Electro-Optical Sciences: A Speculative Stock with Great Potential 6 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
My stock suggestion today is in the spirit of adventure. It’s a medical technology company that doesn’t really have revenues, much less earnings, and it doesn’t have a product approved for sale. What it has is a great idea for a hand-held device that will enable dermatologists to scan skin lesions to determine whether they are melanomas.
The company is Electro-Optical Sciences (MELA), and the device-called the MelaFind-uses light at various wave-lengths to scan the suspicious lesion. It then uses its database of melanoma images to calculate a diagnosis.
With a huge age cohort of sun-worshiping Baby Boomers now approaching the danger years, the diagnosis of melanoma, the leading cause of death from skin cancer, is a big deal. The MelaFind is non-invasive, quick, and reportedly has a 95% accuracy rate.
Electro-Optical has submitted a Pre-Market Approval form to the FDA for MelaFind. The FDA has put the decision on a fast track, and the estimated decision date is some time this December.
This is a low-priced, speculative stock, but the potential payoff is huge. If you’re the kind of investor who likes to spin the roulette wheel every once in a while, this may be for you.
Related Articles
|


























This article has 6 comments:
Disclosure: Long MELA
Benefit to the patient is that it is fast and non invasive.
For the busy physician, it allows better customer service to their patients who face potential cancer diagnosis and are anxious to find out results. As well, it provides better patient flow, i.e. more clients=more money as it frees up the physician's time that they would otherwise use to do unnecessary, expensive, invasive and time intensive biopsies.
I am Long MELA; >1000 shares.
On Jul 09 12:39 PM drd wrote:
> good idea but how will they make money? will they just sell machines
> (how many will be sold ?) will they charge per test
On Jul 09 02:23 PM PalinTologist wrote:
> It's my understanding that they charge for the device itself (relatively
> inexpensive at 5 grand) and then the recording 'card' which is used
> on each patient and stores the data of each test which costs the
> patient around $100 per test, of which MELA keeps $40 and the physician
> keeps $60 (above figures are not exact and only meant to convey the
> general idea, relative to the question asked).
>
> Benefit to the patient is that it is fast and non invasive.
>
> For the busy physician, it allows better customer service to their
> patients who face potential cancer diagnosis and are anxious to find
> out results. As well, it provides better patient flow, i.e. more
> clients=more money as it frees up the physician's time that they
> would otherwise use to do unnecessary, expensive, invasive and time
> intensive biopsies.
>
> I am Long MELA; >1000 shares.
>
> On Jul 09 12:39 PM drd wrote: