Are TIPS Still a Good Investment? 11 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
I've been recommending TIPS since last November, when their real yields spiked and the market expected inflation to be negative for many years. Since then real yields have come down a lot, and inflation expectations have moved higher, and the combination of those two developments have delivered excellent returns to TIPS investors since then (i.e., the iShares Barclays TIPS fund, (TIP), has more than doubled the return on the S&P 500 since the end of November, and the price of a 10-year TIPS bond today is almost 12% higher than it was in late November).
Are TIPS still a good investment?
It's not so easy to answer that question now. The performance of TIPS is a function of two main variables, and neither one today is saying that TIPS are screamingly cheap, as they were back in November.
To assess the attractiveness of TIPS, let's start with the first chart above. It shows the real yield on 10-year TIPS, which is a decent proxy for the real yield on the entire TIPS market. I think of the real yield as the inherent value of TIPS, since that is the yield you will receive on top of whatever the inflation rate happens to be. Earning a positive real yield should be one of the primary goals of any investment strategy. So the higher the real yield on TIPS, the more attractive they are relative to other investments, because the real yield on TIPS is guaranteed by the U.S. government, whereas you have no way of knowing up front what the real yield on other investments will be.
The top chart shows valuation "zones" based on the level of real yields. These are subjective, of course, but they are based on my observation that when real yields on TIPS are 2.6%, then the total return on holding TIPS (the real yield plus the rate of inflation) will tend to equal the long-term nominal growth of the economy. In other words, at that point TIPS become "nominal GDP bonds." As such, their returns will come close to the growth rate of corporate profits over time, and they thus begin to present serious competition to equities on a risk-adjusted expected return basis.
At current real yields, I think TIPS are near the high end of what might be considered "fair value." The fair value zone is where I think real yields will likely tend to average over time. It's also close to what real yields on Treasuries have averaged over long periods. In other words, if you buy TIPS today, you shouldn't expect real yields to rise or fall over time, which is another way of saying that the price of a TIPS fund is not likely to be significantly higher or lower than it is today on a long-term expectational basis.
So the main thing that will drive TIPS returns going forward is the rate of inflation, not any change in the level of real yields. Now consider the third chart, which compares the actual 10-year annualized rate of change in the CPI to what the TIPS market expects that rate to be over the next 10 years. As should be obvious, the TIPS market has tended to underestimate actual inflation. Today, TIPS are priced to the assumption that the CPI will average about 1.7% a year for the next 10 years, whereas the CPI has averaged 2.5% a year for the past 10 years. In short, the bond market is betting that future inflation will be much lower than past inflation. In light of the massive expansion of the Fed's balance sheet since last September, and given the bond market's historical tendency to underestimate inflation, that seems like a courageous assumption.
If actual inflation in the future is about what it has been in the past, then 10-year TIPS will deliver annual returns of about 4.4% per year (1.8% real yield + 2.5% inflation) over the next 10 years. That is almost 1 percentage point more than you would get if you buy a 10-year Treasury bond today. On that basis, I would argue that TIPS are cheap relative to Treasuries. I think the odds favor inflation being higher than the bond market expects, so that means TIPS should deliver better returns than Treasuries.
If you think inflation is going to be a lot higher than the bond market expects, then the annual returns would also be a lot higher. For example, if the CPI averages 5% a year, then TIPS will yield roughly 7% per year.
Bottom line: TIPS are no longer a screaming buy, because real yields are not particularly high. TIPS are attractive relative to Treasury bonds, however, and they would deliver handsome returns in the event that inflation ends up being significantly higher than the market expects. TIPS are an excellent way to preserve one's purchasing power over time, while earning a moderate real rate of return. If you want your money to be safe (assuming of course that the U.S. government doesn't renege on its obligations) yet still deliver a positive real rate of return, TIPS are an excellent choice. For many investors, TIPS look superior to cash as a source of risk-free returns.
Full disclosure: I am long TIPS and TIP at the time of this writing.
It's not so easy to answer that question now. The performance of TIPS is a function of two main variables, and neither one today is saying that TIPS are screamingly cheap, as they were back in November.
To assess the attractiveness of TIPS, let's start with the first chart above. It shows the real yield on 10-year TIPS, which is a decent proxy for the real yield on the entire TIPS market. I think of the real yield as the inherent value of TIPS, since that is the yield you will receive on top of whatever the inflation rate happens to be. Earning a positive real yield should be one of the primary goals of any investment strategy. So the higher the real yield on TIPS, the more attractive they are relative to other investments, because the real yield on TIPS is guaranteed by the U.S. government, whereas you have no way of knowing up front what the real yield on other investments will be.
The top chart shows valuation "zones" based on the level of real yields. These are subjective, of course, but they are based on my observation that when real yields on TIPS are 2.6%, then the total return on holding TIPS (the real yield plus the rate of inflation) will tend to equal the long-term nominal growth of the economy. In other words, at that point TIPS become "nominal GDP bonds." As such, their returns will come close to the growth rate of corporate profits over time, and they thus begin to present serious competition to equities on a risk-adjusted expected return basis.
