Seeking Alpha
About this author:

As numerous observers have said of late, the causes of oil’s substantial climb from about $40 to $70 were primarily the weakening dollar and purchases by investors and speculators (if there is a difference) to hedge their inflation fears. I’ve noted these causes ever since oil broke $50.

More recently I offered the view that some fundamental supply and demand pressures may be building on U.S. oil inventory levels due to the combined difficulties of four of America’s five largest suppliers, Mexico, Venezuela, Nigeria, and Canada, to maintain, much less increase, their supplies, perhaps accounting for recent inventory declines. Nonetheless, inventories are above the seasonal average and I am not suggesting there is anything like a supply squeeze developing; there are ample global reserve levels, including about 4 mb/d of spare OPEC capacity.

So the real question is: if the global economy shows further signs of starting to expand, will further speculative buying keep driving the oil price higher? My guess is that there is limited further upside from speculation because the higher the oil price goes, the more supply is likely to be increased. New supply will come from one or both of OPEC or greater production efforts and willingness to sell among non-OPEC operators. Given that there will be plenty of spare oil capacity in the world for the next couple of years as least, my expectation is that increasing supply due to higher oil prices limit those price from rising much further.

If, on the other hand, the world fails to pull out of the recession it’s possible that oil will retrace some of its recent gains. On the other hand, failure to pull out implies that the U.S. economy continues down. In that case the U.S. budget deficit will be further exacerbated and it will seem increasingly likely that the dollar will fall more rapidly, which will support the oil price. Therefore, I don’t expect oil to fall back much below $60.

Naturally, all bets are off if an unexpected political upheaval somewhere were to suddenly disrupt supplies or if fears of such disruption were to increase rapidly. Such could be the case if Iranian domestic political stress continues to increase or if toward year end the Israelis decide to attack Iran’s nuclear sites. Other potential disruption candidates are Nigeria and Iraq - a less likely candidate. Venezuela is more likely to see a steady deterioration of exports than a sudden rapid decline.

But absent a globally significant political card being played, I expect oil to trade more or less in line with the dollar over the next 18 months plus or minus. I think speculative buying is more likely to come out of oil in that time frame than to become more intense.

On the other hand, my analysis of fundamental supply and demand factors which I published in March indicates that supply shortness will become a factor within the next five years and possibly as soon as three years from now, due mostly to high and increasing rates of depletion. So at some time between 2012 and 2014 I expect to see record breaking oil prices.

Will much higher oil prices bring down the OECD economies and thus cut oil consumption rapidly as has happened after the 2007 - 2008 rise from $50 to $147? My guess is that OECD oil consumption will not have increased so much over the next 2 - 4 years that another economic downturn would be able to reduce it as dramatically. Also, a countervailing force will be the huge budget surpluses that higher oil prices will provide the exporting countries, which now account for 40% of global oil use. These countries have rapidly growing populations, rapidly growing needs for new infrastructure and industrial investments and with their greater wealth they will rapidly expand their internal use of oil, thus offsetting much if not all reduction in OECD oil demand from an echo recession.

The above projection, if accurate, suggests to me that if oil goes to $250 some time in the 2012 - 2014 time frame, the pullback will be limited to, say, $150, not to the $40 level reached recently. The next wave after that one would take it to, say, $400 with a pullback to $250 - perhaps in the 2014 - 2018 time frame.

This vision of permanently expensive and scarce oil calls for a very different world from the one we are accustomed to living in. I recently read Jeff Rubin’s new book, Why Your World is About to Get a Whole Lot Smaller. He doesn’t make specific price projections but he does flesh out the fundamental supply and demand vectors that will result in the sorts of price predictions I just made. He then suggests a number of ways that life will change because of the new reality of expensive oil. I found it compelling reading because it added a lot of factual information and a number of conceptual nuances to my understanding of our likely future of oil scarcity.

Print this article with comments

This article has 12 comments:

  •  
    Nice article! I think oil prices will rise faster than we think. Perhaps over the very short term (next 3 to 6 months), we may experience a small pullback in oil prices as the world realizes that the U.S. won't be contributing to world economic growth for the next 20 years. But the world will quickly realize (or submit) that countries such as China will be the primary economic engine of the world. With a population more than 3 times that of the U.S. and combine the fact that they are merely just "starting" to fully industrialize themselves, I anticipate that in as little as 18 to 24 months from now, we will be at a point where there is not enough oil production capacity to meet basic world-wide demand. In other words, if China were to consume the same amount of oil per capita as the Americans, we're already in deep, deep, deep trouble. We're looking at potentially $1000 per barrel or more in as little as 2 years. $2000 per barrel in 5 years. How's that for a scary thought?

