Seeking Alpha
About this author: By this author:

As WTI Crude oil for July delivery passed $65 a barrel last week there was talk that high oil prices could derail the recovery. We share this view with one qualifier; oil prices above $50 take significant political risk off the table.

Most of the Gulf States have based their previous budgets on oil above $50 a barrel. When oil dipped below this level, many countries, including Iran were forced to cut expenditures. The fastest way to derail economic recovery would be to have political and social unrest in Iran.

Our neighbor to the south, Mexico, has also been labeled a dangerous state with the potential for rapid collapse. The Mexican government has been fighting a losing battle with drug cartels. The government relies on oil sales to fund over 30% of the budget. In what was probably the greatest trade by a country in 2008, Mexico hedged its oil output at $70 a barrel through Goldman Sachs (GS). This allowed the government to continue to fund the war against the drug dealers. As oil approaches that level again, we would advise President Calderon to pay a visit to his friendly bankers at Goldman Sachs. And since the US government is so keen on intervention, we should encourage this meeting in the name of national security. Despite the light sarcasm of our suggestion, social unrest is a serious threat and is a direct result of not enough money.

Additionally, oil at the higher end of the range ($75) makes exploration and alternative energy a profitable venture. Certainly, higher gas prices will crimp consumer spending and is why we see oil above $75 a barrel as detrimental to the economic recovery. There is a delicate balance between stability and recovery.

Disclosure: I am long UGA.

Print this article with comments

This article has 17 comments:

  •  
    Agreed.

    At this range of crude oil, best strategy is to long XLE and XLY with covered call strategy. XLE has not caught up to new range for crude oil; XLY is panicked about $3+ gas price.

    As long as crude stays in the $50 to $75 ($65 even better), US economy can grow (it'll take a while though), and equities can find a firm support after a period of consolidation (maybe starting today).
    Jun 03 12:30 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Why anyone would believe that crude is going to stabilize is beyond me. The markets have awakened to the fact that crude is finite and depleting rapidly. There is no way to switch to alternatives in the time frame necessary to prevent crude from exploding upward once again.
    Add to that, an administration that is opposed to developing oil and nat gas in the interim. Volatility is and will continue to be staggering with higher highs and higher lows.

    Inflation will support the trend upward. We have buried our economy with unbelievable spending that may or may not be recoverable.
    Jun 03 01:43 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    It would be a good thing because it will still be a lot cheaper than where it is heading.
    Jun 03 01:49 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The EIA publishes its weekly stock numbers on oil and other petroleum products each Wednesday. www.eia.doe.gov/oil_ga...

    or you can look at the raw numbers here:

    tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/...
    (Click on the Data 1 tag)

    This week analysts thought stocks would drop by some 2 million barrels. Instead they increased by 2.866 million.

    May 29, 2009 365.977 million bbls
    May 22, 2009 363.111

    That’s a 5 million bbls error which is huge. But it doesn’t begin to capture just how insane the oil market really is. This is the crude oil stock number from last year at this time.

    May 30, 2008 306.757 million

    We are currently carrying 59.22 million bbl more this year than last year. This is in large part due to the fact that the economy is doing so much worse this year. But that is rather the point. Supply is through the roof. The economy sucks, and the near oil crude future has doubled from its low of $30.28 which it hit on December 23, 2008 at the bottom of its collapse from the previous speculative binge, --or if you prefer the 2009 low, $34.03 on February 12, 2009.

    tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav...

    What this screams is manipulation. It is a subsidy for oil producers, a windfall for investment banks, and a hidden tax on already cash strapped American consumers.
    Jun 03 03:56 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The price of oil is poised for a huge long term ramp up.

    While North America and Europe are trying to use oil wisely, the concept is not universal.

    Not only is Mexico's production falling off a cliff, the same is happening in the Middle East. (read Matthew Simmons "Twilight in the Desert" for details). The sheiks dare not disclose this fact or else civil unrest would surely unsue. In the Middle East, gasoline is highly subsized and consequently everyone drives gas guzzlers. Furthermore, the huge population explosion taking place in the region requires lots of electricity generated from buring oil (the USA gave up this wasteful practice over 30 years ago). Also, water has dried up in the aquifiers and is produced by desalinating plants using large qunatities of natural gas. No wonder when Bush 43 asked his buddies in Saudi Arabia to ramp up oil production, the answer was a "No", very surprising given that oil was selling $145 at the time.
    Jun 03 04:21 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Absolutely. North of $50 is a fair price. Whether the best price is $60 or $80 I don't know. Anything over $90 seems too much.
    Jun 03 04:27 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Its "war against the drug cartels?" What are you smoking? Plenty of books exist that will disabuse you of that myth. And while we're on the subject of myths, there has always been & always will be social unrest in Latin America until there are democracies in those "governments of men & not of laws" (if I may paraphrase many a North American president to reflect the Latin American reality - a reality toward which the north is rapidly moving). If it were not for the absurd War on Drugs (sounds noble, doesn't it?), which was started by Nixon to tweak the noses of those hippy subversives, Washington would have no excuse to send billions of dollars of foreign aid to put down one democratic movement after the other. But who can argue against helping a poor, well-meaning government fight those evil drug lords? If Champagne Shirley would be satisfied with his champagne and not insist on stuffing his nose with blow, we wouldn't have to give away taxpayer billions to corrupt governments who will then turn around and buy US-made arms to use against their own working classes.

    Wake up & smell the roses. Then read a book or two.

    Best,
    SOB.
    Jun 03 04:39 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The EIA publishes its weekly stock numbers on oil and other petroleum products each Wednesday. www.eia.doe.gov/oil_ga...

    or you can look at the raw numbers here:

    tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/...
    (Click on the Data 1 tag)

    This week analysts thought stocks would drop by some 2 million barrels. Instead they increased by 2.866 million.

    May 29, 2009 365.977 million bbls
    May 22, 2009 363.111

    That’s a 5 million bbls error which is huge. But it doesn’t begin to capture just how insane the oil market really is. This is the crude oil stock number from last year at this time.

    May 30, 2008 306.757 million

    We are currently carrying 59.22 million bbl more this year than last year. This is in large part due to the fact that the economy is doing so much worse this year. But that is rather the point. Supply is through the roof. The economy sucks, and the near oil crude future has doubled from its low of $30.28 which it hit on December 23, 2008 at the bottom of its collapse from the previous speculative binge, --or if you prefer the 2009 low, $34.03 on February 12, 2009.

    tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav...

    What this screams is manipulation. It is a subsidy for oil producers, a windfall for investment banks, and a hidden tax on already cash strapped American consumers.
    Jun 03 05:30 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    a message from the future. oil went really high...higher than anyone expected. time to get on board the alt energy train.
    Jun 03 07:34 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    There is another unstated and more important risk thats taken off the table by higher priced oil. The new guys at treasury and the fed have as their number one mission to take systemic risk off the table. If oil stays below $60 then there is a good chance for another systemic shock via a currency crisis ignited by a soviergn bond default via Russia. Its a given there is a coming tsunami of corporate bond defaults from Russia and Eastern Europe. But if they draw down Russias foriegn currency holdings below $200 Billion then a soviergn bond default is a real possibility similar to the last time Russia defaulted. The rubles already fallen so far and foriegn reserves were drawn down from $600 Billion to $380 Billion already in just 8 months. The fact is Russia couldn't make it to years end with oil at $40.
    Jun 03 07:48 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Oil in this price range means gasoline will be in the $2.50 to $3.50 range. It is hard to see that as good. Consumers have enough headiwnds right now without another budget-buster.
    Jun 03 08:37 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Given the condition of the international macroeconomy, $65/b strikes me as a reasonable price. I don't think for a minute though that our OPEC friends will be satisfied with it: they are already _____ and moaning about the price not being $75/b.

    About the situation with large inventories but a rising oil price, I intended to go into that in a long article that our colleagues at SA do not seem interested in. But, in brief, if we have a large enough contango in the futures market, it could make considerable sense to acquire and to hedge additional inventories, where hedging here includes paying the cost of storage. (Note the 'could'.)
    Jun 04 09:59 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Could it be that, higher oil prices will force GM and Ford, to finially wake up and build small cars. Why here in Colombia, are all of the taxis, GM, chevrolets, very small with stick shifts..less gas, less pollution..and they, Colombia, is supposed to be behind the US in every way. I am dubious, still, that, even with the re'emergence of GM, that cars will get smaller...wake up, please.
    Jun 04 01:02 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Anyone who says higher oil prices are good for the economy is an idiot, plain and simple. That's like saying getting get sick every now and then is good for the economy because it helps grow the health industry, or car accidents are good for new car sales. Totally stupid, flawed logic. Why don't you state the obvious, you own a bunch of oil shares?
    Jun 04 02:19 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Sounds so good. You have it all figured out. How bout this: as much as you have plus one dime. Are you fighting yet? How about this: Everything you wanted? Everything you dreamed of? Everything you thought was important? Here we are. Let's borrow another trillion from the Chinese. They do not care. They can live on nothing while we finance another hottub. Your god is for you alone.
    Jun 04 05:13 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Today's stockpile says nothing about tomorrow's availability. It is a depleting commodity. The only way you get it is to pay for it; costs of exploration (and its attendant risk), costs of production, costs of transportation and costs of capital. In some areas you also have to pay for running the country. If you want to pay less, you get less. The easy oil & gas has been found and produced. You will pay more. It's a lock. So how does one invest to cover the spead on the cost you want versus the cost you have to pay? Do your homework. Go long.
    Jun 04 10:31 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Oil and gas were manipulated by the future traders last year and now the refineries are cutting back to reduce gas at the pump and drive up the price. I think the summer driving season will be driving to the back yard and playing in the kiddie swimming pool.
    They are an estimated 10 million Americans out of a job today, Americans are driving less then they have since the 1950's.
    Fluctuations and hyperactive are words being used for manipulation and control in the oil industry. Plenty of crude today, around a 19 year high, and yet the price of gas is on the rise.
    We can all thank Phil Graham for that.
    So how about something original lets regulate the futures energy commodities market? Or better yet, free us from the use of oil altogether? The oil industry as a whole made around $476 Billion in net profit over the last 6 years, the pulse of the worlds economy is under the thumb of 13 OPEC nations and 5 major oil companies. Is this the legacy we want to leave our children and grand children?
    Jun 09 04:20 PM | Link | Reply