Seeking Alpha
About this author:

With the Federal Reserve indeed following through last week on the lobbyists' months-long push to include legacy commercial real estate debt into their TALF program[Feb 23, 2009: Fed May Need to Recast TALF on Commercial Real Estate] [Jan 13, 2009: Bailout Nation Continues in Commercial Real Estate Land - "Lemme In on that Money"] [Dec 22, 2008: Wall Street Journal - Property Developers Ask for Government Bailouts], the REITs are very happy campers. It took 6 long months, but the central bank finally broke. You just have to love a country where lobbyists have access to the Fed, but the people cannot even audit it. Cronyism 101.

I didn't bother posting it because we've been telegraphing this move for many months, and as I wrote the blog entry, that little piece of throw up starting shooting up my throat... remember the end game folks - the Federal Reserve is now a massive hedge fund and when your attention is elsewhere in 2011-2013 (enjoying a new bubble they create with easy money) they will suffer large losses from everything they are backstopping. Notice the "truth in labeling" - 'toxic' has been replaced with 'legacy'... but trust me, it all smells the same.

  • May 19 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Reserve on Tuesday further widened its safety net for downtrodden credit markets by making older commercial property loans eligible for an emergency program.
  • The move is the Fed's first attempt to use its unlimited lending capacity to try to support markets for "legacy securities," or those that were created months or years ago. Previously, the Fed program supported only new commercial real estate lending.
  • If the Fed's efforts to start up commercial real estate lending works, it could begin to help an industry that many analysts believe is on the verge of massive losses. (because that's what the Fed is here to do, help very well off people not take losses - right there in their charter)
  • Risk premiums on commercial mortgage-backed securities dropped after the announcement, according to Trepp, a bond data provider that tracks commercial mortgage backed securities. (everything is safe guys! We unloaded even more junk onto the US taxpayer! hip hip hooray!)


Right now shorting REITs is betting against the US taxpayers' money, so it is difficult... even if vacancies increase and rents drop, Uncle Ben will use your money to protect the power players. I am closing SL Green (SLG) here as a short position. I tried one last time to short after the news last week about the legacy asset inclusion, but after a short swoon (sell the news) we are already back to a happy place.

I'm still adjusting to a central command economy, but I'm starting to get the hang of it now - don't short industries that have the biggest lobbyist arms... and within those industries especially avoid the "too biggest to fail" firms. And please don't forget who this is really helping... you know whose balance sheets a plethora of commerical real estate loans are sitting on? Yep... you guessed it. American financial oligarchs laugh again.

I still have a few small positions in 3 remaining REITs, but most likely they will be going as well.

This is not the type of chart I short, in fact its one to get long.... Bernanke stands behind you (with your own money) Another win/win/win for all involved (as long as none of those 3 are a taxpayer). But remember as long as the stock market goes up, everything must be right in the world... especially as we take all risk from those who play in the stock market, and put it on the shoulders of the peasants; many of which have little to no exposure in the stock market. Just assure them everything is ok, these are all good steps and Main Street = Wall Street. If they complain - point to the stock market; I mean the "market always knows" - just ask Alan Greenspan. Working like a charm so far, confidence is up per this morning's survey.

Whatever the era, this magical snake oil still works - year 1400s peasants are really no different from year 2000s peasants.

No position

Print this article with comments

This article has 5 comments:

  •  
    Does this really help the REITs?
    It may help banks and funds invested in CMBS but if the banks don't turn around and issues loans to REITs how does it help?
    We've seen Banks helping REITs underwrite secondary stock offerings so the REITs can pay back loans to the Banks.
    If banks were willing to issue loans to REITS, these dilutive offerings would not be necessary.
    So I am thinking that short and medium term this will actually not be much of a positive for REITs.
    This is more positive for Banks and one more step to help them clear their balance sheets by offloading assets onto the taxpayer that no one wants.
    May 26 11:19 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    So we made building houses that people couldn't afford a government sponsored activity.

    Now we make keeping CRE afloat that businesses don't want a government activity.

    Funny that you would think the first one would be a Democratic thing, and the second a Republican one. However in a "down is really up" world, I suppose it makes sense.
    May 27 09:37 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The seeking alpha article on SLG is pretty much trash.

    The writer forgets that the "enhanced" job of the fed is assuring financial market functioning in a worldwide financial meltdown. Intelligent payback can and will occur later.

    As for the SLG short position, closing it is a good idea in this post -financiaalmeltdown $50 +bv/share issue.

    JMO. specsit.
    May 27 09:54 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Dont miss the point the problem is in the oversupply in housing, the sooner those excess invetories are sold off the better for the worldwide economy, the rest is irrelevant.
    May 27 10:16 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I sold SL Green at a nice profit when the dividend was lowered to .10,
    and because there are too many shorts in the REIT. It wasn't worth the risk to me to hold it for such a little dividend and have to worry about the shorts eroding the value besides.

    What happened to the reinstatement of the uptick rule?
    Jun 19 07:50 AM | Link | Reply