At current real yields, I think TIPS are near the high end of what might be considered "fair value." The fair value zone is where I think real yields will likely tend to average over time. It's also close to what real yields on Treasuries have averaged over long periods. In other words, if you buy TIPS today, you shouldn't expect real yields to rise or fall over time, which is another way of saying that the price of a TIPS fund is not likely to be significantly higher or lower than it is today on a long-term expectational basis.
So the main thing that will drive TIPS returns going forward is the rate of inflation, not any change in the level of real yields. Now consider the third chart, which compares the actual 10-year annualized rate of change in the CPI to what the TIPS market expects that rate to be over the next 10 years. As should be obvious, the TIPS market has tended to underestimate actual inflation. Today, TIPS are priced to the assumption that the CPI will average about 1.7% a year for the next 10 years, whereas the CPI has averaged 2.5% a year for the past 10 years. In short, the bond market is betting that future inflation will be much lower than past inflation. In light of the massive expansion of the Fed's balance sheet since last September, and given the bond market's historical tendency to underestimate inflation, that seems like a courageous assumption.
If actual inflation in the future is about what it has been in the past, then 10-year TIPS will deliver annual returns of about 4.4% per year (1.8% real yield + 2.5% inflation) over the next 10 years. That is almost 1 percentage point more than you would get if you buy a 10-year Treasury bond today. On that basis, I would argue that TIPS are cheap relative to Treasuries. I think the odds favor inflation being higher than the bond market expects, so that means TIPS should deliver better returns than Treasuries.
If you think inflation is going to be a lot higher than the bond market expects, then the annual returns would also be a lot higher. For example, if the CPI averages 5% a year, then TIPS will yield roughly 7% per year.
Bottom line: TIPS are no longer a screaming buy, because real yields are not particularly high. TIPS are attractive relative to Treasury bonds, however, and they would deliver handsome returns in the event that inflation ends up being significantly higher than the market expects. TIPS are an excellent way to preserve one's purchasing power over time, while earning a moderate real rate of return. If you want your money to be safe (assuming of course that the U.S. government doesn't renege on its obligations) yet still deliver a positive real rate of return, TIPS are an excellent choice. For many investors, TIPS look superior to cash as a source of risk-free returns.
Full disclosure: I am long TIPS and TIP at the time of this writing.
Related Articles
|
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Authors with the largestSee all
increase in followers
in the last 7 days
Fastest Climbers » -
Top Commenters
Top commenters,See all
as ranked by their peers
Top Commenters » -
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most active
Instabloggers.-
1
TraderMark
-
2
Don Dion
-
3
Cliff Wachtel
-
4
Mike Havrilla
-
5
James Quinn
Top Instabloggers » -
1
-
Top StockTalkers
TopSee all
StockTalkers.
Top StockTalkers »
This article has 11 comments:
1. TIPS hedge against inflation, but the inflation adjusted return is based on a figure that is ultimately government defined. How much faith should we have in this figure? If inflation takes off and the goverment struggles to finance it's debts, will the definition of inflation be "managed"? Are there better ways of capturing "real" inflation?
2. I used to believe that the return was, as the article says "risk free". I assumed that, if it came to it, more dollars could be printed to repay me; and if this was seen as inflationary, my TIPS hedged me against that. Now I'm not so sure. The US debt position is increasingly unsustainable and others (e.g. the Chinese) will increasingly have a say in who gets repaid and how.
Hopefully, my concerns are misplaced and I don't pretend to know the answers here. I just thought I'd mention it................
If anything it seems you would want to focus on the long-term part of the curve as break-evens are far more attractive given historical inflation rates.
TIPS hedge against inflation, but the inflation adjusted return is based on a figure that is ultimately government defined. How much faith should we have in this figure?
**********************...
Bingo. If the government can save money on COLAs and TIPS by keeping inflation numbers low, what motivation would they have for measuring it accurately? They can inflate down the value of their deficits, while not paying up for their inflation-linked obligations.
On Jul 08 09:16 AM chap08 wrote:
If inflation takes off and the goverment struggles to finance it's debts, will the definition of inflation be "managed"? Are there better ways of capturing "real" inflation?
Social security is indexed to wages and, tacitly, to wage inflation, not to CPI. If wages in the U.S. generally increase, then Social Security benefits are increased as well. If wages stay flat during inflation--not an unimaginable scenario--the benefits will be flat as well. And if wages do increase, the funding for SS also increases, because both the benefit and the tax revenue are tied to payroll.
On Jul 09 10:20 AM _richard_ wrote:
>
> Social security is indexed to wages and, tacitly, to wage inflation,
> not to CPI. If wages in the U.S. generally increase, then Social
> Security benefits are increased as well. If wages stay flat during
> inflation--not an unimaginable scenario--the benefits will be flat
> as well. And if wages do increase, the funding for SS also increases,
> because both the benefit and the tax revenue are tied to payroll.
The SSecurity increases ARE tied to CPI , MINUS the increases in FOOD + energy !
They used to be available in larger face amounts,
but if you go to treasurydirect.gov as suggested above,
you will see this option and can decide if $5k/year investment
is too small to bother (used to be $30k/year). Advantage
is you get inflation protection without wild swings in price nor
phantom income, like TIPS. If you must go with TIPS, buy in tax advantaged account to deal with the phantom income.