    We desperately need GLOBAL energy reform....now....if we are to avoid the above scenario. Time is, indeed, running out. All the low hanging fruit has been picked. Going forward, oil will be increasingly harder and more expensive to obtain.

    The coming energy crisis will make this recession look like a walk in the park....
    Jun 16 11:28 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If it does, it is without me. Get me out of oil! I love a core long position in this commodity (see madhedgefundtrader.com...), and expect it to hit $200 before I join the AARP. But we have really gone too far, too fast, and are seriously in overshoot territory. Industry traders have been taking advantage of the greatest contango of all time, buying the front month contract, taking delivery, keeping it in storage, and reselling it forward to reap returns of up to 50%. And that is without leverage! Clever analysts are resorting to Google Earth to spy on storage facilities via satellite. Non industry players have been buying it as a dollar replacement. Crude burns better than dollar bills. As a result, crude in storage has ballooned to record levels. All fine and good when the price is going up. But crude can’t stay this high once the sugar high that is sustaining the economy burns off. Better to bail now at $70 and buy it back at $50 once reality sets in. And for Heaven sakes, don’t try to get to clever by shorting the stuff!
    Jun 16 02:11 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Oil is a few dollars, and a few weeks, shy of my predictions for its top this year.
    From here, the depression will kill commercial demand, which is a Huge chunk of total petro consumption.
    The downside is far, far lower than most people realize. Remember '79? I do.
    Jun 16 03:09 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I agree with everything you are saying except for the last sentence. I sold DXO and used the proceeds to buy DTO on Monday. I'll let you know how I do after two weeks - I think that's as long as it will take to see a few percentage points and cover my trade costs many times over. Then back on the long side ...


    On Jun 16 02:11 PM Mad Hedge Fund Trader wrote:

    > If it does, it is without me. Get me out of oil! ... Better to bail now at $70 and buy it back at $50 once reality sets in. And for Heaven sakes, don’t try to get too clever by shorting the stuff!
    Jun 16 05:37 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    So the $8 billion in Commodity ETFs that has come BACK to the market in the last little bit has had no barring? (someone should graph of money going into Commodity ETFs and overlay that over oil- it's the exact mirror both up and down).

    I guess, it's as you imply from your article that it isn't demand but rather some other thing that will move oil: it must be the hurricane season or the "summer" driving season, or political instability or what ever chaos theory suits/rules the day.

    I do have one question: what is up with the SOR? Is is a reserve or a drain. I cannot believe they are still putting oil in that thing. They wouldn't be buying oil, using the reserve, to create political stability for Russia and Saudi would they?

    The worst thing is the trade of last sumer becoming this summer's crushing blow tot he recovery: bid the dollar down, bid commodities up (this in turn will raise input costs to companies and squeeze the consumer) then short stocks because the raising input costs will not be offset by increase consumer demand.

    It's a terrific world the hedge funds, totally unregulated, have created for themselves- being a pariah on the consumer. I'm so glad they are unregulated! I'm also glad they aren't speculators but, instead, greedy disgusting little pin heads who create and no value-add at all. At least they will be able to afford their rentals in South Hampton, Nantucket and Newport this summer.
    Jun 16 05:58 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Think again. First of all, let’s get some facts straight. No one is buying oil here at $72 because they play to burn it, use it to drive more miles, make asphalt or plastics, or rub it all over their bodies. They are buying Texas tea because they hate the dollar and there is no other surrogate reserve currency. Some of the biggest buyers of crude now are the oil producers, desperate for any appreciating asset they can park their revenues in size. This is why you can now walk across the Caribbean and not get your feet wet, jumping from one storage tanker to the next. The world is choking of surplus crude. Does anyone see anything wrong with this picture? Even perma bull Boone Pickens has a target of only $75. I hope he remembers to sell this time (sorry for the cheap shot Boone). The problem is that when you have so many hedge funds, financial players, and non consumers bunching up in a trade, the turns can be particularly vicious. All it would take is a little more evidence of a double dip economy, or even just an innocently strong dollar. Watch those green shoots with a magnifying glass.
    Jun 16 06:41 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "The problem is that when you have so many hedge funds, financial players, and non consumers bunching up in a trade, the turns can be particularly vicious."

