Roubini Just Won't Turn Positive on the Economy 10 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
On CNBC Monday , Nouriel Roubini finally lapsed into incoherence:
When I look at [the economic data] I see so far still more yellow weeds than green shoots. They have to bottom out, in my view they haven’t bottomed out.
OK. I get it. No recovery yet. But then, in his very next sentence he adds:
This recovery, unfortunately, because of the debt overhang . . . is going to be a very weak economic recovery, in my view.
So the recovery is on again! Except that there is no recovery, and all those green shoots are really yellow weeds.
Which is it, already? In fact, if I read other recent comments from Roubini right, his near-term economic forecast is smack in the middle of the consensus: the economy will resume growth (perhaps “sharp” growth) in the second half, he says. True, over the longer term Roubini is much more bearish. Then again he’s always bearish over the long-term. It’s his marketing M.O.
Remember Neil Diamond? At every single concert the poor guy plays, he has to sing “Sweet Caroline” whether he wants to or not, or run the risk the audience might riot. Roubini is starting to remind me of Neil. In every interview he gives, he has to spout his trademark doom and gloom, regardless of what the data shows, or the reporters will stop calling. The Dr. Doom schtick is getting old. But I’m sure it’s still highly lucrative. .
Related Articles
|
























This article has 10 comments:
Roubini?
No!!!
I don't know whether roubini will be right about the economy (i do think he should in any case stop making stock market predictions). But I am pretty sure that any recovery, whenever it occurs will be vastly different than any previous recovery from a recession of the past 60 years.
My question to you is, tom, what is your point? what is the point of this article?
you mean to say that roubini will always be bearish and that he doesn't know shit? fine, but then again, haven't you stated this already a couple of times before?
I'd really like to read some insights into the current banking landscape from you as this clearly is a subject you know very well - and it certainly will have more substance than just some rant against some popular doomsayer.
I agree with you...
thanks