Bullish Divergence in Natural Gas 14 comments
Submit
an article to
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Recently the Natural Gas markets have been extremely volatile. Within the past 3 months we have witnessed more than a 25% swing ranging from the highs to the lows. During the past few weeks natural gas prices have been consolidating around the $3.75-$4.00 range. This consolidation phase prompted a bullish signal with the winter ahead of us. After reviewing some trends, I believe that natural gas prices are poised for a move higher in the short and long term time frames.
Fundamental Analysis:
After browsing various meteorological sources, I found a video of Accuweather's Chief Meteorologist and Expert Long Range Forecaster, Joe Bastardi, whom has released an early prediction for the 2009-2010 winter. He is predicting a very cold winter for the upper NE between Washington D.C. and New York City. This winter could possibly bring the coldest and most severe conditions the region has witnessed in the past 5 years.
This forecast seems to follow the general trend of predictions from most of the local meteorologist within the region. If the forecasts are proven to be correct, natural gas prices could increase by more than 25%.
Technical Analysis:
Fundamental Analysis:
After browsing various meteorological sources, I found a video of Accuweather's Chief Meteorologist and Expert Long Range Forecaster, Joe Bastardi, whom has released an early prediction for the 2009-2010 winter. He is predicting a very cold winter for the upper NE between Washington D.C. and New York City. This winter could possibly bring the coldest and most severe conditions the region has witnessed in the past 5 years.
This forecast seems to follow the general trend of predictions from most of the local meteorologist within the region. If the forecasts are proven to be correct, natural gas prices could increase by more than 25%.
Technical Analysis:
With the hottest part of the summer approaching and the winter months ahead of us, natural gas prices are poised to increase. After analyzing the 10 day chart of UNG, I have noticed that there was a sign of bullish divergence forming between UNG and the Relative Strength Index, RSI, technical indicator.
For those not familiar with technical indicators, the RSI compares the magnitude of recent gains to recent losses in an attempt to determine overbought and oversold conditions of an asset.
After analyzing the indicator in conjunction with the security, I noticed a discrepancy in the trends. As UNG makes multiple weekly lows, the value of the RSI makes higher weekly lows. This is an excellent example of bullish divergence. Bullish divergence occurs when the security prices falls to a new low, but the oscillator makes a higher low and fails to make a new low. When an oscillator displays the following pattern described above it means that there is more buying pressure than selling pressure at the given price.
If the short divergence above proves to be valid, UNG prices could appreciate as high as $14 within the next week.
The following chart is a 3-month chart of UNG:
The following chart is a 3-month chart of UNG:

As highlighted in the chart above, the prices currently reside on strong support levels. Not only are current prices at a key trendline support level and at the 200 day Moving Average support, we are currently positioned at the 23.6% Fibonacci Retracement level.
For traders not familiar with the Fibonacci retracement tool, the retracement tool is used in technical analysis to reflect the probability of a security to retrace to that of the original amount. The Fibonacci levels are created by drawing a trendline between the highest and lowest points of the security (in that time frame) and then dividing the vertical distance by the key Fibonacci ratios of 23.6%, 38.2%, 50%, 61.8% and 100%.
These key support levels mentioned act as technical barriers that need to be overtaken before UNG can expect a positive price movement. If UNG were to move upward, using the 200 Day MA as firm support, UNG could rally as high as or higher than $15.
Disclosure: At time written, author did not own any securities of UNG, but looking to accumulate option calls in the near future.
Related Articles
|


























Maybe those indicators are accurate but I wouldn't bet on the weather to back you up...
A) the political disturbances in Iran would drive up NG prices because of Iran's vast natural gas reserves (LOL) and
B) the price effect on natural gas due to the american dollar (LOL x 2)
Now, to add to your resume of information, you saw a video of a meteorologist on Accuweather.
Solid
I see UNG above $15 by winter though.
On Aug 10 12:07 PM Mad Hedge Fund Trader wrote:
> dfgg. I have been a growling, obnoxious, and highly unpopular bear
> on natural gas since I put out my sell recommendation on June 2 ,
> just before the crash from $4.30 to $3.10. Since then it has been
> bouncing around like a ball bearing in a boxcar on the Durango &
> Silverton Railway. Devon Energy’s (seekingalpha.com/symbo...)
> CEO Larry Nichols has me wondering how long this exasperating action
> will continue, and when a recovery will begin, if ever. NG has been
> a screaming chart buy for months, but with terrible fundamentals.
> Thanks to advanced fracting technologies, hardly a week goes by without
> a major new find somewhere in North America, taking our reserves
> from nine years to 100 years in a New York minute. So the US is sitting
> on a gigantic untapped gas formation? Who knew? DVN, one of the best
> managed companies in the industry, has a balanced oil/gas portfolio.