    It seems that the natural gas trade is also a little crowded as well, with many betting the oil gas ratio to close to more normal levels.
    Jun 17 07:30 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I'm in the process of giving some people the reason why they are wrong about speculators determining the oil price, and so I think that I will spread a little of my logic around.

    Speculators are human beings too, and on the average - as a group - they know more about the great world of oil than any other group, even if they don't know as much as Jim and myself. They not only have made some heavy bets on oil before, but on one occasion managed to double the price (100%) in a very short time, and on another occasion push it it up over 300% in a very short time. . BUT THESE WERE SPIKES, ánd these spikes were not sustainable because given the amount of oil in the crust of the earth, and how much they were finding, it didn't pay speculators or anyone else to keep betting that the oil price would stay up. Some did make that kind of bet, and they were hardly able to afford bus fare home.

    Things were different in 2008. When the speculators looked at the fundamentals, they saw oil demand outrunning oil supply. They started betting and kept betting until the macro-financial market meltdown changed most minds. Then they headed for the exit in a hurry. BUT NOTE, THE SPECULATORS ALSO EXAMINED THE FUNDAMENTALS, so I think that a little formal logic will show that the fundamentals rather than the speculators were the root cause of that escalation. Of course, some speculators got their ideas from comic books and late night entertainment channels, but as a group those people working for Gordon Gekko can read the signs even better than a lot of employees of big oil. If you don't believe anything else I say, please believe that.
    Jun 17 09:11 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    We can all thank Phil Graham for this mess. He re-wrote the futures energy bill that led to the Enron collapse. Great for large oil firms and the energy speculators who have inside knowledge into the industry. (almost sounds illegal doesn’t it?)
    So how about something original lets regulate the futures energy commodities market? Or better yet, free us from the use of oil altogether? The oil industry as a whole made around $476 Billion in net profit over the last 6 years, the pulse of the worlds economy is under the thumb of 13 OPEC nations and 5 major oil companies. Is this the legacy we want to leave our children and grand children?
    Jun 17 11:51 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    How about tapping the vast reserves we hold right here? Cuba is helping China drill for oil right off of our coast. How about using our reserves to control the price by manipulating the supply? If we so choose we can keep the price of crude at $40 a barrel indefinately. Drill here, drill now for fun and proffit.
    Jun 17 12:19 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The price of natural gas has been falling. The efforts that we went through trying to extract shale oil, were not good enough for oil, but turned out to be great for gas. You see, when you fracture the shale, embedded gas flows. Unfortunately this is not true for oil. To extract the oil from the shale you need fracture it and then heat it.

    So, while there is is plenty of oil in shale, it is expensive and very difficult to extract. With this problem oil has continued to deplete at about the same rate as in recent years. As the world economy recovers, the demand for oil is starting to increase.

    Betting that oil will stay below $75 next year is betting against recovery. Prices will rocketship, when the recovery starts in earnest.
    Jun 17 07:22 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    im not much on politices or in the market place but i do beleive oil will rise or at lease hold its current value. I think that we as a americans need to start thinking in developing alternative energy but we cant just through out coal in oil and gas production. we as americans and the world together have the smarts to do wonders. theres way to burn off coal and oil and gases cleaner for the sake of the world in its climate control problem. But i say we drill and produce for us as a country and get our shit together we are in a bind as is. and again how is the rest of the world feel about us in our problems? just askin because of the international trades and buying in saleing of everything? But what i do know is that i have a family, a wife in a three year old boy and im only 22 but been working in the oil field seen i was 17 and my dad did it, his dad did it and so on, and thats how we as a family have survied through out the years and with all the lay offs and drilling to a hault and the production as well as the mines i have seen alot of good hard working americans lose everything! and Pres. Obama promised all these jobs and etc. but the empolyment is higher then ever and good americans are losing there jobs family and much more. bottom line is if there aint going to be any jobs in the oilfield or coal mines then where are thesse other jobs that out Pres. promised? lets do something for us for a change. i know im not as smart as ther rest of ya but i just to get involved. Thanks for letting me enter my thoughts.
    Jun 18 02:15 AM | Link | Reply