioning the company. I think out of the process of reassessing our entire business. We've identified a number of -- a new opportunity that we'll be introducing in the -- as I said, in my comment, in the months ahead. So we'll be challenging the market once again.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Randle Reece with Avondale Partners.

Randle G. Reece - Avondale Partners, LLC, Research Division

If you look at the balance sheet or the cash flow statements that is -- there's a decrease in deferred revenue in the first quarter, and historically, that's unusual. I was wondering if you could explain a little what's going on there.

James M. Langrock

So the deferred revenue on a sequential basis increased, Randy, so it's just -- the bookings go in, so it's a matter of -- we look at them on a sequential basis that deferred revenue was up by $4 million or $5 million sequentially. It's just a function of revenue and the top line.

Randle G. Reece - Avondale Partners, LLC, Research Division

Still, even on the balance sheet, the change in deferred revenue as well, it's simply modest versus history.

James M. Langrock

Randy, all you got to take out -- you got to also look -- you got to take out the China. I'm not sure if you -- might be better to take this off-line, Randy, but you probably -- in the prior year, you're probably still looking at China in there as well that I think China and developing markets and Turkey out as well.

Randle G. Reece - Avondale Partners, LLC, Research Division

I wasn't trying to compare year-over-year. I was just looking at sequential changes.

James M. Langrock

Sequential, yes, I'll go off-line with you on that, Randy.

Randle G. Reece - Avondale Partners, LLC, Research Division

Just in terms of the -- if I just look at the occupational mix of job posts on your website in North America. It seems like you've developed some holes in certain occupations, especially professional. And I'm wondering if you're just going to see those, the competition there, if you're going to do something and try to regain share in occupations where you've kind of slipped?

Salvatore Iannuzzi

Randy, this is Sal. I think that when we look, and it's something that we do monitor frequently, very frequently. I think that our mix of jobs -- first, the mix is -- does change from time to time but, overall, right now, we don't see a significant shift in one area versus another from historic levels. Well, I think the mix of job, what you're maybe seeing is different points in time. Certain customers have sizable demand, and when they put those posting on the site, they may look like their dominating the site, but if you look deeper into it, I think what you will see and what we see is a relatively balanced portfolio, if you will, of jobs and opportunities with very little fluctuation from traditional levels. In fact we have more jobs on the site today than before.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Doug Arthur with Evercore.

Douglas M. Arthur - Evercore Partners Inc., Research Division

Yes, so just going back to the timing and intensity of the buyback. To the extent that you are still in some discussions with third parties about the sale or investment or what have you with the company, can you, in fact , while that is going on, jump in with the buyback as rigorously -- as vigorously as you want? Or does one have to end before there's some start in earnings? So I'm just trying to understand the sensitivities there on timing?

Salvatore Iannuzzi

Sure. As you know, about almost 2 years ago, we announced a buyback of $250 million. We executed on about $110 million of that approximately. We weren't able to execute on hold, but simply because of conversations that were going on. And more recently, we also felt that given the restructuring that we were embarking on and the need for cash for that, that we would hold back until we saw that through. The restructuring -- the cost of the restructuring is mostly behind us. There's very low left to be done. So we don't have that obstacle any longer. I think that there are conversations right at this moment that on the buyback would be deemed inappropriate to execute on. However, we wanted to be ready and as those conversations end, and we deem it appropriate of course, with the consultation of council that we will execute. And we want it to be ready to execute very aggressively, particularly, given these prices.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Glenn Greene with Oppenheimer.

Glenn Greene - Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Research Division

I guess, first question -- I know you don't want to give the specifics on the bookings, but I think it would be helpful sort of if you get some maybe directional comment, strengths, weaknesses, color by region. Just give us a little bit more on feel of kind of what you're seeing out there, without giving any disclosures that your competition might be able to take advantage of. I think it's important for investors to kind of understand what you're seeing in their business. The follow-up would be on the buyback just wanted to understand when you're in the market to do the buyback, how aggressive you might be and kind of in the context of balancing the cash flexibility?

