Friday Roundup: Commodities, Emerging Markets 28 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
<< Return to Page 1: Have They No Shame?
You have to grit your teeth and move forward sometimes given the nonsense, unethical behavior at the highest level and the lying taking place every day. It’s hard to deal with as a human being and remain disciplined. Succeeding in doing this is where the rubber meets the road.
That wraps up a fun week. We didn’t have as much fun as others given light positions but the month’s not over and neither is the year.
Enjoy your weekend.
Disclosure: Among other issues the ETF Digest maintains positions in: QQQQ, SMH, EFA, EEM, EWY and FXI.
The charts and comments are only the author’s view of market activity and aren’t recommendations to buy or sell any security. Market sectors and related ETFs are selected based on his opinion as to their importance in providing the viewer a comprehensive summary of market conditions for the featured period. Chart annotations aren’t predictive of any future market action rather they only demonstrate the author’s opinion as to a range of possibilities going forward.
Related Articles
|























On Jul 25 12:07 PM RiskReturnOptimizer wrote:
> Watch relative performance of QQQQ vs. XLV ... this will determine
> when the rally in SPY will be over ... any significant sector rotation
> away from Tech into Health Care will likely signal end of rally in
> SPY.
Just what news do you expect? Good news is NOT a catalyst for this market rally...havent you figured out what the catalyst really was yet?
Rest assured at Dow 10,000 or mayeb a bit higher or lower, GS and the other criminals will use higher unemployment, less consumer spending, continued residential foreclosures and a huge bust in commercial real estate as their rationale to go short and downgrade stocks...
Great article, David.....we all know the deck is stacked and always has been, but now that the government is involved, it adds a dimension of randomness that cannot be accounted for with traditional research and analysis. The New York Fed has created a council of insiders including the Soros, Credit Suisse, PIMCO, U.S. Steel, and even a Carnegie? First question that pops in my mind?..Are these insiders influencing policy, making policy, or dictating terms? PIMCO already stepped away from the government in one situation where there was some question about the government reneging on agreements made in the Chrysler and GM Bailouts. So, now El-Erian is in the wheelhouse again looking for guarantees that only PIMCO can get? (Thank god I have 17% of my money with PIMCO is all I can say). But the real issue here is that there is not even an attempt at discretion. The Gangsta government (See the Minnesota Representative call Barney Frank a crook on YouTube) is working feverishly behind closed doors to influence markets, the economy, public opinion, and financing. I remember not long ago when the important thing was to determine if the CEO was cooking the books or fudging his numbers. Nowadays, I am sure all the books are being cooked, but I have no idea how many chefs are in the kitchen and whether they want that stock to go up or down. In effect, I have become a Macro investor; security analysis is less important now.
For Traders and investors like myself who trade infrequently but still move my money around as conditions dictate, the deck is certainly stacked. Am I the only one at the poker table who doesn't know who the mark is? Is Goldman making millions of trades per day just to make half a penny per transaction? Is there no volume, or some, or a lot? Where's the SEC regulators? Where's the Treasury Dept.? Where are the watchdogs? Why are we still allowing derivatives to be created, unregulated?
The only thing I can do is try to put myself in Paulson's or Geithner's shoes and try to see through their eyes, but I don't fit very well in their clothes and when I am done walking in their shoes for a few moments, I feel a powerful need for a shower.
"Rainbow's End: The Crash of 1929 (Pivotal Moments in American History)" by Maury Klein
On Jul 26 01:11 PM Alphameister wrote:
> An awful lot of whiners continue fighting the tape and the Fed.
> All of you had an opportunity to buy GS well below the level at which
> the well-connected Buffet bought in. I'm guessing that none of you
> took advantage of that opportunity. While my fundamental stock
> analyses were not well rewarded last year, they have been very well
> rewarded in 2009. So bring on all those "thumbs down" ratings that
> a comment like this is guaranteed to produce; I can handle them.
On Jul 26 01:11 PM Alphameister wrote:
> An awful lot of whiners continue fighting the tape and the Fed.
