Hedging Against ObamaCare: Potential Hedges Against Health Insurance Reform 9 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Worried about how President Obama’s proposed health insurance reform legislation will send interest rates soaring?
Many believe his health care reform, or ObamaCare, will be very inflationary along with the already enacted stimulus bill. The inflationary concerns related to proposed universal health legislation came up during an interesting and pretty balanced discussion today on Politico.com about the obstacles facing Obama’s health care legislation. The thread is pretty representative of the health care policy debates that have been going on over the last 35 years.
Among the big obstacles facing Obama’s health insurance legislation are predictions it will cost between $1 trillion and $2 trillion over the next 10 years. Opponents worry that the cost of providing insurance that will cover only a third of the uninsured, or about 16 million folks, will be inflationary. But 16 million would be double the actual number of uninsured American citizens, which is between 6 million and 8 million.
Whatever the cost, it’s expected to contribute to the inflationary spiral many are predicting Obama’s stimulus bill and other programs will cause over the next two to 10 years.
Scott Gottlieb, M.D., a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, writes that investors worried about ObamaCare should “short health care” and buy the ProShares Ultrashort Lehman exchange traded fund TBT (TBT), which tracks the 20-year bond. Or, if you don’t like the risk of trading an ultrashort exchange traded fund, you could short the Vanguard long-term bond fund (BLV). As interest rates rise in anticipation of inflation, bond prices shrink.
You can short health care by shorting the Vanguard Health Care Viper (VHT) exchange traded fund. But it trades less than 100,000 shares a day, which means it’s not very liquid.
Another way to short health care is to short Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), a major health care conglomerate that owns more than 100 medical device, medical supply and drug companies. I prefer to trade stocks instead of exchange traded funds, which charge small management fees of 0.10% and higher, but it’s easier to short heavily traded ETFs, I think.
Charts for TBT, BLV, VHT and JNJ are here. Click on a chart to see a gallery of charts for a stock or ETF.
There’s one small problem with shorting BLV, VHT and JNJ. They’re all in relatively good uptrends.
The gallery of charts for the ultrashort TBT is here. When the 20-year bonds drop in price, the price of TBT goes up with interest rates.
TBT’s daily chart is turning bearish even though it’s trading well above its 50- and 200-day moving averages. The PPO oscillator has fallen below zero, which is a sell signal. The CMF chart, which tracks cash money flow into and out of a security, also is pointing south.
TBT’s weekly chart, however, still is mostly bullish despite TBT’s current correction. Although TBT is still above its 50 DMA line, the line is declining.
TBT closed yesterday at $53.59. On its point and figure chart, TBT has a bullish price objective of $71 a share. But it’s threatening to make a bearish breakout if it falls to $52 a share.
Traders will play the charts. Longer-term fundamentalists will play the inflationary fears surrounding the health care legislation that is making its way through Congress.
Disclosure: I don’t have positions in any of the securities discussed above.
Related Articles
|























This article has 9 comments:
But I personally wouldn't even do that. This whole healthcare thing is in such a state of flux that I don't think I'm able to say at all what's going to happen to healthcare stocks at the end of it all. If you think you can, go for it.
What is clear is that new predictions this week that Kennedy's bill would cost $1.6 trillion over 10 years and reduce the number of unemployed by less than 15 million has given opponents new ammunition. Advocates don't have an answer.
It's also clear that anything Congress passes will be inflationary. And there is no way any of the gimmicks promoted by Obama will cut costs or expenditures.
I've blogged many times over the last six years about ways health insurance markets could be reformed in ways that would reduce insurance premiums without costing taxpayers a dime. But Kennedy and Obama are bent on creating a single-payer system that will attract billions in campaign contributions to the politicians who control health care spending.
Single-payer solutions are supported by about 21% of Americans, but their guys are in power. So who knows how this will turn out. I'm not trading in anticipation of any particular outcome related to health care, but I am trading anticipating more inflation.
I agree that we don't have a health care crisis. Obama has created a crisis in an effort to get his ObamaCare enacted. People are beginning to doubt his solutions more and more.
What we have is an education crisis. Uneducated people live unhealthy life styles, don't make enough money to buy health insurance and don't know how to deal with providers or insurers. They, do, however, seem to do pretty well when it comes to gaming Medicaid.
If more parents and families valued education and made sure their kids got good educations, more people would be economically literate, understand risks, know how to shop for insurance and providers and make more cost effective health care decisions.
"We won't rest until health care has been reformed. We won't rest until price is lower, quality is higher, and every American is insured."
Our President is no idiot. He's well aware of basic economic principles. You cannot take a finite resource and promise a demand increase of 16% without either:
(a) raising the price or
(b) driving down the quality.
This is Economics 101. Never mind the fact that the 47 million people who we are going to be "taking on" (medically speaking) are among the nation's worst offenders when it comes to poor choices regarding their health and diet.
If Mr. Obama is aware of the stupidity of his statement and the impossibility of his plan, why is he persisting? Power grab? Delivering favors to his political bedfellows? Maintaining / building a constituency? Or is he just a blind idealist? Whatever the case, this tripe is yet another clear proof that we cannot get a decent leader in this country.
Also, the two statements you described in your posts as "clear" are not clear at all. 10 year predictions are completely useless. They're usually built on a linear extrapolation of a very limited number of factors, not counting in a zillion of other future factors that can't even be known at this point, and which can be both good and bad. Just assuming that everything unknown will automatically be bad is just a personal opinion biased by your own worldview. This is no fact whatsoever.
Whatever Congress passes may be inflationary and it may be not. Unfortunately Congress is not solely responsible for inflation, so I have a problem accepting your forecast of higher inflation just because of this one factor / theme. Once again, there are one zillion other factors out there that influence inflation, not just what Congress does. Unless you get the great majority of them right, your forecast is once again just a personal opinion biased by your own worldview, which is "Everything Obama does is bad. God help us all".
On Jun 17 11:39 PM Donald Johnson wrote:
> Ozzy,
>
> I agree that we don't have a health care crisis. Obama has created
> a crisis in an effort to get his ObamaCare enacted. People are beginning
> to doubt his solutions more and more.
>
> What we have is an education crisis. Uneducated people live unhealthy
> life styles, don't make enough money to buy health insurance and
> don't know how to deal with providers or insurers. They, do, however,
> seem to do pretty well when it comes to gaming Medicaid.
>
> If more parents and families valued education and made sure their
> kids got good educations, more people would be economically literate,
> understand risks, know how to shop for insurance and providers and
> make more cost effective health care decisions.