Coffee Wars: McDonald's vs. Starbucks 21 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
It appears McDonald's Corp. (MCD) has pulled ahead of Starbucks Corp. (SBUX) in the cutthroat U.S. coffee war by offering similar "luxury" products at a 20% discount, attractive to consumers looking for places to save.
Recent price checks by Deutsche Bank show the Golden Arches sells a medium iced mocha for $2.89, compared with $3.65 at Starbucks.
In Canada, McDonald's tried to put a dent in Tim Hortons' (THI) market share by offering free coffee in the morning for two weeks back in April.
The bank said in a consumer report Thursday:
Call it a crazy guess, but we think the ability to get this good-tasting product at close to 11,000 outlets, many of them with drive-thru, is having negative impact.
Buying a drink that is close to $4 once a week works out to some $200 a year, not exactly "chump change" in a recession. Buying McDonald's instead saves about $40 a year. That's worth at least a few Big Macs.
There are risks to the McDonald's gambit, including diluting pricing for the entire market over the long term.
In any case, the short-term benefits of the aggressive McDonald's campaign has Deutsche Bank giving the company a Buy rating with a target price of $65, and a prediction of same-store sales to go up 4% in the second quarter.
Starbucks, on the other hand, remains bearish in the bank's eyes.
The note said:
Although we note the company's progress recognizing the need to reduce the store base and improve value for consumers, we continue to believe measures taken are not enough to contain erosion of comps or meet impending competitive pressure from McDonald's.
The company gets a Sell rating with a target price of $9.
There is also a much more practical perspective on the whole coffee war: does anybody actually need to buy a premium drink, even at a discount?
The note said:
If you do not drink coffee (at Starbucks), what will happen? Nothing. We compare this to what happens when one goes without food basics like water and bread needed to live. There’s a value gap there too.
No kidding.
Related Articles
|























Remember when competition was supposed to drive down prices for everyone? That was supposed to be the benefit of capitalism. Now, the strategy of undercutting competition by lowering price is considered risky because it might dilute pricing generally. That is one of the things this financial crash is all about. There has been a conspiracy to INFLATE prices for years now. Price dilution will actually defalte the bubble and allow us to start over again, after 18 years of maximum price inflation that has left us all in debt with a weaker currency.
Lower prices are the ANSWER to our dilemma.
And if I'm out, the 69 cent cup at McDonalds will do.
On Jul 20 08:50 AM John Bowman wrote:
> I never had a cup of coffee at Starbucks and never will. I will brew
> mine at home for a nickel or a dime per cup, thank you.
>
> And if I'm out, the 69 cent cup at McDonalds will do.
Dunkin Donuts Coffee (16 oz.) - 143mg at a price of $1.95 plus tax
MCD Large Coffee (16 oz.) - 145mg at a price of ~$2.00 plus tax
SBUX Grande Pike Roast (16 oz.) - 330mg at a price of $1.97 plus tax
I'm not really one to drink coffee for its aroma, taste, etc. Whatever wakes up the most in the morning does just fine. Now as seen above, with so much caffeine jacked into its coffee, Starbucks is the clear economical choice with over double the drug (it is - let's not kid ourselves) content. And surprise to those who have not walked into a Starbucks recently, but cheap options exist. The other exquisite latte stuff? Probably incorporating a high premium for the "ambience" you get from the shop.
I'd only get McD's because my thermal bottle ran dry. We as Americans fall for ridiculously expensive marketing and products that are of average quality.
I've always liked McDonald's coffee much more. It's basic..no frills. Unfortunately now McDonald's is trying to be like Starbucks with all the gourmet coffee choices. (Meanwhile none of them taste great). Surprisingly the one with the superb tasting iced coffee is....(wait for it).....Burger King. LOL
On Jul 20 11:09 AM Jeff B. wrote:
> McD's & DD coffee is cheap beans made into weak coffee. I have
> tried McD's "premium" coffee drinks. They are horrible. Tastes like
> all sugar & corn syrup added to cheap coffee & artifical
> whipped cream. It's so "in" now to dump on Starbucks, but any discerning
> coffee drinker will tell you that they still have the best coffee
> of all the major chain restaurants. Yes, the "experience" is good
> (an alternative to bars), but people also go for the coffee. The
> "experience" at McD's is just awful & their products cheap processed
> crap. Vote with your dollars, friends.
I completely disagree with all your analysis of the $4 coffee. It is about taste. It is not about experience (or just a little). Why on earth would anyone pay $4 for a latte? It is a well packed espresso with fresh crema on top. Properly foamed milk that picks up the oils from the fresh roasted beans. And the smell. Women that don't like to over eat can have a liquid that is satisfying and doesn't make your stuffed stomach hang over your pants. Ten minutes with a delicious coffee and the rest of the afternoon is great.
When you automate the espresso process and have untrained kids in a hurry to slap out hot milk (with poor foam and no smell from the coffee) why on earth did I just pay $4 for that? And if Starbucks can push a button so can anyone. It becomes a drink for people who can't tell the difference and will eat any old junk food. Those people are hardly likely to discriminate on name and are likely to fall to price and convenience. Pile it up with whip cream (edible oil product) and sugar... who will notice?
This is why the independent coffee shops stay in business and won't be competing with McDonald's. Starbucks lost the core of its earning power when it switched to automated espresso machines. Now it's a race to the bottom of price.
Many US companies failed doing likewise. Prime example, among numerous others, was domestic automakers. They would offer a stripped down version hoping to attract the masses and alienated a more sophisticated and potentially reliable customer base. Not so with BMW, Benz, etc. along with Toyota and Honda. The latter two knew enough to set up separate entities; namely, Lexus and Acura.
The economy is clearly hurting starbucks because there is less demand for premium coffees but i suspect Mcdonalds will have less long term impact on Starbucks that is being feared.
In fact, it may benefit Starbucks long term if Mcdonalds can expand the premium market to those who normally don't buy premium coffee, ie blue collar types. Its like introducing cheap drugs to get people hooked to later buy expensive drugs, I know bad analogy, but something that popped into my thoughts..