Salvatore Iannuzzi

I think, first -- on the first question, Okay. I think it's -- to some degree it was said in the comments, United States in the U.S. business is not robust. It is sluggish. While we have some bright spots, and we see -- to give you some color, we see some bright spots, for example, in e-Comm, particularly, in certain regions of the country. It's a very mixed picture, because normally, in the past, when we see an income grow and that's been a precursor to a general increase in business, meaning they also increased in improvement in the economy. What we are seeing now is some improvement, but it's by region, not across the board. So you may have 1 region of the country that's actually slower than it had been. And you have another region, which is increasing quite nicely. I think that's due to the degree there is recovery going on, it is selective. And with the selective industries, and if those industries are in a certain geographic area, that geographic area is benefiting. In -- on a more macro scale in the U.S., business, as I said, we seem to have a wave that builds a positive move. And then things like sequestration and all the noise around that, sort of push it back down in companies, which we may be in negotiations with certain contracts -- will -- who were more interested in spending more, and recruiting will pull back because there's more uncertainty that's been brought into the equation. So you see some of that. But on the whole, as we mentioned earlier, United States is holding its own, and we're very happy to finally see that on a sequential basis, our revenue was improving slightly here in the United States. In Asia, our 2 principal markets, again, Korea and India. I think Korea is more than holding on without question dominant in that market, but it's an export-centric economy and exports are slow. Europe is not buying, and the demand here in the United States is modest. In India, I think you have the influx of American investment. And European investments into India is slow, because -- for same reason. And therefore the business, while not declining is not increasing. It's sort of holding its own, I'll call that as flattish. There is no -- as in Korea, there is no fundamental change in what's going on. It's just the demand isn't there. And for other companies in the industry see exactly the same things in those countries. In Europe is where the biggest problem lies. And that we tend to see it earlier, because demands for hiring starts to add, and then it starts to really affect companies and company performance. I'm sure you've seen many companies in Europe were reported for the first quarter have shown very significant decline even in the slowest economy in Europe and Germany. Take one sector, the automobile, many of the major German automobile companies have shown very sizable declines in demand in Germany itself, let alone the rest of Europe for German products. And so we're seeing business in Europe, and it's across the board. It's down around 20% plus or minus. I think that the -- it is not -- one of the things that is both difficult to deal with in the sense of, you don't want to see business drop by that amount, but at the same time, our competitive in each of those countries are different, we have different competitors, some with slightly different model than ours and slightly different models from each other and -- but every country's behaving exactly the same, which leads us to conclude the issue is the economy is the biggest part of the issue. And when resolution is reached then, of course, none of us have a crystal ball to wind up my faith. But when progress is made, we will see a recovery in demand. But right now, it's a difficult period to navigate with.

Glenn Greene - Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Research Division

And the share repurchase appetite, given the cash flexibility?

Salvatore Iannuzzi

We think that given the cash we have available, the positive cash flow the company has put aside this quarter, because we use a lot of cash to finance the restructuring, that we are very comfortable in being able to execute on -- aggressively on the buyback. Again, our biggest issue there is not the availability of the cash to do so. We have that capability. Our issue is really from an appropriateness standpoint. When should we -- when can we do it without giving other conversation of things that are going on.

Operator

Our last question comes from Mark Marcon of R.W. Baird.

Mark S. Marcon - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division

Can you talk a little bit about what -- it doesn't sound like the environment's going to change anytime soon. So when we think about the restructuring that you put in place, how much of a reduction in quarterly expenses should we end up seeing?

James M. Langrock

So, Mark, and as I said in my prepared remarks, in Q1, you had the impact of FICA expense, so you'll get that benefit.

Mark S. Marcon - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division

How much was that?

James M. Langrock

You got -- it's couple million dollars and then it's a Q2. Also, we had restructuring actions we've taken in some of the actions we've taken in Q1 so you'll start to get the full benefit. We're going backwards in Q2. And what we said is, on an annualized basis, it would be about $50 million. You won't get all that $50 million this year but on an annualized basis, you will get that so...

Mark S. Marcon - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division

But how much should we see in Q2?

James M. Langrock

There will be -- I'm not going to give you an exact number, but we'll be down sequentially with FICA and then the restructuring as well.

