Warren Buffett: The Rust on the Icon 9 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Who doesn't love the image Warren Buffett projects in the media?
The beloved stock-picker, with his mantra "buy smart, sell never", has become an American icon. He preaches the free market, capitalism, smart business practices and running a tight ship. He lives frugally in a modest home, doesn't flash his (extreme) wealth and claims that through hard work and dedication one can succeed in America.
And now, Berkshire is set to report what may be the best quarter in his firm's history.
The truth is somewhat different.
Buffett has repeatedly used his influence to exempt himself from laws that apply to everyone else. Among them is an exemption from reporting requirements when he acquires or sells significant stakes in companies; these actions are required, for ordinary people, to be reported to the SEC and filed publicly. Warren has an exemption.
He was a "smart investor" in Goldman and others during the crisis, getting usurious interest rates and terms on capital he provided to help these companies out. But was he really just making a bet? The evidence says otherwise; Warren's statements both at the time and later one made clear that he had every expectation, and perhaps even inside information, that the government would not allow these firms to fail. That is, he didn't make a bet - he jumped in front of the taxpayer, a form of legal "front running", to garner a guaranteed profit.
Wells Fargo, a firm that Berkshire has a massive holding in, is a bank with dubious reserves and provisions in its mortgage book. One of many, of course. Yet Warren, Mr. Ethics, has refused to demand that Wells (along with other financial firms he holds) come clean on their loan book valuations, despite overwhelming evidence from seized banks thus far that essentially every bank is and has been overvaluing these so-called "assets".
Berkshire owns a big chunk of Moody's, a stake they recently trimmed. But Moody's is in fact at the heart of the credit storm - it was only through the granting of ratings that we now know were absolutely unsupportable that the credit bubble was able to be blown and maintained in the first place. Worse, Berkshire's other businesses, the core of which are insurance and banking-related firms, were and are absolutely reliant on that ratings business in order to raise capital in the markets.
Vertical integration often leads to a conflict of interest. While Berkshire is not the sole owner of any of these firms, their stake is large and influence considerable.
More stunning is the pernicious manner in which Buffett has talked out both sides of his mouth when it comes to government bailouts and handouts.
Berkshire has stakes in Goldman, Wells, American Express, US Bancorp, General Electric, M&T Bank, Bank of America, Sun Trust and more. All of these have received enormous amounts of bailout money - both directly and indirectly through FDIC-backed bond issuance. Indeed, about 3/4 of the credit issuance over the last few months of these firms has been at zero market risk as a consequence of government guarantees.
This isn't "free market capitalism" at all, and neither is "lending" money to an entity at usurious rates while expecting that the government will backstop your loan.
Yet that is exactly what Warren did - more than once.
Warren may be a shewed investor, but of late, it appears that the lesson Warren is really imparting is that once you amass a big amount of money the most effective way to profit is to figure out who will extort bailouts for their bad behavior from the government, then front-run that bailout in those firms.
That leaves me with more of an image of John Dillinger than "The Oracle of Omaha" for Warren's visage, and this is the guy who epitomized "investing for the long haul" over the space of more than 30 years.
That's a sad reflection of what this nation, which used to value hard work and a solid persona and business ethic, has become.
Related Articles
|
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication in the last week
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Those with the largestSee all
increase in followers
in the last week
Fastest Climbers » -
Top Commenters
Top commenters,See all
as ranked by their peers
Top Commenters » -
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most activeSee all
Instabloggers.
Top Instabloggers » -
Top StockTalkers
TopSee all
StockTalkers.
Top StockTalkers »
It was never that bad for BRK, and perhaps now with these huge markups its now as "good" as it will seem.
But ... get some clicks.... good headline... except its the 4th one in 2 days. Your point is simply mis-guided and your thesis is bent.
>More stunning is the pernicious manner in which Buffett has >talked out both sides of his mouth when it comes to government >bailouts and handouts.
pernicious
pernicious... means destructive....
Buffets longterm persistent confidence in the US and its economy was, and is, a HUGE factor in the "recovery".
When Buffet did these 'pernicious' actions... you could have followed and bought GS at $64.... BRK at 72k....
You didn't... because you didn't have faith. Buffet does!
Less work and risk for the government's $10 billion after Mr. Buffett's $5 billion.
Reminds me of the time Costa Rica declared war on Germany and Japan a week BEFORE Pearl Harrbor. Under the Monroe Doctrine, that country's getting into trouble would trigger the intervention--of the U.S. government.
He is in the insurance business for the most part, but his reports say very little about the insurance interests which amount to largely speculation on weather and the demand for reinsurance services from the retail insurance markets. These are not competitive markets for the most part. Lasting relations and size dictate access. The man buys monopolies if he can and he likes to keep them tight. His bank holdings are in effect monopolies as well geographically and in market segments (WFC loves consumer lending at nefarious rates and it favors CRE much to its regret). Still, all of manipulations do not reap him exception returns, until now. Why now? Will, if the cost of funds is zero and you loaned it to your PIPE clients at variable rates on bank loan returns, you can get ahead. The man lives in an inside world where his deals are gargantuan compared to other financial options, and his moves are equally wild. Will I sell? No, today the stock moved like a race horse, and he will do well. It is like being in the mob collecting vig.
He's not that bad. A better comparison would be Rothschild.
He's not that bad. A better comparison would be Rothschild.
i'm a great fan of warren buffet and i have setup a twitter account to broadcast his quotes from the media. please check out and follow
Adjective
Formal
1. wicked or malicious: pernicious lies
2. causing grave harm; deadly [Latin pernicies ruin]
I used to be a fan of Buffet, but not anymore. I too am sure he is front running from use of info from Gov't and if all the bankrupt companies that BRK invested in had been allowed to collapse then BRK would only be worth pennies and Buffet would be called a fool.
John Dillinger wasn't that bad, he loved the people and a lot of the people loved him, more of a Robin Hood type of character (robbing the rich to pay the poor) whereas Buffet (and Rothschild for that matter) were only interested in profitting themselves and to hell with anyone else not part of their cabal.