Seeking Alpha
About this author: By this author:

It is a worst case scenario, but Neil Barofsky, the inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, has said the bailouts, bank rescues and other economic lifelines could end up costing the federal government as much as $23.7 Trillion. To put this number into perspective, it is nearly double the nation’s entire economic output for a year, more than the cost of all the wars the United States has ever fought combined and the most the federal government has spent on any single effort in American history. It is about $80,000 for every U.S. citizen.

Printing and borrowing $800 billion to hand over to the banks with no strings attached never seemed like a good idea. We wrote about it back in October of 2008 in this article. And despite some 80% of Americans being against the bailouts, our elected officials decided to hand over taxpayer money to their banker buddies anyway.


A soon-to-be released report by special inspector general Neil Barofsky finds:

Many of the banks that got federal aid to support increased lending have instead used some of the money to make investments, repay debts or buy other banks. It is not clear whether the report will also disclose the banks’ use of the bailout money to pay executives fat bonuses which they used to buy gold toilets and prostitutes, and to lobby Congress to stop any meaningful reform.”

It is infuriating and does not bode well for the U.S. dollar or our economic future. There is a point on the horizon when foreign governments and banks are going to stop buying our debt and holding our dollars. First we had news that the 2009 deficit had already topped $1 Trillion for the first time in history. As if that wasn’t bad enough, the sticker shock from this latest estimate is really going to upset some of our Eastern trading partners.

A figure like $24 Trillion just might be the breaking point for an already furious Chinese administration that has thus far been willing to support the dollar and our government’s spending binge for fear of losing American consumer demand. The tipping point comes when it is no longer worthwhile for China, Japan and others to continue financing America and propping up our sick economy. While I used to believe that point was still a few years away, it now seems to be rushing upon us full throttle.

This of course is going to lead to a massive sell off in the dollar and fireworks for precious metals. If you aren’t already invested in gold and silver, this is likely your last chance to buy gold for under $1,000 and trade in those paper promises for something of real tangible value that cannot be printed out of thin air. When the dollar collapse begins, I expect the drop to be fast and furious. Savvy investors will want to be positioned well before the bottom falls out.

Print this article with comments

This article has 47 comments:

  •  
    zerohedge.blogspot.com...

    The $23.7 Trillion Backstop Heist




    "dear taxpayer, (you) are being robbed by the Too Big To Fails and the Reserve Banking System. Much more info contained in this report, which attempts to grasp just how pervasive the involuntary taxpayer support of Wall Street is, including a great overview of the Federal Reserve Banking System

    look for a 1 to 3.9 reverse "split" on the dollar.
    Stocks and real estate are the safe haven.
    Tell the transfer agent/ registrar you want physical possession of the stock certificate
    Jul 21 01:35 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    No question, long term GOLD is soaring. All commodity based currencies (USD & AUD) and commodities too.

    I am buying all pullbacks for years to come.
    Jul 21 01:35 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Socialism for the rich is alive and well in America.
    Jul 21 01:46 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The cartoon says it all.

    It's not fair though to lump in all rich people with rich Wall Street people.

    Most wealthy people have not benefitted from the bailouts and will be expected to pay the lions share of the bill when this bank job is over.
    Jul 21 02:39 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The only thing this cartoon needs is a shark called healthcare swiming amongst them.
    Jul 21 03:03 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    This Neil Barofsky must be a gold bug. No one else could actually admit this, even though it stared them in the face for years. To the Green Shoots crowd though, it's just more fertilizer.
    Jul 21 03:24 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    There is a emminent collaspe coming, it is the only thing that can reset this unsurmountable debt load. It cant be paid back, it is increasing daily and will drown us all in time.

    I dont know what the answers are, I'm not sure if anyone does. Its like trying to turn the Titanic before it hits an iceburg when you know you dont have enough room.

    Its almost like they know that its fruitless to resist the debt bubble its unsurmountable so lets go out with a blast.

    Nothing is making common sense anymore.
    Jul 21 03:26 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Good observation. I think it's this way with every bankruptcy. Everyone rushes about in denial looking for another dollar or two...until the phone call and knock at the door.

    "We're from the IMF and we're here to help".