Mark S. Marcon - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division

Is there still restructuring that has to be done?

James M. Langrock

The majority of it's behind us.

Mark S. Marcon - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division

Is there a reason why we shouldn't see a quarterly benefit of $12.5 million to kind of get us to that $50-ish million annualized run rate?

James M. Langrock

The thing you got to be careful with is that also, we did this stuff in Q4, Mark, so you probably -- you should really look at, from a run rate perspective, you got to look at Q2, Q3 of 2012, because we did start the restructuring in Q4. So you got to look -- take a look at the Q3, Q4 OpEx, excluding the discontinued operations, and then you'll start seeing the full benefit in Q2, Q3 of '13.

Salvatore Iannuzzi

And, Mark, I also want to make sure it's understood that there are -- we still have a very sizable business, and there are opportunities out there, which we may choose to go after from time to time. So you could see expenses fluctuate, they're not huge numbers but $1 million or $2 million from quarter-to-quarter just us pursuing opportunities. For -- and I don't want to give some color on this. And maybe that we see an opportunity, and we may add some salespeople, because we can increase revenue and particularly in a certain geographic area or with regards to a certain product. On the other hand, we are making strong, very, very deep stride in attracting and increasing our replies through increased SEO, CRM and other methodologies, which may allow us to increase the yield to our customers, and at the same time not spending quite as much money to bring those leads to them because of other improvements and strides that we're making. We're very focused on that area right now, because we consider it an opportunity. Again, both to increase the yields rather dramatically to our customers, at the same time, as perhaps benefit our marketing expense loss. So depending when those things occur, you will see some fluctuation, but on a macro basis, which we're saying is largely correct.

Mark S. Marcon - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division

And how much flexibility sell would you have in terms of adjusting the international cost structure on a go forward basis, because it sounds, in particular, Europe is going to be choppy through the second quarter. So can you make some more adjustments there? Or is -- are the labor regulations such that it would be difficult?

Salvatore Iannuzzi

No, I -- look, I think that we've shown that we're pretty good at managing the cost side. I think that -- and what you suggest, the issue raised is obviously, consideration in Europe in terms of -- particularly, when it comes to people, so there may be a longer tale because of the process and what has to occur. If indeed, if the situation was to deteriorate significantly more, I think we've built in enough buffer, where we are today. But if the situation were to deteriorate significantly more, I think we still have option to react to protect the bottom line. And it's not only with regard to people. It's another area -- another cost area of the business, largely, in Europe and outside of Europe.

Mark S. Marcon - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division

Great. And then one strategic question. With regards to -- when you first made the announcement in terms of looking at strategic alternatives, which obviously, you went through some thought process and evaluation prior to making that announcement, since the time that you originally conceived that making announcement, the industry has evolved dramatically. There've been lots of changes. Does that open up some potential strategic alternatives that previously may have been considered difficult from a regulatory perspective that now, because of the changes in the environment, might actually be quite possible?

Salvatore Iannuzzi

That's the beauty of the business Monster's in. So the old adage of the weather in the U.K., if you wait a half hour, it'll be sure to change. Our industry, our market is evolving, continues to evolve very, very fast. It presents all sorts of opportunities, both with regard to be direct, in terms of alternatives, of who may be interested in Monster? Also, a lot of alternatives in terms of the direction to take the business and to exploit new situations and new opportunity. So we're monitoring -- and not only monitoring but acting on those that are the most promising that we think there is opportunity, and with regard to precisely to the selling of the company. We have been pursuing those opportunities where we see them -- and our advisors see them and to investigate. It's part of the original reason we did this. We said we were going to -- our #1 obligation is to increase shareholder value. We'd be remiss in trying to do that if we didn't consider the evolving market and new places of new opportunities with which to try and do that. So the answer to your question is yes, we are doing that, we are considering those things, we see them. And I'm positive that they'll continue to evolve.

Operator

This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.

Salvatore Iannuzzi

Thank you very much, everyone.

Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited.

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS.

If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com. Thank you!

Source: Monster Worldwide Management Discusses Q1 2013 Results - Earnings Call Transcript
This Transcript
All Transcripts