Dear World: Please Stop Lending the U.S. Money 16 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Figures in this article are from here (.pdf) and here (.pdf) :
It is well known that government tax revenues are crashing, and costs are skyrocketing. One of my ongoing concerns has been the U.S.'s proximity to crossing the budgetary "event horizon", the point of no return, beyond which we are committed irrevocably to some catastrophic financial event. In case you didn't just notice, in my opinion we haven't yet had a genuine catastrophic event. I believe that "can" has merely been kicked down the road.
Until now I haven't bothered to take a quick look at the proposed budget, but the absence of any other published analysis of that budget raises my brow a bit, so here goes: a quick analysis of the White House Occupant's proposed FY2010 Budget follows. I am especially interested in the condition where we are borrowing merely to maintain mandatory spending. Deficit levels have a huge impact on the world's perception of the future status of the USD as reserve currency.
As it turns out, depending on how you define "mandatory spending", we've already crossed the event horizon.
"Mandatory" spending is listed as consisting of: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, TARP, and "Other Mandatory Programs". Defense spending is listed separately, but I consider defense spending to be non-discretionary. Why? Because of the dollar's status as reserve currency. The moment the U.S. fails to maintain its status as global power, the world will abandon the USD. The power of the U.S. in world affairs is no longer based on our productive economy; we are NOT the economic powerhouse we once were. Further, there is absolutely no indication of any intent by the U.S. to decrease defense spending. This is one critical area where the deflationists' comparison of Japan to the US falls apart.
Assumptions contained in the White House's budget are outright laughable, beginning with the title of the budget itself: "A New Era of Responsibility." Net receipts from taxes are shown to fall by 1.7% for FY 2008, and fall by 14.5% for FY 2009, but then a miraculous recovery (Green Shoots!) happens for 2010 and tax revenues increase by 8.2%, then increase again in 2011 by 15.1%, then again in 2012 by 14.5%. No L-shaped recession here! Believing these numbers requires you to believe we can borrow our way to prosperity.
Year | Gross Receipts | Delta Receipts (%) |
2005 | 2154 |
|
2006 | 2407 | 11.7455896 |
2007 | 2568 | 6.688824263 |
2008 | 2524 | -1.713395639 |
2009 | 2157 | -14.54041204 |
2010 | 2333 | 8.15948076 |
2011 | 2685 | 15.0878697 |
2012 | 3075 | 14.52513966 |
Federal outlays have got some green shoots going on themselves; Federal spending ramps up dramatically in FY 2009 and then actually falls in 2010, then remains stable for 2011 and 2012. Health care "reform" is included in these numbers.
Year | Gross Outlays | Delta Outlays (%) |
2005 | 2472 |
|
2006 | 2655 | 7.402912621 |
2007 | 2729 | 2.787193974 |
2008 | 2983 | 9.307438622 |
2009 | 3998 | 34.02614817 |
2010 | 3591 | -10.18009005 |
2011 | 3615 | 0.66833751 |
2012 | 3633 | 0.497925311 |
These rosy assumptions are required in order to predict a falling deficit and get us back to our "new era of responsibility" that is certain to start just as soon as the next guy comes into office, or maybe sometime later, or probably never. Mostly, these rosy assumptions are a transparent attempt to save the Treasury market.
Forgive my crude chartology, but here are the numbers in graphical form:
It is easy for even a fool to see what this chart would look like if it were not for the rosy assumptions of the "new era of responsibility". Even a bond market genius, whose entire genius career took place during a 20 year-plus era of falling interest rates and who frequently pumps Treasuries, can see that we're screwed. The regime of falling interest rates is over, and the outlook for bond market geniuses is grim.
It is also easy to see that, as a nation, we are borrowing simply to maintain mandatory expenditures. We are borrowing to maintain our status as world power; in effect, we are begging the rest of the world for handouts so that we can maintain hegemony over it. I for one do not expect the world to continue to feed the dog that bites it.
Deflationists are fond of quoting Mises out of context in an attempt to convince us that deflation is coming and that we should buy Treasuries. They want to fix your attention on the obvious deflationary forces that are in play. Above I have shown that deflation cannot be allowed to persist, as we have already crossed the threshold where we are borrowing just to maintain mandatory expenditures. Inflation is the policy that central banks and the government must pursue.
The public must be made to continue to believe in deflation in order to save the Treasury market. It is absolutely essential to understand this: were the authorities to make clear their intentions, everyone would immediately place the appropriate bets and the outcome would be self-dependent. The authorities know they must maintain doubt as to their intentions. But the facts remain: there are two ways out of this crisis: 1) a magical increase in productivity that will enable sufficient surplus to be produced so that debts can be repaid; 2) the present value of the debt must be reduced somehow, either by default or inflating it away. Sovereign default causes a currency crisis. Inflation causes...inflation.
