Pending Home Sales Better: Is it Time to Buy Homebuilders? 14 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
The National Association of Realtors pending home sales index increased by 6.7% to 90.3 in April. This marks the largest increase in that measure in more than seven years and continues a streak of three straight months of strengthening data. Pending home sales is regarded as a leading indicator because it tracks the number of contracts signed, however this does not always translate to a completed transaction. Polling of industry analysts had yielded consensus expectations for a gain of only .5%. Housing is comparatively more affordable now than any time in recent history as housing prices have fallen, mortgage rates hit historic lows, and the $8,000 tax credit for first time home buyers contained within the stimulus plan have all made buying a home more attractive.
Even though pending home sales have improved consistently over the past few months, as of yet existing home sales (recorded when the sale closes) have been much more volatile. Existing home sales were lower in February, increased in March and only slightly increased in April by about 2.5%. The disparity between the pending home sales and existing home sales suggests that mortgages are tougher to come by as banks have tightened their lending standards. This seems to correlate with recent data suggesting that lenders have not yet resumed lending at a historically normal pace. Either potential home buyers are taking longer to approve or are not being approved at all. However, as Brian S. Wesbury and Robert Stein of First Trust Advisors suggest bank lending is a lagging indicator, but their analysis focuses on commercial and industrial loans to businesses rather than mortgage loans. It would make sense that banks would be more conservative in their mortgage lending practices as well, as capital preservation is still at a premium right now.
The important point in this data is that it shows demand is starting to be pulled back into the housing market. It is on this news that homebuilders are getting a boost; as Hovnanian (HOV) leads the pack up 10% while DR Horton (DHI), Toll Brothers (TOL), Pulte Homes (PHM) are all up as well. However, as you can see from our chart of the Residential Construction sector, we are not at all positive on the stocks in this sector. There has simply been too much of a degradation in earnings and too many balance sheet damaging write-downs that shares have not fallen enough to justify us getting more positive on them.
Furthermore, there is still a huge overhang of supply of housing in the market, and the combination of housing starts having declined very rapidly and this renewed demand is the only way to bring the market back into something of equilibrium and stop the destruction of housing prices. In April, fueled by a record month for foreclosures housing inventory increased 8.8% to almost 4 million existing homes available for sale. That represents more than 10 months of supply given current pace of sales, but the initial buyer’s interest is being drawn into the market which is at least an encouraging sign.
It will be very interesting to see how the rise in mortgage rates will affect these developments going forward. The average 30-year mortgage rate has increased to 5.32% from 4.94% just a month ago. This data is a good sign, but it is still too early to tell if housing is turning a corner. Either way, the earnings potential of homebuilders in an environment where supply is still hanging over the market, makes us want to steer clear of those stocks.
Related Articles
|





















No
Jimmy,
I'm gonna grab a Scylla and help you out!
Nevertheless, this info will whipp the CME into a lather (there's about 4 guys in that pit). $250 is an operational break even for Lumber, anything below is being sold below cost. So, WY and the lot won't see a real benefit until it breaks that price.
On Jun 03 02:55 PM Michael Shulman wrote:
> I find the optimism amusing -- given the low base, existing inventory
> and the gigantic inventory overhang that is building. There are nineteen
> million vacant housing units in the US - only six million are listed.
> Banks are sitting on more than 600,000 homes they gave foreclosed
> but not listed, I am assuming they do not like current prices. Mortgage
> re-sets of funky mortgages - options ARMs and ALT-As - do not peak
> until mid- 2011 and these have unreal default rates -- Goldman Sachs
> puts the default rate for option ARMs at more than 60%. And defaults
> mean more foreclosures. Inventory will not stabilize until 2012 --
> maybe -- this is a statistical anomaly. A green shoot. I have twin
> boys, and when they were infants you could see green shoots coming
> through their diapers -- seems to me they are the same thing.
They face losing their homes this year.
On the other hand,I have seen the frantic buying of good properties at and above list prices from mid April to mid May.
The question is: Which wave is larger, the buying frenzy or the comoing foreclosures
If more jumbo mortgage foreclosures occur thru 2012- especially those on ARM's, ( I have read that is expected to happen), I would think that would drag down the inexpensive properties faster and harder, as the investor's dollar will go further.
On Jun 04 02:31 PM FL TAXMAN wrote:
> I am a tax preparer in South Florida. About 40 to 60 clients of mine
> have not been paying their mortgages these last few months,some a
> year.
> They face losing their homes this year.
> On the other hand,I have seen the frantic buying of good properties
> at and above list prices from mid April to mid May.
> The question is: Which wave is larger, the buying frenzy or the comoing
> foreclosures
On Jun 04 02:31 PM FL TAXMAN wrote:
> I am a tax preparer in South Florida. About 40 to 60 clients of mine
> have not been paying their mortgages these last few months,some a
> year.
> They face losing their homes this year.
> On the other hand,I have seen the frantic buying of good properties
> at and above list prices from mid April to mid May.
> The question is: Which wave is larger, the buying frenzy or the comoing
> foreclosures
TENS of millions of baby-boomers are poised to start retirement - grossly underfunded. 75% of their net assets are real estate. When these people all want to DUMP their second homes - SIMULTANEOUSLY, then we will see how relevant all those empty homes are.
On Jun 04 01:46 PM Charles Lieberman wrote:
> Your figures are accurate, but certainly misinterpreted, perhaps
> intentionally so. There are 19 million vacant housing units. However,
> this is a total figure that includes vacation homes, housing units
> for rent, housing units for sale, and a few other categories and
> much of this total is normal. For example, I own a condo in Florida.
> It should be in these figures, because it is vacant. When I'm there,
> my primary home is vacant. But neither my home nor my condo is for
> sale and to suggest they are part of the housing overhang is totally
> misleading.