Bernanke's Fiscal Focus 11 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Ben Bernanke’s testimony to Congress today starts with 7 paragraphs on general economic conditions, continues with five more paragraphs on the state of the financial sector, and then has six important paragraphs on fiscal policy. Finally, at the end, he spends one paragraph talking about what the Fed is doing in terms of monetary policy and quantitative easing.
This is reasonable enough: After having hit the zero bound, there’s not much which can be said about monetary policy, and fiscal policy is going to be the main driver of America’s standing in the international financial markets going forwards. What’s more, for the past couple of years the Fed has been working hand-in-glove with Treasury: The distinction between fiscal and monetary policy, and the independence of the central bank, have gone by the wayside (quite properly, I might add, contra Angela Merkel) in a time of crisis.
Still, it’s a little disconcerting to see the Fed chairman talk so freely about fiscal policy: now we’ve reached this point, it’s going to be hard to stop him talking this way, even after the crisis is over. And the distinction between the Fed chairman and the Treasury secretary is a useful one, which really should be maintained.
Update: James Pethokoukis, for one, seems to think that the Fed’s actions are divorced from the Obama administration’s economic policy. It’s not clear why.
Related Articles
|






















theburningplatform.com...
That alone should tell us how far this country has fallen in the past few years.
Fifty years to go from being the largest creditor nation to becoming the largest debtor nation. Oh, what a ride!
But he is still hopeful about growth later this year - I think he is referring to the growth of his beard - grey shoots.
Henry Ford...never more true now than when first uttered.
On Jun 03 08:55 PM Nik Kondratieff wrote:
> I don't think 99% of the general public realizes that a private organization
> is playing such a major role in setting fiscal policy, nor if they
> did, would be able to tell you the difference between fiscal and
> monetary policy. That said, it's a bit unsettling--if expected,
> given the current instability in our financial system and economy--that
> the Fed is shaping said policy and is beholden to no one but its
> member banks.
And again, screwing up and lecturing the world what to do.
Should I give you a review on details?
Perhaps if the Fed (& other central banks) had commented *more freely* on fiscal policy in the past, government debt at the start of the crisis would have been lower, leaving more headroom for fiscal stimulus...
Will be interesting to see what Obama's reforms have in store.