> Fortunately, windfall profits in oil have offset wrenching losses
> in gas. By chopping NG exploration to nothing, it has halved its
> drilling budget, and that money has dropped straight to the bottom
> line, enabling it to announce great earnings. See my call to buy
> competitor Chesapeake Energy (seekingalpha.com/symbo...)
> before its unbelievable 250% run . Despite the prices not seen in
> a decade, gas demand from industry remains moribund. But Nichols
> thinks continued production cuts will bring the gas market into balance
> sometime this winter, making those charts a lot more interesting.
> Maybe you should be picking up some of the NG ETF (seekingalpha.com/symbo...)
> on its next dive down to $12.50.
The Obama policy has not nodded to NG as yet, it will not do so until the coal fired are forced to dual fuel plants, and maybe autos burn NG. I think it is a while off, like years, but I have time and no body wants my stock--yet.
link.brightcove.com/se...
Total open interest on calls is 388737, open interest on puts is 537213 with majority of options around $13-14. Smells like naked short indeed!
The killer is that since the high volume of Mon 8/3 (62.9MM shares traded) the volume has declined to 23.34MM as prices dropped. This *does* indicate a change coming, in isolation, but when combined with the other indicators, it can't be interpreted to mean it's ready to turn up.
We recently had a reversal gap up, but it could not break away and the gap was filled within 4 days.
Significant resistance at $13.50, even with the premium being seen. We're going to see some more days below $12.50 for the near-term. Every time UNG pops over $13.50, e.g. the recent brief foray to the intra-day high of $14.19 on 8/5, it heads right back down.
As I write this, the Nymex HH futures for Sep-Dec show $3.541, $3.812, $$4.655, $5.404. A few months ago the spreads were similar, although the price points were different. As each month becomes current front-month, it has consistently suffered price deterioration. They will continue to behave this way, I think, until far into the winter (haven't worked all the number yet, so this is a SWAG - Scientific Wild-Assed Guess).
Roll forward starts 8/13 and continues through the 18th. About two thirds of the time (examined over a six month period) price falls for the four days during which this is done. The changed nature of the UNG structure may affect this. Since this is the first time we'll see this situation, we have no prototype to use for comparison.
Technicals aside, because of changes in the composition of the fund, due to lack so far of SEC approval for more units (and appears unlikely to ever be granted for now), tracking of the underlying is uncertain. Further, the CFTC actions are limiting the positions UNG can hold in the NG futures market.
Since new baskets can not be "created" and "redeemed" by dealers, the units are now trading more like a normal stock and tracking error is evident already (NAV +4.14% premium at close of 8/10). This will correct at some point ... maybe. This is the *only* thing I see as a near-term *possible* upward impetus.
Rig counts down 58% from 8/29 and 9/12 peak to 681, but injections to storage still coming in higher than expected for the time of year.
When I combine these charts I developed
static.seekingalpha.co...
with my expectations of the economy, 19%+ storage over-supply (compared to 5 year average), expected reduced consumption for industrial use (per GDP estimates recently, only 65% capacity utilization), reduced drayage and transportation use (reduced ecomonic activity), consumer being squeezed and lowering/raising thermostats to save money, it would have to be one hell of a winter and in an area broader than just the northeast to make a dent in this scenario.
Since normal ratio of underlying to NAV is 1:3.45, to make $15, the underlying NG futures and OTC swaps that UNG must now purchase will have to work out to $4.35 NAV. EIA predicts that prices for NG will remain below $4.00 for the remainder of 2009.
Although I don't show them here, I have also constructed charts that show historical production/consumption and rig trends. I have to assume that the normal increase in winter consumption will be muted unless the increased severe winter weather is widespread.
Remember that UNG does not trade in isolation. It is still strongly connected to the actions of the underlying NG futures contracts, even if a larger portion is now in OTC swaps.
To summarise: I disagree. I think your article doesn't address the considerations properly.
Disclosure: long UNG short calls as a *trade*, not an investment. I make more $$ if UNG goes up, so my comments are counter to my best interests. But I saw conditions to make some $$ with this combination regardless of which way it meanders.
HardToLove
On Aug 10 08:30 AM kmi wrote:
> Ouch... if you are betting on the weather... NE experienced one of
> its mildest summers ever, which some folks are blaming on El Nino,
> and suggesting El Nino will contribute to a milder than normal winter.
>
>
> Maybe those indicators are accurate but I wouldn't bet on the weather
> to back you up...
here's an interesting article on natural gas staying below $4 for years:
www.rigzone.com/news/a...