Tuesday Outlook: Commodities, Global Markets 24 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
<< Return to page 1 - Manipulated Markets
You can’t make this stuff up sometimes. Da Boyz on Wall Street own the markets and always have, but it’s never been this over-the-top and outrageous. It’s enough to shine light on this nonsense and see it for what it is—blatant market manipulation with taxpayer money. You won’t see much in the way of investigations because the powers that be are in the hood.
Now let’s move to earnings. July will feature a steady stream to please (spun as “better than expected”) and disappoint (just ignore those please).
The week’s young and so is the month. Let’s see how it plays out.
Disclaimer: Among other issues the ETF Digest maintains positions in: MDY, IWM, QQQQ, RWX, BWX, WIP, DBC, USL, DBB, EWA, and FXI.
The charts and comments are only the author’s view of market activity and aren’t recommendations to buy or sell any security. Market sectors and related ETFs are selected based on his opinion as to their importance in providing the viewer a comprehensive summary of market conditions for the featured period. Chart annotations aren’t predictive of any future market action rather they only demonstrate the author’s opinion as to a range of possibilities going forward. More detailed information, including actionable alerts, are available to subscribers at www.etfdigest.com.
Related Articles
|
























This article has 24 comments:
Smart money is apparently getting defensive (and as always manipulative) and the retail investors are apparently rushing in still to catch the rally that they missed thinking that they can get in on the recent dip. Does anyone see any strength here? I don't. The downside risk seems palpable and the upside potential muted to me. Looks very reminiscent of a bull trap here. Of course the powers that be always seem to push for one more last gasp so I am placing my bets all over this market roulette table.
I suspect everyone is waiting for earnings to signal the direction and I wonder if "better than expected" will no longer be good enough. My intuition favors the affirmative as the rally was based on an expectation that the recovery would be V-shaped and not L-shaped.
Good Luck all.
This is from the financial times 7/6/09. Front page. "Banks reinvent securitisation..."
Goldman is working on a scheme that would reduce the capital held against the assets.
"Goldman's idea, it would sell an insurance product to a bank with a toxic portfolio". "the insurance would require far less capital to be carried against it than the original assets.
Isn't this what got us into this whole mess in the first place. American's want real solutions not a set up for this to happen again and the bankers to collect billions ruining the economy once more. This sounds a lot like AIG. Haven't their misdeeds cost us enough. We'd rather wait for a real recovery that have to do this again anytime soon. Please stop the bankers from ruining anymore lives.
If this goes on Mr Fry is going to be able to automate his whole column, including the comments.
> If HAL is trading the market up, why not buy folks?
Why? Because it looks like HAL is trading the market down, at least for the time being...
www.zerohedge.com/arti...
As always the truth seems stranger than fiction. Thank you to Mr. Fry and Seeking Alpha for a glimpse of the truth. Without law, tyranny prevails.
Smart hedge fund operators then moved trades and custody to multiple organizations to avoid this crap.
So who do you trust? Thank God for the blogosphere!
On Jul 07 09:14 AM robert.b.ferguson wrote:
> I'm just holding dollars not because it's "better" but because it's
> handy. I would agree we are in "bull shooter" territory. Be very
> carefull here if you are a buy to hold investor or a trader there
> is plenty of misery comming for all to share. Especialy if CTFC puts
> limits in place and the knee cap our trade tax initiative passes
> the senate.
And your "oil" comment (USL) was rhetorical I assume?
cute.
Ignore the "jump in" mindset...tread cautiously (long, as you stated) and limit the exposure to theft. As hard as it is to defy the nature of investment, prudence in keeping it heavily liquid will win out.
On Jul 07 09:14 AM robert.b.ferguson wrote:
> I'm just holding dollars not because it's "better" but because it's
> handy. I would agree we are in "bull shooter" territory. Be very
> carefull here if you are a buy to hold investor or a trader there
> is plenty of misery comming for all to share. Especialy if CTFC puts
> limits in place and the knee cap our trade tax initiative passes
> the senate.
The manipulation shows so well in the charts. How do you trade in such a situation? Cash is getting ever more attractive right now, even with near zero interest rates. Anything else can swing against you, up or down, for no fathomable sensible reason.
On Jul 07 08:34 AM BigJake wrote:
> If HAL is trading the market up, why not buy folks?
On Jul 07 08:34 AM BigJake wrote:
> If HAL is trading the market up, why not buy folks?
I learned cynicism the hard way.
Do they really think we will collectively eat up any hair-brained story.
These guys dont even do simple fact checking anymore.
Bloggers are making up facts and their readership doesnt even notice.
A lot of bloggers realize that putting out paranoid swill for the tin foil hat crowd gives them a higher eyeball count.
But what about the qaulity of those eyeballs?
No. Volume is turning down because pigs really do get slaughtered. When, in fact, equity is dead money, what do the masses who got caught last year like a deer in the headlights do? THEY HOLD! Fantasizing that the status quo of the past couple decades will somehow soon return, weak hands hold, hoping to recover from last year's whipping. It is not gonna happen. Wall Street's credit bubble has popped. The best that can happen from here is that, the lender of last resort is able to control the bloodletting. Uncle Sam certainly CANNOT inflate the credit bubble with such vigor and reckless abandon as Wall Street before. This ALONE is critical to a return of the status quo of the past couple decades. And it is not gonna happen. Indeed, it CANNOT. Yet still weak hands hold, hoping for recovery.
On Jul 07 09:04 AM daniel3582 wrote:
> On Jul 07 08:34 AM BigJake wrote:
On Jul 08 02:48 PM Mark Bern wrote:
> Because manipulation can go both ways. Only those in control know
> what HAL will do next. BTW, if I read your comment grammatically
> correctly, I do agree that, yes, some folk have been bought.