    On Jul 21 03:26 PM conceptwizard wrote:

    > There is a emminent collaspe coming, it is the only thing that can
    > reset this unsurmountable debt load. It cant be paid back, it is
    > increasing daily and will drown us all in time.
    >
    > I dont know what the answers are, I'm not sure if anyone does. Its
    > like trying to turn the Titanic before it hits an iceburg when you
    > know you dont have enough room.
    >
    > Its almost like they know that its fruitless to resist the debt bubble
    > its unsurmountable so lets go out with a blast.
    >
    > Nothing is making common sense anymore.
    Jul 21 04:58 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    80% against? Almost as if you don't really have a representative democracy. But there will be hell to pay on election day...where 99% of incumbents will get re-elected.
    Jul 21 06:25 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    So buy gold,right?
    Jul 21 08:25 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    So, out of the 24 trillion you talk about in the article, you account for 750 billion. The 24 trillion seems like a stretch when you can only account for such a small portion. What about the other 23.25 trillion? Where did that go?
    Jul 21 09:26 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I think instead of gold, the Chinese will aim for commodities with more utility. Why buy gold when the only thing it anchors are sick economies?

    I'd aim for others (especially oil and aluminum, note CNOOC and Chalco), and keep in mind that SILVER is what dominated the Chinese mindset for centuries, not gold.
    Jul 21 11:22 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "imminent" and "insurmountable" look them up.


    On Jul 21 03:26 PM conceptwizard wrote:

    > There is a emminent collaspe coming, it is the only thing that can
    > reset this unsurmountable debt load. It cant be paid back, it is
    > increasing daily and will drown us all in time.
    >
    > I dont know what the answers are, I'm not sure if anyone does. Its
    > like trying to turn the Titanic before it hits an iceburg when you
    > know you dont have enough room.
    >
    > Its almost like they know that its fruitless to resist the debt bubble
    > its unsurmountable so lets go out with a blast.
    >
    > Nothing is making common sense anymore.
    Jul 22 11:12 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The american public are a society of dumbed down fluoride heads. The are, for the most part, unable to synthesize information and analyze it critically. They leave it to controlled mass media to do the thinking for them. They are headed for Obamageddon and deserve the government they have since they are doing nothing to change it.
    Jul 22 03:01 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I apoligize for my typos. I have a wireless key board and sometimes for whatever reason it does not register, and sometimes I just make a mistake. Thank you for pointing this out, I'll be more careful in the future.


    On Jul 22 11:12 AM WillTrade wrote:

    > "imminent" and "insurmountable" look them up.
    Jul 22 07:47 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    No need to apologize.... ;-) We all knew what you meant.
    Jul 22 10:23 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    $23.7 Trillion is not the planned cost of the bailout (which is probably less than $.3 Trillion); it is not the sum of government loans that have been given out (which is $3 Trillion); it is the sum total of all loan guarantees the Federal Government has signed on to guarantee.

    While it seems like a lot, it's less than half the net worth of the US, and would only come into play if the asset values of the US were to fall by more than 50% and if inflation-unadjusted income were to fall by more than 50% such that these guarantees would be called on. This would be a major deflation, and should it occur would represent the greatest monetary failure- or the greatest central banker scam- in history.

    Given the inflationary goals of the Fed and likely voter response to a hyperdeflation, I don't see this happening anytime soon.

    BTW- what would be the value of a US dollar be without the US government "backstopping" its value by fighting counterfeiting, controlling the money supply, and providing for the common defense of a nation that can create goods and services purchasable with said dollars?
    Jul 23 12:55 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The commercial real estate market could be the last push that sends banks over the edge. I don't think that Citibank will have any equity left after the reality hits. It will be completely nationalized, as will Bank of America.

    A nationalized bank, supported by the printing press, can stick around for a long, long time.

    Also, before any investors out there start buying gold/silver, remember that commodities fell by 50% during the last crash, so you need to wait for the crash to play out a little before buying. If the dollar were to fall at the same time, which I don't think it would, then that would provide support to commodities. Without that contemporaneous calming condition, commodities would likely crash, again. In addition, the Treasury market is, unbelievably, still the safe haven even after all this and even after considering the epicenter.
    Jul 23 02:35 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    no matter what goes up in value, and no matter what a common investor buys, I am almost certain that this common investor will lose money and the buying power.
    Jul 23 04:01 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Why I would not normally mention Rich Dad on seekingalpha he is the doyenne of the retail investor and here he is on TV saying gold is going to $15,000 an ounce. People do tend to follow him and this is exactly how a retail gold boom would start, see:
    arabianmoney.net/2009/.../
    Jul 23 07:21 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Dillinger looks like a good guy, compared to the FED and Wall Street.
    Break out the Tommy guns!
    Jul 23 08:23 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    What sad is that people actually listen to Kiyosaki, so yes, it could be the start of a retail boom.

    As farf as the $24T, that'd require every piece of debt guaranteed by the government to default and the principal payments required. That is a foolish idea.
    Jul 23 10:32 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Interesting but everyone in the market is making money hand over fist. But most investors are negative. You can lead a fool to water but you cant make him drink.

    Of course the biggest fool is one in the white house.
    Jul 23 12:50 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    you have no knowledge of bank accounting..do you know what loan
    loss reserves,non performing loans and net chargeoffs mean???
    Also do you know the concept of CLTV???


    On Jul 23 02:35 AM MarkitWacha wrote:

    > The commercial real estate market could be the last push that sends
    > banks over the edge. I don't think that Citibank will have any equity
    > left after the reality hits. It will be completely nationalized,
    > as will Bank of America.
    >
    > A nationalized bank, supported by the printing press, can stick around
    > for a long, long time.
    >
    > Also, before any investors out there start buying gold/silver, remember
    > that commodities fell by 50% during the last crash, so you need to
    > wait for the crash to play out a little before buying. If the dollar
    > were to fall at the same time, which I don't think it would, then
    > that would provide support to commodities. Without that contemporaneous
    > calming condition, commodities would likely crash, again. In addition,
    > the Treasury market is, unbelievably, still the safe haven even after
    > all this and even after considering the epicenter.
    Jul 23 01:50 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Gold is fine, but Silver Is Divine. With its many uses, and with the current market (pressures) distorting it to the low side, it has more upside potential than gold IMO. Oh I have gold, bullion, miners etc, but increasingly more silver.
    Jul 23 02:10 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    He's talking about the implicit obligation that the government is taking on backing Freddie, Fannie, Social Security, Medicare, Government pensions, Deposit Insurance, ect. Plus the current outstanding debt.


    On Jul 21 09:26 PM tradertom wrote:

    > So, out of the 24 trillion you talk about in the article, you account
    > for 750 billion. The 24 trillion seems like a stretch when you can
    > only account for such a small portion. What about the other 23.25
    > trillion? Where did that go?
    Jul 23 04:00 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    In 2006, I had a U.S. Congressman tell me, face to face, that, because of the U.S. Governments use of Cash Basis Accounting, if the truth be known, the U.S. Government debt was, at that time, just over 54 TRILLION DOLLARS!

    No typo here, he said "54 TRILLION DOLLARS!" I can only imagine what it is now.
    Jul 23 06:31 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    A massive devaluation of the US$ is probable with concommitant competitive devaluations thus sending price inflation to unprecedented levels globally. That is the medicine. The disease is inflation spawned by deflation and the cause is hoarding by banksters and the terra incognita of fast and cheap money back-channelled through direct government monetarist interventions. The stock market rally is a symptom of the problem and a tipping point that the problem persists. The price of gold bullion, a small market dwarfed by the general market, is thwarted by paper issues for which there is probably insufficient physical gold to cover. Still, when the stock market tanks, which it must, (it may even be planned) much gold and other liquid assets will be thrown over in a mad rush to deleverage and cover. It is then that the realization will come to the financially savvy, that physical gold's liquidity is more important than its SPOT price. That SPOT price could be extremely high. But that value (of the metal) will not be obvious immediately during the rush to cover. It will only become obvious after it all shakes down and people get up off the floor, dust themselves off and realize how much pre-hyperinflationary or devaluation FIAT was spent on < US$1000. per ounce gold bullion by entities with strange names. Many of those names will be on the rolls of very old, arcane European cliques through their private Ticino banks. The "end" always precedes a beginning. That is an Historical fact. We are approaching the event horizon. Information is fuzzy and/or is kept in a prison. Everyone here at SA knows or suspects this but drifting through ambiguity is no way to go through life. My bet is on physical gold because my "best" information supports that conclusion.
    Jul 23 07:31 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    good point- the Chinese, in fact, have been loading up on copper! follow the smart money.


    On Jul 21 11:22 PM Ricard wrote:

    > I think instead of gold, the Chinese will aim for commodities with
    > more utility. Why buy gold when the only thing it anchors are sick
    > economies?
    >
    > I'd aim for others (especially oil and aluminum, note CNOOC and Chalco),
    > and keep in mind that SILVER is what dominated the Chinese mindset
    > for centuries, not gold.
    Jul 23 08:26 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I love how they keep talking about accounting tricks and "writing off" the debt or "writing it down". LOL.

    Hocus pocus magicus Bernankes, Timothy Piffany, Paulsonian Poof!

    All gone.

    Problem is that jobs go away, homes are foreclosed and left empty to have the copper ripped out and trashed by squatters, commercial real estate collapses, and States can't pay their bills.

    Then the welfare and WIC dries up. Unemployment goes up. People are restless, scared, and hungry/cold/hot and don't have the usual comforts. Riots start.

    Suddenly, the zeros or numbers you toyed with on the spreadsheet or that people thought were there don't have any meaning. You can fling a cow pie like a frisbee but it's still B.S.

    The powers that be, by delaying a collapse at the source of the speculation and corruption, have pushed it down to the average citizen. Sooner or later that collapse will manifest itself physically.
    Jul 24 01:49 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    i've listened and acted upon Gold Bug Fever and lost a chunk of change. No More. Inflation will come (but when?) and like it or not, gold's main utility is for Jewelry, not currency. I have the GLD prospectus and it says the same thing. Ag. commodities, energy, copper, mat'ls in general are more likely to have a market than gold. Gold as a 'hedge' maybe but don't expect much earnings from it in the near future.... maybe long term, but still it's a 'luxury' not a necessity.
    Jul 24 07:34 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    There is a presentation on slideshare you can find at gold2hold.com, that visually shows a person what $1 Trillion looks like, how rampant fiat money creation leads to inflation, and how gold historically reacts to inflation. Now multiply the visual on $1 Trillion to our pending debt! Gold will be the ultimate hedge to inflation.
    Jul 24 08:17 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The American people got what they wanted last November.....irrational spending in the government.

    So now, we must all pay the price for this...in an ever smothering tax burden that forces the consumer to save just to pay the government!!

    Well, at least our spending will grow something.....
    Jul 24 09:11 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Such a high worst-case figure - larger than all of the wars that made the U.S. the world's preeminent power - is a fitting metaphor for the end of our status as the leading power. We're too big for IMF receivership, so maybe China will just make it easy by demanding Uncle Sam hand over Americans' IRA assets.
    Jul 24 09:22 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    He also recommended buying silver in the spring of 08 when it was over $20 an ounce. Kiyosaki is a clown and not to be taken seriously.


    On Jul 23 07:21 AM Peter Cooper wrote:

    > Why I would not normally mention Rich Dad on seekingalpha he is the
    > doyenne of the retail investor and here he is on TV saying gold is
    > going to $15,000 an ounce. People do tend to follow him and this
    > is exactly how a retail gold boom would start, see:
    > arabianmoney.net/2009/.../
    Jul 24 12:31 PM | Link | Reply
  •  

    Woo-hoo! All aboard the Tinfoil Hat Express. "arcane European cliques" with their "Ticino banks" (ah yes, that World Financial Center, Ticino)..."inflation spawned by deflation" (or is it deflation triggered by hyperinflation? I forget), "information kept in prison" (with manacles????)

    All aboooooaaardd!

    On Jul 23 07:31 PM AuGod! wrote:

