U.S. Housing Nearing Bottom, But Foreclosures Worrying 16 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
The 11% month-to-month rise in US new home sales in June reported yesterday grabbed the headlines, but some of the other indicators are more interesting.
A roundup of analyst opinion by the WSJ’s Real Time Economics blog finds a degree of consensus that the market is at or near a bottom. The fact that prices were down is in some sense good news as it brings affordability into better balance.
As important as the bump in sales is the reduction in inventories. As the WSJ reports, the
ratio of houses for sale to houses sold in June was 8.8. But inventories are shrinking. The ratio was 10.2 in May. At the end of June, there were an estimated 281,000 homes for sale. That’s below 293,000 for sale at the end of May.
Mark Zandi at Moody’s economy.com calculates that excess housing inventory declined from 1.9 million units at the beginning of 2008 to around 1.5 million during the current quarter and will taper off to a near normal level by the end of 2011. Excess inventory is the surplus of homes for sale or rent above a 4% vacancy rate.
Zandi further argues that housing is fairly valued or undervalued in many parts of the country including much of California and the Southwest:
He believes that starts have already bottomed and that prices will bottom in early 2010.
However, Zandi remains concerned about the impact of foreclosures, which are expected to keep rising as loan modification efforts so far have failed to have much impact.
Another ominous sign: Reuters reports that
rising unemployment continues to make more Americans late on their mortgage payments, a sign that the rate of US personal bankruptcies will keep going up, according to monthly data from the Equifax credit bureau.
Barry Ritholtz, at The Big Picture, meanwhile, argues that the monthly data is not statistically significant.
… WE DO NOT KNOW what the change was from last month, as the margin of error is greater than the reported data point.
He puts the June “increase” in perspective by noting that sales were down 21% from a year earlier.
In a similar vein, Floyd Norris of The New York Times notes that
In actual sales, the preliminary estimate is that 36,000 homes were sold, up 3,000 from May but down 9,000 from last June.
To put it another way, this was the second-worst June since they began counting new-home sales in 1963. It was not quite as bad as June 1982, when the country was mired in a deep recession and interest rates were sky high. Then 34,000 new homes were sold.
There are twice as many households in America as there were then, so relative to population this was the worst June ever, by far.
Related Articles
|

























This article has 16 comments:
Confiscatory taxation has to be abolished. Local governments have GOT to find different ways to fund themselves and SEVERELY limit their out of control spending, if they want folks to settle in their town and buy a home there. If this factor is not sufficiently addressed, we will witness rampant suburban decay like we used to see in the inner city.
I don't see housing turning around for a LONG time...not until the looming issue of big government and high taxation is solved in this country. The middle class simply can't afford middle-class life anymore -- and that includes home ownership.
I do not think there is bottom or even stability in sight – job losses and credit crunch are yet to play out.
It would be difficult for the reasonable person to ignore these factors, as it would be foolhardy for anyone to use this data to declare any sort of bottom to the housing price declines.
I have noticed there are very few bullish commentors left on SA. I ask everyone to lighten up on the bulls. We do need a little more of their enthusiasm/fantasy. I am starting to get depressed, theres hardly any one left to pick on.
;')
I guess there are a lot of the same people looking to get even more people stuck in real estate. That is the unfortunate effect of saving Countrywide and other bad banks. The simple fact is, usually the best time to buy a house if you want to speculate on property price appreciation is when there is high interest and you use cash. Interest rates are exactly opposite to that scenario if real estate brokers happen to actually care about their clients (they usually don't). I'd much rather get the upside to home prices when interest rates fall than buy on a bottom and fret over what happens to demand if long term lending rates rise even 1-2% or Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bite the dust for selling at rates that can't even cover defaults (except the Fed is now offering to buy some of these loans to put yet another cost on the taxpayer's tab).
Personally, you will know the housing market is fine when the government stops trying to create hairbrained schemes to artificially support it.
At zero percent interest, can anything be undervalued? Just what does it mean by "undervalued"?
The long-run rational Fed fund rate is around 5-6%. At 0%, everything is over-valued!
When people are fooled by the low interest payments for buying a house, how can it be undervalued?
As a rule of thumb, the fair price of a real estate property is roughly equal to the expected average net rental receipt divided by the average long-run interest rate.
When most people do not know the difference between the current artificially low interest rate and the long-run average interest rate, everything is over-valued, not undervalued!
It is easy for something to be overpriced because of the interest rate illusion. However, it is difficult for a real estate property to be underpriced, especially because no one can short-sell it! Without short-selling, speculators can only push up real estate prices; they can pull down real estate prices.
Now, Moody's map is saying that in many areas in the U.S., people'd rather pay significantly higher rents than their expected long-run monthly mortgage payments for owning a house? Ask yourself: is that possible?
Bear in mind that when most people are buying homes for their own living. Any potential capital gains and capital losses really do NOT matter in the long-run to these people! Therefore, they only care about their rents vs. their mortgage payments.
The failing health of the $6,700 billion commercial property market, which accounts for 10+% of the US GDP, could be a significant hurdle on the road to recovery.
And for what it's worth, economy.com is an independent unit of Moody's and not part of the ratings division.
On Jul 28 01:49 PM Bigman16 wrote:
> Are Moody's values based on the Median Home Price in the first exhibit?
> And what are they comparing that to - average household income?
"There are four items in place that are tricking people into calling a bottom, when in fact three of these items are temporary. The result is an artificial restriction of supply and artificial pumping of demand.
1) It’s the seasonally strongest buying season
2) There’s a foreclosure moratorium about to end
3) Federal tax credits offered for 1st time homebuyers
4) Historically low mortgage rates (this may or may not change soon)"
I think housing market has still to fall because America is loosing on Jobs and interest rates have gone higher.
Read More www.housingnewslive.co...
Lucrative Fees May Deter Efforts to Alter Loans
www.nytimes.com/2009/0...