Benefit from Ultra ETFs' Tracking Error 7 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Ultra ETFs have become very popular, but can destroy your portfolio if you are not careful. Most of these seek to ‘double’ the daily movement of the underlying security or sector. The important word in this description is ‘daily’ not ‘double’; these are not long-term investment vehicles! It seems like this should not present a problem, but simple math will explain how “tracking error” will erode your equity in a choppy market.
The figures below explain:
Use your calculator to divide 100 by 1.1=90.91
Multiply 90.91 x 1.05= 95.46
Divide 95.46 by 1.07=89.21
Multiply 89.21 x 1.12=99.92
Now do the same exercise, but double the amount of daily movement.
Your answer is 99.69.
In four market fluctuations of less than 20%, an investment in an Ultra ETF just lost .23% in ‘tracking error’. This little test explains why I like to ‘short’ Ultra ETFs.
In spite of the market movements, Ultra ETFs always get worth less. The wilder the market, the more the erosion, or ‘tracking error’. Imagine the thousands of transactions that occur in one day, the multiple fluctuations in price that are inherent in just one day. Now multiply that over many days or months.
These are NOT long-term investments. These are trading vehicles. If you are going long with any Ultra ETF, it should be held only for the short term, and hopefully while it is moving in one direction.
Even for a short-term position, why not short an Ultra ETF to take advantage of the ‘tracking error’? Take any advantage available, For example, to trade on the rise of the S&P500 you could buy the SSO Ultra ETF; this ETF seeks to double the daily movement of the S&P500. To take advantage of the tracking error, short the SH (Ultra Short S&P500). This Ultra ETF seeks to double the daily movement of the S&P500 inversely. As the 500 goes up, SH goes down twice as fast. You short sale it and buy back at later for less. The ‘tracking error’ will give you a little extra profit.
ETFs are great trading vehicles, but more importantly, some of the ETFs are great investment vehicles with a low average 0.08% expense fees. The alternative many investors use are mutual funds, these investment vehicles carry an average management fee of 2.2% A mutual fund cost 27 times the expense ratio of the average ETF. Is the cost worth the benefit? Can you manage your investments, cut costs, and improve your return? I believe you can, if you are cautious and always keep two rules in mind:
Related Articles
|






















On Jun 02 07:44 PM Baboon wrote:
> Shorting SH as well as SDS for the long-term is a dangerous game.
> One can lose all his capital if SPY doubles in value.