    > A massive devaluation of the US$ is probable with concommitant competitive
    > devaluations thus sending price inflation to unprecedented levels
    > globally. That is the medicine. The disease is inflation spawned
    > by deflation and the cause is hoarding by banksters and the terra
    > incognita of fast and cheap money back-channelled through direct
    > government monetarist interventions. The stock market rally is a
    > symptom of the problem and a tipping point that the problem persists.
    > The price of gold bullion, a small market dwarfed by the general
    > market, is thwarted by paper issues for which there is probably insufficient
    > physical gold to cover. Still, when the stock market tanks, which
    > it must, (it may even be planned) much gold and other liquid assets
    > will be thrown over in a mad rush to deleverage and cover. It is
    > then that the realization will come to the financially savvy, that
    > physical gold's liquidity is more important than its SPOT price.
    > That SPOT price could be extremely high. But that value (of the metal)
    > will not be obvious immediately during the rush to cover. It will
    > only become obvious after it all shakes down and people get up off
    > the floor, dust themselves off and realize how much pre-hyperinflationary
    > or devaluation FIAT was spent on < US$1000. per ounce gold bullion
    > by entities with strange names. Many of those names will be on the
    > rolls of very old, arcane European cliques through their private
    > Ticino banks. The "end" always precedes a beginning. That is an Historical
    > fact. We are approaching the event horizon. Information is fuzzy
    > and/or is kept in a prison. Everyone here at SA knows or suspects
    > this but drifting through ambiguity is no way to go through life.
    > My bet is on physical gold because my "best" information supports
    > that conclusion.
    Jul 24 12:34 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Those green pieces of paper look good right now, with unemployment high, excess capacity and price wars in many retail segments. But over time those green pieces of paper are multiplying far faster than the underlying economy which supports their value, and, the debt is increasing.

    People in other parts of the world have already started to question the value and safety of our green pieces of paper, and are only willing to exchange fewer and fewer of their own pieces of paper for our paper.

    Gold, silver and platinum have no such issues.
    Jul 24 02:02 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Your last paragraph is the key to the whole thing. Those are all legitimate functions of government as spelled out in the Constitution.
    Bailing out failed car companies, providing health care to every citizen and regulating the crap out of every business in the country are NOT functions of government.
    When we get back to basics and a smaller government, we'll have a stronger dollar.


    On Jul 23 12:55 AM Dirk McCoy wrote:

    > $23.7 Trillion is not the planned cost of the bailout (which is probably
    > less than $.3 Trillion); it is not the sum of government loans that
    > have been given out (which is $3 Trillion); it is the sum total of
    > all loan guarantees the Federal Government has signed on to guarantee.
    >
    >
    > While it seems like a lot, it's less than half the net worth of the
    > US, and would only come into play if the asset values of the US were
    > to fall by more than 50% and if inflation-unadjusted income were
    > to fall by more than 50% such that these guarantees would be called
    > on. This would be a major deflation, and should it occur would represent
    > the greatest monetary failure- or the greatest central banker scam-
    > in history.
    >
    > Given the inflationary goals of the Fed and likely voter response
    > to a hyperdeflation, I don't see this happening anytime soon.
    >
    > BTW- what would be the value of a US dollar be without the US government
    > "backstopping" its value by fighting counterfeiting, controlling
    > the money supply, and providing for the common defense of a nation
    > that can create goods and services purchasable with said dollars?
    Jul 24 02:27 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Gold's main utility is jewelry??

    Is that why, worldwide, central banks hold tens of thousands of tons??? They're all jewelry manufacturers?? I think not.

    It's a store of value.


    On Jul 24 07:34 AM datadave wrote:

    > i've listened and acted upon Gold Bug Fever and lost a chunk of change.
    > No More. Inflation will come (but when?) and like it or not, gold's
    > main utility is for Jewelry, not currency. I have the GLD prospectus
    > and it says the same thing. Ag. commodities, energy, copper, mat'ls
    > in general are more likely to have a market than gold. Gold as a
    > 'hedge' maybe but don't expect much earnings from it in the near
    > future.... maybe long term, but still it's a 'luxury' not a necessity.
    Jul 24 02:32 PM | Link | Reply
  •  

    I seldom do, but will reply, in this instance to poster Anandakos.

    Anandakos, thank you for your critique and insight.

    Your question: "... information kept in prison" (with manacles????)" I used the terms "imprisoned" with the term "event horizon" because as we all know from elementary level physics, proximity to a black hole results in less and less escaping until light itself is trapped. I perhaps too quickly, applied that parallel to our current need (and lack) of verifiable information.

    As to your remarks about Tinfoil Hat Express, I apologize and ask forgiveness. If I may, Ticino is Switzerland's third largest financial center after Zurich and Geneva. (According to Wiki the banking industry alone has 8,400 employees and generates 17% of the gross cantonal product.) But again, I was alluding, albeit awkwardly to Italy and the Ticino's shared language, culture and very close ties in respect to the financial industry. Why? As you and all will know Italy’s financial police (Guardia italiana di Finanza) seized US bonds worth US 134.5 billion from two Japanese nationals at Chiasso (40 km from Milan) on the border between Italy and Switzerland's Ticino Canton. It was an oblique reference and for that I express my sincere regrets.

