Two Big Bounces: 1929 vs. 2009 13 comments
Submit
an article to
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
The following chart is a simple comparison between the big stock bounce that occurred in the wake of the Dow crash of 1929 and compares it to the bounce we are seeing today in the S&P 500 index.
The method of alignment was simple… take the first definitive up trading day off the bottom of the preceding bear market low and set that as the start of the series… then simply re-base both series to a value of 100 so they could be compared side-by-side.
Our current rally has a note of mania to it… It’s almost too good to be true…
I’m not saying it’s going to happen… Just keeping a watchful eye…
Related Articles
|






















Silver, Oil, and the Vix signals are confirming my thoughts that the market top was 892. I think we could have made it higher if it wasn't for the Commodities Futures trading rules BS...
Disclosure: Purchasing 170 SDS September 53 calls tomorrow at market open. Additional 300+ call purchase Friday after GDP report.
875 here we come again...
"State Street Index: Investor Confidence Surges to Five Year High"
Institutional Investors jumping in. Is this just another indicator that we are near the end of this big pop?
I have decided that it is and have been slowly selling things into this huge rally.
How can the economy come back to its former levels of economic activity with all this phoney credit expansion and debt no longer around?
Darned if I can locate it in my bookmarks, but it gives a longer time line than provided here, and eerily the series bounced at exactly the same point, before really taking the dive down to very low levels.
Seems like good advice!
However, I would have left out "almost".
www.businessinsider.co...
On Jul 29 08:27 AM Davewmart wrote:
> Anyone have a link to the two guys who have done loads of charts
> drawing out the parallels between 1929 and on and 2007 and on?<br/>Darned
> if I can locate it in my bookmarks, but it gives a longer time line
> than provided here, and eerily the series bounced at exactly the
> same point, before really taking the dive down to very low levels.
Thanks for the links. The latter did indeed lead me through to the article I was thinking of, by Eichengreen and O'Rourke:
www.voxeu.org/index.ph...