> All of you had an opportunity to buy GS well below the level at which
> the well-connected Buffet bought in. I'm guessing that none of you
> took advantage of that opportunity. While my fundamental stock
> analyses were not well rewarded last year, they have been very well
> rewarded in 2009. So bring on all those "thumbs down" ratings that
> a comment like this is guaranteed to produce; I can handle them.
Thanks for mentioning Build America Bonds. These are one of the most curious inventions I have ever encountered, and in my work in the municipal sector, the main enthusiasm I see for these is from underwriters.
The "appeal" of BABs is that the bonds are issued at taxable interest rates (higher) than customary tax-exempt municipal bonds. The issuer commits to paying the taxable rate to the investor and receives a rebate from the IRS to offset the difference in interest costs.
The trouble is that the issuer is counting on the Federal government to stand by the program as long as the bonds are outstanding. The weirdest feature of these bonds that I have encontered, however, is that the rebate is subject to an annual appropriation that Congress can withdraw at any time. Thus, every issuer of BABs runs the very real risk of skyrocketing debt service costs down the road, long after the underwriters have collected their fees. Investors, of course, run the risk of losing in a municipal bankruptcy. And taxpayers get hit either way - funding the rebates or losing out on municipal services when local budgets get slashed.
These bonds are bad news, and I would advise everyone to steer clear of them and be very careful about any entity involved with them.
But, market indicators and oscillators are subsidiary to the trend and not meant to be used to bet against the trend....and right now there is no indication the trend has changed, still setting higher highs and higher lows. So, the reader will be right eventually...but not just yet.
I think the play right now is to close ones eyes/hold ones nose and keep buying the dips till Dow 10,000 and S&P 1000/1500. For those who are skeptical perhaps to do this with put protection.
I am slightly short at the moment and suffering a little bit. Will unwind earlier of any correction of 2 or 4% or one week. I own puts so can go long against it. Waiting till September/October and those numbers on the Dow/S&P for the market to break trend and go lower.
In the meantime, I think Amazon is a potential short given the island reversal on Thursday/Friday. I think gold and silver are in a countertrend rally and should turn over in the near term.
I am also watching China very closely and if it starts to roll over, everything else should follow with varying time lags. I would give more credence to a definitive Chinese stock breakdown and use oscillators carefully. While a negative divergence in overbought area is a powerful and not so common indication, may be prudent to wait for a negative divergence, a bearish moving average crossover and a bearish center line cross over.
If we turn lower again, the downtrend will be fearsome as well. But, patience will be key. In bear markets, bulls lose money and bears lose money!
I agree with commenters that the machines have been hard at work trying to generate decent volume again. Too bad they keep falling short. I guess GS needs approval for stratospheric VaR even exceeding the SEC's allowance to do that. So if the FDIC won't approve GS to pay out massive capital to its executives and keep VaR high will that mean program trading will drop in half? If so, I hope the FDIC refuses their request.
"You made only 2000% in bonuses? I made 5000% in golden parachutes?"
On Jul 26 01:51 PM marco caricom wrote:
> You may have some good points.....but i'd be more comfortable investing
> in GS manager/banksters shares and parachutes than in GS itself.
>
On Jul 25 09:40 PM buyforeclosures wrote:
> Untrusting i couldn't have said it better myself...if u have a minute
> check my comments on the Oil topics ( Wtf/Brent) this whole Oil price
> increase and market rally is a sham and it was instigated at 14000
> when GS and others went short and then went long at 6500 and created
> a Bull market with Bullsh_ _ low estimates..and they wil lgo SHORT
> again and get even richer! That is a fact
On Jul 26 01:11 PM Alphameister wrote:
> An awful lot of whiners continue fighting the tape and the Fed. All
> of you had an opportunity to buy GS well below the level at which
> the well-connected Buffet bought in. I'm guessing that none of you
> took advantage of that opportunity. While my fundamental stock analyses
> were not well rewarded last year, they have been very well rewarded
> in 2009. So bring on all those "thumbs down" ratings that a comment
> like this is guaranteed to produce; I can handle them.