    Regarding your remarks vis "inflation spawned by deflation" (or is it deflation triggered by hyperinflation? I forget)", <close quote> - I would say only that if the excess US$ deployed to lubricate the liquidity spigot are not drawn from the system in a timely manner, price inflation will follow. That happens when too many dollars are chasing too few products. Yes, much wealth went to money heaven, but again, we can't quantify with the precision necessary to be comfortable with government assurances that there will not be inflation because the Government doesn't know either.

    In any case, your remarks are not focused on my central message which I will simplify. Namely, to expect a decrease in US$ buying power (sort of like the 45% debasement since 2000). To plan (and prepare) for a new round of general market volatility downwards. Expect the same vis gold bullion initially, as many sell the metal, to cover other losses. Then expect gold to pop thus reflecting what some Tinfoil's know now and many rich European folks have known for centuries. Gold is a very liquid asset that comes with no counterparty liability.

    I regret that I cannot match wits with you or your high prose Anandakos. I am a simple man who hates ambiguity and seeks Alpha when it comes to my hard earned and too easily debased cash.
    Jul 24 03:11 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Many decades ago in business school we had the same discussion - what happens if offshore buyers stopped buying our debt? I recall asking - what if we call it preferred stock instead of debt?
    Jul 24 04:02 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    You might have a stash of gold or silver that even the Egyptians would be proud of but there is folks out there that are stashing what I believe might be the most precious metal of all. LEAD! Backed up with a small amount of powder and sent down a 20 inch barrel and there goes your stash in a flash.
    Jul 24 04:38 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Cayrick, when you say the American people are "dumbed-down fluoride heads," I agree with you. But you call them "they"--What nation are you a citizen of?
    Jul 24 05:45 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    So gold is a store of value. Cyclically it's up and down, but it seems to average out to keep up with inflation (an ounce of gold can always buy a tailored men's suit, and all that). But it generates no income. Merely holding value doesn't seem so great. Why not invest in vehicles that not only hold value but also pay income? Ideas: I-bonds; utility company shares; REITs . . .
    Jul 24 05:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Yes, gold is a good 'crisis' hedge. But for inflation caused by budget deficits and money-printing, I prefer to diversify into some of the industrial commodities and soft commodities (in addition to holding gold).

    As long as the financial system stays intact, you have supply-demand fundamentals working in your favor for many of the industrials.

    www.planbeconomics.com.../
    Jul 25 02:16 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    For all the critics of this, forget the 24 Trillion. Try $50+ trillion in unfunded obligations going forward as well. The solution, cut spending and raise taxes. But democracies can't do this consistently. So the game will continue until a catastrophic collapse is unleashed. The USD will collapse and the bond market will collapse, ushering in unprecedented social dislocation in the USA (and globally). Quite frankly, those that can't see this are living in fantasy land. A social catastrophe is unfolding.
    Jul 25 12:15 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    ..."For most of us, gold is only valuable if we possess it in large-sized pieces. However, the "bigger is better" rule isn't the case for those interested in exploiting gold's exceptional ability to catalyze a wide variety of chemical reactions, including the oxidation of poisonous carbon monoxide (CO) into harmless carbon dioxide at room temperatures. That process, if industrialized, could potentially improve the effectiveness of catalytic converters that clean automobile exhaust and breathing devices that protect miners and firefighters./td/tr/tb... For this purpose, nanoclusters—gold atoms bound together in crystals smaller than a strand of DNA—are the size most treasured."...Sept. 5, 2008 issue of Science

    Could be that Ag isn't the only "precious metal" destined for "industrial" use.

    Disclosure: deeded mineral rights, CA motherlode, 165Koz high grade reserves, <300' subsurface.


    On Jul 23 02:10 PM Boot wrote:

    > Gold is fine, but Silver Is Divine. With its many uses, and with
    > the current market (pressures) distorting it to the low side, it
    > has more upside potential than gold IMO. Oh I have gold, bullion,
    > miners etc, but increasingly more silver.
    Jul 26 07:10 PM | Link | Reply