Base Metals Forecast: Sharp Steel Slowdown, Iron Ore Overcapacity 5 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
UNCTAD recently released a report forecasting a 15% decline in global steel demand, which comes after a 1.4% decline in 2008. While most of the world is expected to experience sharp declines in demand, even China is expected to see a 5% decline, though in 1Q09 China still eked out 0.8% of demand growth.
The global contraction in demand has resulted in extremely low May 2009 capacity utilization levels of 43%, 49%, and 55% for the steel industries in the US, Europe, and Japan. Again, even China, despite its growth, was recently about 78% utlization as per the UNCTAD piece, and via other sources is expected to see capacity utilization in the 70% range this year due to over-expansion of steel capacity.
What do the YTD data vs. forecasts tell us? We haven't seen the worst yet out of China. The UNCTAD report implies that most of the 5% decline in Chinese demand should be weighted towards the second half of 2009. The worst is yet to come from China in terms of steel demand, and keep in mind UNCTAD takes note of Chinese government stimulus plans. Falling capacity utilization forecasts for YTD vs. full year 2009 imply the same.
On the iron ore front, falling steel demand is butting up against iron ore production capacity growth and current under-utilization. Also, in terms of seaborne trade volume, despite the potential for smaller high-cost-basis mines in China to shut down (increasing the need for imported ore), seaborne iron ore trade is indeed expected to decline along with lower global, and particularly Chinese, steel demand. Clarkson sees seaborne trade volumes falling back to 2007 levels, as shown below.
For iron ore in general (seaborne or land-shipped), one particular UNCTAD chart really captured the problem ore pricing faces over the next few years, shown below. Essentially, new ore production capacity additions will outstrip new demand by a wide margin. While the demand estimate they use might be a bit too conservative, particularly if Chinese demand rebounds well, say in late 2010, the supply/demand gap is large enough to accommodate even a pretty substantial upside surprise in terms of steel demand for 2009 - 2011. Nevertheless, one feasible way to close this gap would be if a sizable amount of Chinese ore production shut down due to high costs, and do so very rapidly, faster than UNCTAD has put in their numbers. It's a bit of a long shot. Net-net, while iron ore is becoming increasingly controlled by only a few players (Vale (VALE), Rio-Tinto (RTP)/BHP), despite recently higher ore prices amid contract negotiations, I wouldn't be too bullish on iron ore over a 2-year horizon even if major players can use their high market share positions to support pricing a little bit.
Related Articles
|























This article has 5 comments: