Is the Dollar Dead in the Long Run? 31 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Probably. Of course the market knows about America’s troubles and some of them are priced in. Currency traders would also remind me that currencies are priced relatively to each other: we speak of yen per dollar, or dollars per euro. So if you are bearish on the dollar you can’t just prove that the dollar is weak. You need to show why it is weaker than the alternatives as well.
Before doing that I will concede the obvious: other countries also have troubles. We are in a recession, and so is just about everyone else. Our Federal Reserve is printing ridiculous amounts of money, but other central banks are too. Our government runs a large fiscal deficit, but again, other countries do too. Our banking system is weak, but the Brits and the Eurozone have nothing to write home about here either.
So if other countries are hurting too, why should the dollar stay weak? I have four reasons, but they boil down to one. We are no longer acting as if we can carry the burden that goes with the privilege of owning the world’s reserve currency.
First, we are unique in the large current account deficit we run. That is, we import more than we export, we have been doing this in size, and we will seemingly continue to do so until other countries stop taking our dollars in exchange for goods. We were lucky earlier this year in that a lower oil price reduced our oil import bill, but oil’s price has doubled off the bottom since then. So, even though Americans buy less imported “stuff” than we used to, we can’t consider the problem solved. As long as we import more goods than we export, we have to make up the difference by selling dollar denominated securities –usually Treasury bonds– to foreigners. So in this way America continues to increase the supply of Treasury IOUs without regard to the world’s demand for them.
Which leads us to reason number two: there is a large overhang of dollars held reluctantly in foreign portfolios. This site’s readers know that, but the point is, portfolio overhang is unique to the dollar, as opposed to other currencies. There is no other currency held in such size by people who would likely dump it if they had their druthers.
Plenty of people try to tell us that this overhang is “not a problem.” They say that the world is used to running on dollars. Governments, banks and corporations are used to doing dollar based transactions, they tell us. Moreover, no other currency can match the deep and liquid market that Treasurys afford. Even though the Eurozone is a huge economic bloc, Eurobonds issued by Italy, for example, are not the same as Danish or German government bonds. So everyone agrees that a complete transition to a new currency regime would take time, but is that truly a reason for doing nothing? It may be that today the dollar is the best place to park wealth, but sooner or later the countries with wealthy central banks will find a way to put their money where they want to. If we don’t make the dollar more attractive, foreigners will eventually take their money elsewhere. It’s that simple.
Our press also lulls itself into complacency regarding large dollar holders such as the Chinese. It would be hard for China to sell in size, dollar bulls say. The market couldn’t absorb that selling, the dollar would crash, and the Chinese would themselves wipe out the value of their own dollar holdings, bulls argue.
On the other hand, others worry that China may reduce its dollar buying going forward. Therefore these days when the Treasury holds an auction to sell more Treasury debt, traders await the results with bated breath to see how easily the market absorbed the supply — and how many foreigners bought. Furthermore the WSJ reports that the Treasury recently rejiggered its statistics so as to make foreign buying look heavier than it really is (h/t, Trader Mark). Treasury now reports some customers of primary dealers as “indirect” bidders, the closely watched category that also includes international purchasers. What a disgrace, that America is so dependent on other countries, and that we lie about it to ourselves rather than face the problem.
As an aside, China is seemingly having a grand old time showing us who controls the dollar’s trade in the currency markets. On June 26 officials at the People’s Bank of China said that they wanted a new, supranational currency to replace the dollar as reserve currency, Bloomberg reported. Dollar Index futures, which trade based on a weighted average of major tradable currencies, gapped down 55 basis points — a considerable move — to open at 80.12 on the CME the following morning. On the 28th Central Bank governor Zhou Xioachuan said that his country’s reserve policy remains “stable.” The dollar index shot up enough to close the gap of the previous day during overnight trade, though it gave up most of those gains before the Chicago open. Are the Chinese placing trades so as to profit from the statements they make thereafter? I have no idea but the prospect must tempt them.
Third on my list of problems unique to the dollar is this: America’s strategic rivals act as if they see an opportunity to weaken us by attacking the dollar’s privileged status. Russia’s Vladimir Putin has made noises about replacing the dollar for years. If Russia can take the dollar down, that would make it harder for the US to finance its 800 or foreign military bases, and give Russia freer rein in Eastern Europe, South Asia, and the Middle East. Similarly, China has never liked the military power that the US projects into the Pacific. So on this score some of China’s geopolitical objectives may coincide with Russia’s.
Also on our list of geopolitical considerations: in yet another chapter in the troubled history of Iran-US relations, Iran quit accepting dollars for oil in 2007. Might other oil exporters follow suit? Or might they simply accept other currencies in addition to dollars when they sell oil? The latter policy would reduce demand for dollars while still allowing us to pay for imported oil in dollars. There have always been countries that want to see America humbled but I don’t think these attacks on the dollar would have got traction if our rivals were not holding large stacks of dollars they might like to sell if they could. No other major power is in debt to its rivals like we are.
My fourth reason for ongoing dollar weakness: we don’t have a strategy for maintaining the dollar. We just keep hoping that China and our other trading partners will continue to do what suits us. That’s irrational. Other countries that hold dollars will act in their own interest. We should figure out what that is likely to be and prepare accordingly.
Instead, the Fed and the Treasury focus on economic stimulus and bailing out weak banks. The US keeps spending and printing money as if it grew on trees. Nor does President Obama talk about retooling our stance as importer from the world. And so the situation drifts. Sooner or later our government will learn what every trader knows: Hope is not a strategy.
Related Articles
|























This article has 31 comments:
As soon as another currency shows itself to have the support of the world's traders, or important trading nations get together to create a new one, that would signal the end of the U.S. Dollars reign.
The problem with focusing on the dollar as a starting point for US economic policy, is exchange rates are a symptom, not a cause. In the lead-up to the recent financial conflagration, the dollar was weak because prevailing economic conditions. Large US demand for finished goods and commodities caused USD to flow overseas... when the sh*t hit the fan, people panicked and bought treasuries (USD)... as fear subsided, the dollar came back down...
So, now what? Well, I think your view of the economy should inform your USD view and not vice versa.
and by the way, china wont just "dump 2trillion accumalated during decades, overnight" this is stupid. its more than clear that , yes, they are "exchanging" their positions for commodities, building gold stock piles, investing in oil (petrobras royalty oil) and so on.. but.. no.. they wont dump the dollar over night, what is pretty good, so, it gives plenty of time for US to come out with a strategy.. hope they have one.. or.. will just keep the bad habits, consuming, consuming, consuming and borrowing, ohh boy, then.. they will overdose, and leave a f.up country to their kids.
Regarding my allusion to Keynes: things move much faster than they did in Keynes's time and I don't care to be on the wrong side of the bigger forces, though that means I occasionally have to stop out and reposition.
It took 30 years for Europe to come together on the Euro, and even then it is just barely a European currency. What's more, the European central bank has very little appetite for taking on the whole world. They simply won't print that many Euros.
That leaves gold, but again, gold's greatest strength -- it is in short supply -- is also its greatest weakness: as a reserve currency, its liquidity is very poor.
The reason China holds so much US debt is due to their seller financing programs: they are willing to accept US dollars in order to sell us their goods. The recent drop off in dollar accumulation says more about US consumers than it does about China's view of holding dollars.
As far as I can see, the only way the dollar ends its reign as world currency is if the US stops it by restricting it, somehow. The world would then be forced to some less appealing alternative, and world trade would probably suffer, as it did when there was a gold standard.
Finally, both Russia and, especially, China are figuring out that it is expensive for them to talk down the dollar.
China is pursuing a smarter alternative using the new dollars to buy and hold commodities as a dollar hedge, but they are learning the limits to that strategy, as well.
At the end of the day, the only way China gets paid is by using those excess dollars to buy US goods or by investing in other US assets.
This is NOT to say that the current massive dollar printing by the Fed is not a huge potential problem. The excess world dollar liquidity helped to fund the last US asset bubble, and I expect that we will see other bubbles (Gold?, Oil?, Treasuries?) in the future.
But, I am not sure this means inflation returns soon. If we don't have wage inflation, especially in a service economy, I don't see how we get overall inflation, and it is really hard to see labor driving a hard bargain in the foreseeable future.
The people I know are happy just to have a job, and some of them have taken significant wage cuts. The prospect of wage pressure seems very remote, to me.
We will see pockets of inflation in commodities, but if we learned anything about the last oil bubble, if people can't afford $4/gallon, they quit driving. The also quit buying other things to pay for the driving they have to do.
Paradoxically, this could lead to deflation, as economies, reeling from commodity bubbles, contract like we've seen recently.
On Jun 30 08:14 AM Ray Winter wrote:
> The Dollar will continue to be the world's foremost trading currency
> until such time as there is a creditable alternative.
>
> As soon as another currency shows itself to have the support of the
> world's traders, or important trading nations get together to create
> a new one, that would signal the end of the U.S. Dollars reign.
So Mr Bernstein tell the world and Chinese not to count us out too soon and don't underestimate the ability of change in the good olde US of A. Fortunately, NOTHING is set in stone in the USA...except perhaps the ability to change our political, economic or social course more quickly than China or most other countries. Just ask the Japanese who thought they owned America in the late 1980s or the Iranians who are trying to change their political system.
Today it is. What other potential benchmarks are there? Gold? Maybe. The Euro? Gold help us. Yen? No way. Sterling? That's ridiculous.
The challenge isn't picking holes in the dollar. It's finding a credible and suitable alternative.
2. The issue is not the either the dollar OR something else(over the nxt 10 yrs) but the dollar AND someting else
3. In my view the dollar will go thru a 2 stage process of demotion. First the dollar moves from sole to primary reserve currency and second, from primary to first among equals
4. In stage One, 2 or 3 alternative and tentative currencies will be tried , probably based on globally critical economic resources(eg Energy, bandwidth, iron ore). Markets, not governments,
will propose, intoduce and test these currencies in the next 10 years
5. I suggest, for discussion, that 3 preconditions must be satisfied before Stage Two of the dollar demotion occurs.
(i) the US share of the global economy declines to about a quarter
(ii) there must be some very small coaltition of non -US economic actors who can command about a third of global output and agree to back an alternative reserve currency.
(iii) Japan and Germany move much closer to the Global South economically and also conclude that the US cannot be a consistent strategic partner in trade , geo-strategy and missile defence
You make some very good points - esp regarding the idea that there needs to be a basis in resources for a replacement global reserve currency.
I would add to your conditions (even though I didn't really understand what your (iii) entails) that there needs to be a very liquid market for bonds trading in the alternative global currency.
If this was to develop - and I think it could in the next 10 years) then there is no reason why the US dollar would need to be relied upon by the largest creditor nations.
It would also provide exactly the kind of incentive for the US economy to deal with its debt crisis.
China's economic, social and political problems might topple the regime, if their main customer didn't buy their goods any more. You don't bite the hand that feeds you.
Europe and the rest of the world, with few exceptions, would suffer in different ways and degrees, but all would suffer more in most cases even than we would. "Atomic" economic warfare isn't something many big countries are tempted to try out. No models are available to predict any one of the all horrific potential outcomes.
However, "conventional" economic warfare may be tampered with by some for political et al influence along the lines of talking down the dollar or proposing alternative reserve currencies (China, Russia, Middle East etc) and therein may lie the real risk for US.
Saving and growing ourselves out of our spendthrift old ways is possible, though, and may even have started just ever so sudly. If anybody can do it, we are the most flexible and best equipped as a Nation to get it done.
I'd say if the dollar is down 95% in the last 100 years, then the question has already been answered.
Stop the insane entitlement spending!!!!
www.kwaves.com/fiat.htm
On Jun 30 09:11 AM the.bighouse wrote:
> One thing the Founding Fathers fortunately built into our system
> of government is flexibility, politically, socially and economically
> which gives us the ability to change course in times of political,
> social or economic emergency. Though the USA's abilitty to change
> course may seem slow at times, it is far faster and more a part of
> our system than most (if not all) societies and governments on the
> planet. This coupled with the size of our central economy is a built
> in strategy thanks again to those who came before us in the USA.
> You say that Hope is not a strategy. But having a built in fail-safe
> strategy thanks to our forefathers just might be our saving grace
> the strategy you fail to see.
> So Mr Bernstein tell the world and Chinese not to count us out too
> soon and don't underestimate the ability of change in the good olde
> US of A. Fortunately, NOTHING is set in stone in the USA...except
> perhaps the ability to change our political, economic or social course
> more quickly than China or most other countries. Just ask the Japanese
> who thought they owned America in the late 1980s or the Iranians
> who are trying to change their political system.
On Jun 30 04:14 PM The Recusant wrote:
> Dead? No, just very, very ill. Since the dollar is still 2/3 of the
> world's cash reserves is will serve the purpose of being the international
> monetary currency for a long while. China, Russia, and the rest of
> the countries to follow, will slowly divest themselves of their dollar
> reserves and replace the reserves with other currencies and gold,
> the age-old and now de facto standard. The dollar will still be the
> king but worth less and less as the quantity of dollars grows with
> the stimulus packages and spending. It may take years, but its days
> are likely numbered. Gold and Sterling, may see a rise in price and
> be the "backing" of the new currency that comes along to replace
> the dollar. For some insight into the near economic future, try reading
> "Financial Armageddon" by Michael Panzner or his newer "When Giants
> Fall", out earlier this year.
"Currency traders would also remind me that currencies are priced relatively to each other: we speak of yen per dollar, or dollars per euro. So if you are bearish on the dollar you can’t just prove that the dollar is weak. You need to show why it is weaker than the alternatives as well."
The above is 100% true and I am glad you pointed out the other side of the argument. Of course the Yen and the Euro and the Sterling all face their own problems.
That having been said, other currencies being "less weak" does not make them safe havens. A slightly less weaker currency is STILL a weak currency.
For investors, the final solution is to hold non-currency assets.
On Jun 30 01:38 PM hksche2000 wrote:
> The US is the ultimate "TOO LARGE TO FAIL BANK" and the rest of
> the world knows it.
> China's economic, social and political problems might topple the
> regime, if their main customer didn't buy their goods any more.
> You don't bite the hand that feeds you.
> Europe and the rest of the world, with few exceptions, would suffer
> in different ways and degrees, but all would suffer more in most
> cases even than we would. "Atomic" economic warfare isn't something
> many big countries are tempted to try out. No models are available
> to predict any one of the all horrific potential outcomes.
> However, "conventional" economic warfare may be tampered with by
> some for political et al influence along the lines of talking down
> the dollar or proposing alternative reserve currencies (China, Russia,
> Middle East etc) and therein may lie the real risk for US.
>
> Saving and growing ourselves out of our spendthrift old ways is possible,
> though, and may even have started just ever so sudly. If anybody
> can do it, we are the most flexible and best equipped as a Nation
> to get it done.
The US, Australia and Canada are 3 countries I know of who have blocked Chinese attempts to buy large industrial assets as being contrary to their national interests. China is trying to convert its dollars into assets and is succeeding except for in Western countries. Meanwhile US oligarchs roam the world buying politicians with freely created US$ then snapping up their national assets for a song, like the post-communists were doing in Russia before Putin stifled them.
This is about empire, not 'free' global trade. Countries like China and Venezuela who restrict foreign capital flows are practicing national self preservation against the chorus of 'open markets' that the oligarchs preach but don't practice. Even as an American citizen, if you are not among the oligarch class you are just another peon to be pillaged.
That said, the dollar is nowhere near dead. Rome devolved from a Republic to an Empire in 63 BC when Julius Caesar defied the Senate and effectively became Rome's first absolute ruler. But the sheer scale and breadth of Rome's power and influence was enough to keep the empire intact for nearly 500 more years. Life moves faster today, of course, and I don't think US hegemony and the supremacy of the US$ will last another 500 years. But unseating the US is going to be a very long process. There will be giddy heights and near death experiences during this process so there will be plenty of upside and downside to trade along the way. But keep your forex sights short term because I think volatility is here to stay. Our grandchildren will be having this same debate about 'when' the US$ will decline.
Good luck and good trading
Dave
It is even more difficult at this time for other nations to risk their economies on another currency. Sort of "The devil you know..." kind of situation. But recent currency deals by China (and their interesting announcement of increased gold purchases) with Brazil and Argentina tell us that they are doing what they always do-- planning far ahead. The world is starting to develope a Plan B.
What we may see in a few years, especially if our government continues down the road of reckless spending, is a slightly diminished role for the dollar and some sort of "currency basket" having a smaller secondary position, as China and Russia have been pushing for.
There is time for the US to get its financial house in order. But, as Jim Rogers points out, the West comprises the world's biggest debtor nations, and the biggest creditors are the Asian nations. If history is to be our guide, that does not bode well for the US.
1. Massive forgein protfolios held in US and in USD, including SWF sovergen wealth funds........ They cannot afford to let USD lose its value.
2. There is currently no alternative to USD as the reserve currency
3. EURUSD at 1.6000 in 20008 was height of carry trade, (ECB even rasing while fed was dropping), + cobimed with a huge oil spike at the time equated to huge USD weakness
4. SNB have already intervened to stop CHF from strengthing too much
5. BoJ will start to intervene below 90
6. Political pressure regarding a strong EUR will be rife in europe if EURUSD goes to 5000 - 6000 range
7. There is a lot of bad bank debt in europe which has not been fully scrutized to date
8. ECB are pumping more liquiduty into the system than the Fed
9. USD index 40 year chart
michaelhaupt.com/blog/...
We are at an interesting stage now, it could contniue the multi-year bul bear cycle or could break into compltete new range.......
1. The stability of oil and other commodities
2. Global inflation
3. Solving the Fed policy dilema, (support USD vs support economy)
4. Relieving the ECB
5. Re-instill global confidence in US asset markets
6. Control inflation and the USD peg in the Gulf states
7. Protect China's and other Sovergein Wealth funds existing investment in the US
Are all reasons why the world would not want the USD to collapse.
Excuse all the numbers
Just watch out for USD strength in H2.......... I would call 1.5000 ball park medium term top for EURUSD