I'd like to present an extended Mises quote of my own:
This first stage of the inflationary process may last for many years. While it lasts, the prices of many goods and services are not yet adjusted to the altered money relation. There are still people in the country who have not yet become aware of the fact that they are confronted with a price revolution which will finally result in a considerable rise of all prices, although the extent of this rise will not be the same in the various commodities and services. These people still believe that prices one day will drop. Waiting for this day, they restrict their purchases and concomitantly increase their cash holdings. As long as such ideas are still held by public opinion, it is not yet too late for the government to abandon its inflationary policy.
But then, finally, the masses wake up. They become suddenly aware of the fact that inflation is a deliberate policy and will go on endlessly. A breakdown occurs. The crack-up boom appears. Everybody is anxious to swap his money against 'real' goods, no matter whether he needs them or not, no matter how much money he has to pay for them. Within a very short time, within a few weeks or even days, the things which were used as money are no longer used as media of exchange. They become scrap paper. Nobody wants to give away anything against them.
It was this that happened with the Continental currency in America in 1781, with the French mandats territoriaux in 1796, and with the German mark in 1923. It will happen again whenever the same conditions appear. If a thing has to be used as a medium of exchange, public opinion must not believe that the quantity of this thing will increase beyond all bounds. Inflation is a policy that cannot last.
Dear World: Please Stop Lending Us Money. I can't afford the payments. Congress is borrowing against the wishes of the American people, and we are growing increasingly tired of it. You will be lucky to be paid back at all.
Disclosure: The author is not a financial professional, so please do your own due diligence. The author is long precious metals and various other dollar short instruments, hedged by a substantial cash position.
Related Articles
|
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Authors with the largestSee all
increase in followers
in the last 7 days
Fastest Climbers » -
Top Commenters
Top commenters,See all
as ranked by their peers
Top Commenters » -
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most active
Instabloggers.-
1
David Fry
-
2
TraderMark
-
3
Don Dion
-
4
Cliff Wachtel
-
5
Mike Havrilla
Top Instabloggers » -
1
-
Top StockTalkers
TopSee all
StockTalkers.
Top StockTalkers »
We'll wake up one day and the price of all commodities will have risen 50% while we were sleeping.
In only a few days, we'll go from "cash is king" to "cash is trash."
Food hoarding will follow quickly.
Then, food riots.
Short: Treasuries.
We're in the preliminary phases of this, so it's anybody's guess as to when it's completely obvious. The bond market and yields are an excercise in exponential algebra, 4.3% for 30-year bonds is ridiculous.
Why hoard cash if the currency is on its way to being debased?
> I for one do not expect the world to continue to feed the dog that bites it.
Beautiful line
> Inflation is the policy that central banks and the government must pursue.
agreed
"since they are going down in value - we can we all just eat integrated circuits"
On Jul 07 01:27 PM yellowhoard wrote:
> I think the inevitable hyperinflation will hit us without warning.
>
>
> We'll wake up one day and the price of all commodities will have
> risen 50% while we were sleeping.
>
> In only a few days, we'll go from "cash is king" to "cash is trash."
>
>
> Food hoarding will follow quickly.
>
> Then, food riots.
Now before you start rolling your eyes, listen up. The fed controls the monetary base but it doesn't control the credit. At least not anymore since Greenspan essentially removed most of the reserve requirements in our fractional reserve lending system. The monetary base - the only part the fed controls - is only 10% of the money supply. The rest of it is debt. As this debt is destroyed, the money supply shrinks and does so faster than the fed can print.
A reduction in the money supply relative to goods and services is deflation. As usual, the main stream media and CNBC watchers have it all wrong. You can see deflation kicking in with falling silver and gold and oil prices. If this were an inflationary environment gold would be putting in higher highs, not a declining double top.
On Jul 07 02:34 PM Did U Think The Ponzi Scheme Would Last? wrote:
> I am not a government agent but I think its clear we will have at
> least a couple of years of deflation before we see any inflation.
> People keep focusing on what the fed is doing but that is misdirection
> because the fed doesn't control the money supply, private banks do.
> At least 90% of it.
>
> Now before you start rolling your eyes, listen up. The fed controls
> the monetary base but it doesn't control the credit. At least not
> anymore since Greenspan essentially removed most of the reserve requirements
> in our fractional reserve lending system. The monetary base - the
> only part the fed controls - is only 10% of the money supply. The
> rest of it is debt. As this debt is destroyed, the money supply
> shrinks and does so faster than the fed can print.
>
> A reduction in the money supply relative to goods and services is
> deflation. As usual, the main stream media and CNBC watchers have
> it all wrong. You can see deflation kicking in with falling silver
> and gold and oil prices. If this were an inflationary environment
> gold would be putting in higher highs, not a declining double top.
On Jul 07 01:27 PM yellowhoard wrote:
> I think the inevitable hyperinflation will hit us without warning.
>
>
> We'll wake up one day and the price of all commodities will have
> risen 50% while we were sleeping.
>
> In only a few days, we'll go from "cash is king" to "cash is trash."
>
>
> Food hoarding will follow quickly.
>
> Then, food riots.
1) But....I agree with Did U Think above entirely that we will face deflation followed by inflation for the same reasons he cited.
2) I don't fear the crash of the dollar for quite some time because this is a global problem. Just today, as I was gathering news articles for my blog there was one about how the major developed nations all realize it is in their best interests to support the dollar.
3) And I've felt strongly that Bernanke and the powers that be are trying to get us to think we will have inflation to keep us borrowing and spending, even though it is deflation they fear, too. I wrote a previous article about that here, on SA. (Just the opposite of what you are thinking.) And, having just compiled deflationary quotes (on my instatblog article) I can tell you they weren't that easy to come by.
I have never seen the status of being a "profesional" confer one iota of weight to any given argument.
Bill C
"Why hoard cash if the currency is on its way to being debased?"
Because I am aware that the form and schedule of the final outcome are not determined by me; that is to say, I view the economy as near completely manipulated, by forces foreign and domestic, and these forces are on their own schedule, not mine. My worst case scenario is a prolonged deflationary period which forces the middle class to liquidate assets to stay alive, followed by a hyperinflation event (currency crisis) that completes the destruction of the middle class lifestyle. The purpose of the cash is to avoid being forced to sell the dollar shorts during this potential deflation period. Low likelihood, high impact event.
DidYouThink,
"I think its clear we will have at least a couple of years of deflation before we see any inflation."
This is the line that is being kicked around, and while I consider it possible, I consider the possibility an outlier. The "couple of years" is I believe intended to keep us in the Treasury market for now; this same "couple of years" coincides nicely with the closing of the budget gap on the chart above, doesn't it? This "couple of years" is necessary to complete the fantasy that is "A New Era of Responsibility." I ain't buying it.
In the government's view, the "army" must be kept overseas, there are no jobs for returning soldiers, and DHS considers them too "easily radicalized;" this would be worse under the current conditions of joblessness. This is another argument for defense spending counting as a mandatory expenditure. Having said that, we are overstretched now, and the Navy is increasingly being engaged by China in the ASW game in the Pacific and IO.
Kalpa,
They'd like a nice, orderly inflation, like the one we saw from 2002-2005. They're not going to get it. They'd like us to go spend, but they want us and the markets believing in deflation. The interest portion of the federal expenditures can be kept low if deflation persists, but if deflation persists tax revenues will continue to fall and we will go ever deeper into debt.
Bernanke is trapped. More QE will be announced, as soon as the Treasury market is calmed by this stock market "correction."
I guess you know what I watched last night.
I seems like a national security event that our reliance on our largest debtors like China, Russia, Japan, Saudi, India is allowed to continue. They are no particular friends of te USA. Communist Regimes, Cold War ememies. Jumpers we dropped two atom bombs on Japan. We have opened ourselves up to the destruction of the last superpower, with military might beyond imagine with a military budget more than the rest of the worlds all put together. They could take us out without firing one single shot. Of course they would lose their investments but what would they gain, I would agrue more than they would lose.
America would be bankrupt, along with many other nations, what an opportunity to step in and take over. How does a powerful nation allow itself to become so vunerable that we teeter on the precipace of disaster? Why are our leaders not held responsible for what can only be a national security issue of the highest order, our existance.
I agree. The USA has very few friends.
The major emerging powers like China, India and Russia have too much to gain from US geopolitical collapse vs. their potential losses.
As for our leaders, they will pay an appropriate price for betraying the USA national interests.
The foreign creditors will probably suffer losses on their holdings, but this will be more than offset by the benefits of easier access to the resources needed to fuel their growth. However, it is foolish to forget that, apart from oil, the US is one of the most resource rich countries in the world and once the country has recovered from the shock of the adjustment, it will begin to grow again. Hopefully, in the new future, people will concentrate on the quality of life, with things like education returning to previous standards and levels of importance.