Mass Migration and Water Problems 12 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Of course, the other side to any mass migration from California to Texas is the climate issue. This hits two ways. On the one hand, Californians are simply much greener than Texans. The latter require much more energy for climate control and they get most of that energy from sources that are far dirtier than those in the west. Every person who moves from coastal California to Houston pushes up per capita emissions in this country by just a little bit.
And then there are climate effects. California will face serious water issues, but Texas may well have it worse than the Golden State. By the end of the century, South Texas will see highs above 90 degrees for half the year, and the number of extremely hot days will increase significantly, as well. Texas will also face extreme vulnerability to flooding and tropical storms on the Gulf coast, and to drought, in much of the interior.
The heat problem will feed back to the emissions problem, as higher highs will generate more energy demand, which will lead to higher energy bills or greater emissions levels or both. Obviously, it’s very difficult to predict the effect climate change will have on things like metropolitan success and domestic migration, but it sure doesn’t seem as though Texas will draw the best hand in a much warmer world.
Related Articles
|






















> jack
As I see it, gas prices rise due to enviro concerns on lack of water and water pollution from shale fracturing in all the shale areas.
Who would have thunk it, higher gas prices due to water concerns
I predict we will see mass migration back towards the states everybody has been leaving for the past 50 years because they have water. Now if only the state governments in these old industrial states can pull their heads out of their butts and put in some decent government tax and spend policies that are not punitive!
The less people in Ca. the better. Includes the illegals that Senators Feinstein and Boxer ignore.
How dumb can you be? We destroy housing for more feeway lanes because there are more people. We destroy watershed forests for construction. We allow more people to inhabit the already water short lands and then we tax the heck out of the residents that are already here to pay for more water projects.
Dumb Americans.
California is blessed with an abundance of cheap, readily available water. Its not so blessed with clear thinking political leadership.
Steve Ward said above, "The counties in the heart of the Barnett shale have predicted a water shortage for 2010". This is the Austin area.
But, also in Dallas, where I live, the water source for the Dallas/Fort Worth area will be "tapped out" soon. I believe the time is 20 years. The Trinity River is just too small to serve this area. There are plans to build big reservoirs in East Texas and pump the water to Dallas.
Water is going to be a huge issue in the future, and it doesn’t take global warming to create the problem. The problem is simply overpopulation.
Desalination and alternative energy are a good match. Whenever there is plenty of sun and/or plenty of wind, desalination and/or associated water pumping can be increased, and visa versa. The ideal solution would be to keep desalination going 24/7 to maximize the plant cost, while water pumping is turned on and off as wind and solar energy peak and wane.
I need to read slower.