Seeking Alpha
Independent research, bonds, long/short equity, macro
Profile| Send Message|
( followers)  

Almost exactly like the 2010 movie "Unstoppable," which tells the story of a runaway freight train carrying hazardous chemicals, another unmanned 73-tanker runaway train full of crude oil also was passing through a small town of Lac-Megantic in Quebec, Canada, on an early Saturday morning, July 6. However, in the movie, the runaway train was eventually stopped by two railroad workers (played by Denzel Washington and Chris Pine). Sadly, this runaway train derailed and caused five tanker rail cars to explode in the downtown district of Lac-Megantic.

(click to enlarge)
Graphic Source: BBC

Loose Oil Market Remains Calm

What ensued was described as "a war zone with multiple blasts came over a span of several hours" in the town of 6,000, which is about 155 miles east of Montreal and about 10 miles west of the Maine border. The latest news reported 13 dead, 50 missing, and crews are still working to contain 27,000 gallons of light crude that spilled from the tankers and possibly into a nearby river. Typically, this kind of oil related disaster would have sent at least a spike or two to the oil price. However, attesting to the current loose and already over-supplied environment, traders and crude oil market hardly even blinked.

Bakken Oil Rail Shipping Economics

The train, which belongs to Montreal Maine & Atlantic (MMA), reportedly was shipping the crude oil from the Bakken Field (in Williston Basin) in North Dakota toward Maine. Some of you may be wondering how this trade could make any economic sense considering shipping by rail adds about $20 a barrel, on average, to the cost of oil. Here is how the math works:

The modern day shale revolution has helped elevated North Dakota as well as the U.S. to be the most prolific oil producing regions in the world, but also has caught the energy and oil transport industry by surprise.

(click to enlarge)
Chart Source: Minneapolis Fed

The lack of sufficient pipeline takeaway capacity was a major factor behind Bakken oil priced at a discount of $28 a barrel to NYMEX WTI in February 2012. Mind you that there's also an additional WTI-to-Brent discount of up to $25/bbl at some point during 2012, owing largely again to the pipeline constraint leading to the oil glut at Cushing, Okla., artificially depressing the price of NYMEX WTI.

The light and sweet Bakken crude is actually more suited for the refineries on the U.S. East Coast since plants there are mostly older and require higher grades of crude oil such as Bakken's as feedstock, whereas the refineries on the Gulf Coast are geared more toward handling cheaper and heavier crude grades. This unprecedented huge spread between the land-locked Bakken, WTI and Brent has made shipping crude oil by rail across Maine to a refinery in the Maritimes an attractive alternative. For example, by mid-2012, both Pan Am Railways and MMA were looking to move vast amounts of crude to an Irving Oil refinery in St. John, New Brunswick.

Pipeline's Loss Is Rail's Gain

So while most of the environmental attention has been focused on boycotting new pipelines like the Keystone XL, railroad companies such CSX Corp. (NYSE:CSX) and Canadian National Railway (NYSE:CNI), hurting from decreased coal volume and a weak economic recovery, have emerged as significant players in the oil transport business at the Williston/Bakken field.

The North Dakota Pipeline Authority now estimates that 71% of the crude oil moved out of the Williston Basin was transported on rail cars while only 20% of it was carried in pipelines. Rising production and legislative gridlock on new pipelines means rail would have an increasing market share of transporting oil out of Williston basin.

(click to enlarge)
Chart Source: EIA

Pipeline, Rail, or Truck?

Within the continental U.S., pipeline, rail, and truck are the three main transport modes for crude oil. Pipelines are the most cost-effective to transport crude oil in the United States, but they require heavy capital investment with many regulatory hurdles. Rail, on the other hand, is not as big an environmentalists' target as oil pipelines, and is cheaper than truck in transporting oil. Ultimately, a legislative veto of pipeline projects like Keystone XL actually has pushed the underlying oil transport need and investment money toward rail.

Energy Security and Infrastructure

While the surging shale oil production has made "energy independence" seem more feasible for the U.S, it also has exposed the lag in the country’s infrastructure to transport new domestic production in a safe and the most cost-efficient timely manner to the end users, which is the more important aspect of achieving the ultimate energy security.

According to EIA, Bakken pipeline capacity will increase to more than 650,000 bbl/d and rail capacity to nearly 900,000 bbl/d in 2013. The price spread between Bakken oil, WTI and Brent has narrowed since 2012, and the trend is expected to continue. As this oil rail trade gradually becomes uneconomical, the fact remains that the U.S. needs more pipeline infrastructure in order to keep the nation's energy costs in check.

(click to enlarge)
Chart Source: EIA

This rail disaster at Lac-Megantic most likely will not slow down the rail development, but it is also time for the U.S. government to put idealism, politics and lobbying money aside and let the pipeline do what they do. It is bad business if we have to import foreign oil because the country lacks more cost-competitive infrastructure to transport domestic oil production.

Source: Pipeline Vs. Rail: Canada Oil Train Crash