Conference Board Indicators: Recession Likely Over, Recovery Has Begun 10 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Since early June we've been observing more and more markers that a US economic recovery has started. Monday brought even more data to support that assertion.
A close look at the elements of Monday's Conference Board report supports the view that the recession ended in June and recovery has indeed begun. The CB's leading index posted a third month of consecutive gains rising 0.7 percent in June. Again the gain was much stronger than most economists had expected.
With reporting of the June data, several recession-ending items within the CB’s report are now in place. Most economists agree that these data need to be in place before a recession is officially considered over...
1. Three straight gains in the ratio of coincident-to-lagging indicators, (check)
2. Three months of 50-plus readings in the diffusion index, (check)
3. Three consecutive gains in the leading index along with an annualized reading over that period in excess of 10 percent. (The data shows a 12.8% annual rate -- the best since Jan 2002) (check)
The three check boxes follow last week's Economic Cycle Research Institute (ECRI) Weekly Leading Index which surged to an annualized five-year high of 7.0%.
This is just more data to support the claim that when NBER's cycle-dating committee finally marks the official 2008-2009 recession end, it will point to June 2009.
You may recall a professor from Kansas make that recession-ending prediction back in November 2008.
Given the strength of the current ECRI growth indications and the CB's LEI trends, those predicting a lackluster Q3 of growth are likely to be significantly surprised.
Related Articles
|





















"Accommodative policies will likely be warranted for an extended period," Bernanke wrote in the article published on the Wall Street Journal's web site. "At some point, however, as economic recovery takes hold, we will need to tighten monetary policy to prevent the emergence of an inflation problem down the road."
Werner said its fleet size fell by 10 percent during the period, and said it does not expect to cut its fleet further, though remains doubtful the industry will improve in the near term."
www.google.com/hostedn...
Interesting. So if the economy is expanding right now, who, other than CSX, is hauling the wholesale supplies and finished products associated with rising economic output?
It sure does FEELl like everything is getting better...
(Sarcastic voice off)
Bad news: It will be 1% growth for decades. And at 1% growth, much of the S&P doesn't generate enough cash to pay it's debts...
@Jordan,
Have a closer look at Ben's words: "...monetary policy remains focused on fostering economic recovery." He did *not* say "halting contraction."
Indeed growth has resumed.
He continued, "We will be looking to see more evidence of a sustained recovery that will begin to close the output gap, (and) begin to improve labor markets."
That appropriate policy stance will lead to a quite healthy uptick in Q3/Q4.
Bernanke is proud of the work done so far. And he should be.
GNE
The GDP itself may expand in the 3rd Qtr, it would simply be because of the math in the way GDP is computed - low inflation (or even deflation) expands the GDP (rather than deflate it by the inflation factor), reduced imports add to the GDP. We have low inflation (actually deflation) right now, imports are falling fast (net reduction in deficits) - all this is economic contraction. Govt. is spending money that adds to GDP - but we know this spending is short term and non sustainable.
Can positive turn in the leading indicator be taken as an absolute indicator of economic recovery/growth? If so, can you please explain.
I've heard many proclamations about the economy based on the interpretations of indicators. But many professionals also know that a turn in the indicator can be interpreted as a reversal or simply a brief correction. Please explain why you are so strong in your belief that this turn is the real mccoy.
How can anyone respond to a flabbergasting statement like that? I literally got a brain freeze as I read it.
Some people think the stock market's rise means economic recovery. Rather it is a proxy for long term bond risk adversion along with commodities and latent inflationary concerns. If the dollar rises sharply on a commodities retracement the market could easily reverse course as well.